Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

carphonewarehouse/02 default help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5174 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys im new to the forum but you guys seem like you can help me.

 

me and my other half have went for a mortgage and the credit check came back as us both having 1 default on our reports etc, which neither of us had any idea about. so we bought an experian report and they are there, mine for £21 hers for £29

 

mine from carphonewarehouse and hers from t-mobile through carphonewarehouse

 

now i called up CPW and settled the account, i then asked to have the default removed as the £21 is effecting me getting a mortgage, they said its settled so that will be fine, but we all know thats not true a default is the same if its settled or not.

 

so i asked them to see if they could escelate it, the problem is, back in 2004-2006 carphonewarehouse used to take the payment for the contract and pass it onto the provider, well i upgraded my contract and moved to vodafone, to which CPW would have sorted out the rest, turns out they didnt, and because all letters from 02 etc go through them i had no idea of a default placed on my account, no-one told me of it, and if they had i would have paid the £21 for the sake of keeping my report clear for just this reason.

 

they said they are putting it to their legal team who do the equifax report side of things and they will get back to me in a few days.

 

if they turn round and say no what can i do, i have seen some templates on the net for this sort of thing (wel for credit card companies), i dont think it fair that either me or my other half are being stopped getting a mortgage because of £50 between us on defaults we knew nothing about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just had a lengthy talk with their conplaints department about my £21 one

 

they swear blind they talked to someone on the phone 6 times about this account and its overdueness but i have no record of this or any memory of any conversations with myself, they say that because of the length of time since it happend in july 06 they cant check their records as they are only kept for so long, so i said well if you no longer have the records how can you justify me still having the default applied to my account from yourselfs meaning i can get mortgages etc because of this default for only £21, had i known about it do you not think i would have paid the amount.

 

he simply says nothing they can do about it, and that a default thats satisfied is better than one that is not.. to my reply, tell that to the mortgage peoeple then as they dont seem to know as much about it as you do. and that he says the default will stay on for 7 years now where as i thought it was 6 lol even better its getting longer now..

 

any help as to what i can do if anything, its really stopping ym family from moving on, all because of a past phone contract for a bloody EX.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also while i remember i kept asking didnt you have to send me a letter about the default notice etc as nothing was received all he kept saying was we spoke to you on the phone as the notes say, but we cant check records as we dont keep them that far back..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, mobile "defaults" are not the same as financial ones. Basicly, when you sign up for a contract mobile, you also agree to them sharing some of your details with the CRA's. They record you paying on time or late or not at all the same as banks do, and as you have found out it does as much damage as a financial "default" but they are not covered by the same regulations as the banks :(

 

Keep at them, If you have the energy I'm sure they will cave in! Fight it from both sides, talk to the CRA's that have this negative info on you and ask them about removing it as CPW hadn't sent a bill to you for it.

 

Best wishes

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a troll around this part of the forum, I'm sure there will be some glimmers of inspiration Credit Reference Agencies - The Consumer Forums

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Credit Reference Agencies - The Consumer Forums You had a look around here? (for some reason it didn't link in my last post!)

 

Lots of people dealing with similar things.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen this here

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically after several phone calls talkingt o many people all trying to do their best to help, and even a letter pleading with them to remove the defaults they all said no.:-x

 

Hi jamiemcarthur,

 

Can I ask if you sent your letter to this address?

 

Complaint Review Service

PO Box 116

Leeds

LS11 5DS

 

If not, it's maybe worth a try. I know that you've mentioned that they'd refer your case to their legal team but did their reply confirm that this was the outcome of their review?

 

While the situation currently remains the same there are a still some options open to you.

 

You could add a Notice of Correction to your credit file with the Credit Reference Agencies which is basically your opportunity to explain how the default occurred and why you feel that entry is incorrect.

 

Additionally, you may wish to contact The Information Commissioner's Office to see if they're able to review matters for you.

 

All the best.

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

right well quick update the wife had her default removed by tmobile completely removed with a thank you letter etc.

 

i got a letter back saying that they are sorry to hear about my problems. they can not remove the default because they are legally obliged to report accurate payment information of all customers to the credit bureaus, by asking to remove any information we would be fraudently reporting your information

 

now the letter is badly written and is signed by someone then pp.'ed by someone else.

 

can i write a letter back going for a different angle, as its really anoying how tmobile would do it for my wife but carphone arseholes wont do it for me.

 

they never spoke to me about the account being unpaid, no letters or phone calls like they state, and becuse its so long ago now, they tell me they dont even have the telephone records to check who it was they spoke to...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jamiemcarthur,

 

Can I ask if you sent your letter to this address?

