Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No copy of default notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I did a