 

Complaint Review Service

PO Box 116

Leeds

LS11 5DS

 

If not, it's maybe worth a try. I know that you've mentioned that they'd refer your case to their legal team but did their reply confirm that this was the outcome of their review?

 

While the situation currently remains the same there are a still some options open to you.

 

You could add a Notice of Correction to your credit file with the Credit Reference Agencies which is basically your opportunity to explain how the default occurred and why you feel that entry is incorrect.

 

Additionally, you may wish to contact The Information Commissioner's Office to see if they're able to review matters for you.

 

All the best.

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

 

 

hi lee no i sent my letter to the carphone warehouse complaints department.

Link to post
Share on other sites

called ICO they couldnt help so on the phone to consumer direct to see if they can help at all. but looks like because it was in my name even thought it was her phone and her bank account etc im responsible for it.

The woman at consumer direct has told me to call or write to the three credit bobies and ask to be disasociated from that account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right that didnt work either, they were not interested, and just told me that if it was in my name im the one to get shafted even if i never knew about it. so the only thing i can think of doing is to put a note on my credit file against it saying that it was a debt run up by a previous partner that i was not aware of. or soemthing like that

Link to post
Share on other sites

I ahve just received this reply from Experian who could not help me:

 

Further to our recent correspondence, I have been contacted by Carphone Warehouse regarding the account that defaulted on 08/06/05. They have confirmed that the details we hold are accurate and have requested that we retain the information on our database. Unfortunately I am unable to amend this information without the authorisation of the company in question.

The following Notice of Dispute will remain on this entry for 28 days. It will then be removed, unless I receive further notification from you:

"THE CONSUMER HAS DISPUTED THE ACCURACY OF THIS ENTRY AND WE HAVE THEREFORE ASKED THE PROVIDER TO INVESTIGATE IT. GIVEN THAT THIS DATA IS DISPUTED, PLEASE TAKE CARE IF MAKING AN ASSESSMENT OF ANY KIND THAT MAY INCLUDE THIS DATA."

If you have any further queries or wish to discuss this further, may I suggest you contact the company concerned direct at the following address:

Carphone Warehouse

1 Portal Way

North Acton

London

W3 6RS

Alternatively, you can call them on 0870 087 0168 quoting R081009. You may wish to explain that the account in question is archived.

Please be assured that should they send us any further instructions regarding this matter, we will act upon them accordingly.

Kind regards

Ami Toone

Senior Client Queries Administrator

Client Queries

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi lee no i sent my letter to the carphone warehouse complaints department.

 

Hi Jamie,

 

In addition to contacting the credit reference agencies to add a Notice of Correction to your file it may also be worth asking them to contact the Carphone Warehouse on your behalf asking to review this again.

 

While I can see you've already send various letters to them doing things this way will ensure that the query is handled by the department responsible for liaising with the credit reference agencies.

 

All the best.

 

I ahve just received this reply from Experian who could not help me:

 

Further to our recent correspondence, I have been contacted by Carphone Warehouse regarding the account that defaulted on 08/06/05. They have confirmed that the details we hold are accurate and have requested that we retain the information on our database. Unfortunately I am unable to amend this information without the authorisation of the company in question.

The following Notice of Dispute will remain on this entry for 28 days. It will then be removed, unless I receive further notification from you:

"THE CONSUMER HAS DISPUTED THE ACCURACY OF THIS ENTRY AND WE HAVE THEREFORE ASKED THE PROVIDER TO INVESTIGATE IT. GIVEN THAT THIS DATA IS DISPUTED, PLEASE TAKE CARE IF MAKING AN ASSESSMENT OF ANY KIND THAT MAY INCLUDE THIS DATA."

If you have any further queries or wish to discuss this further, may I suggest you contact the company concerned direct at the following address:

Carphone Warehouse

1 Portal Way

North Acton

London

W3 6RS

Alternatively, you can call them on 0870 087 0168 quoting R081009. You may wish to explain that the account in question is archived.

Please be assured that should they send us any further instructions regarding this matter, we will act upon them accordingly.

Kind regards

Ami Toone

Senior Client Queries Administrator

Client Queries

 

Hi Lucie,

 

As you feel that the information held is incorrect I would recommend getting in touch with the Carphone Warehouse as suggested to ask if they're able to review your case again.

 

Should the outcome remain the same that again you have the options of seeking further advice from the Information Commissioner and/or asking the credit reference agencies to add a Notice of Correction to your file.

 

Thanks,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...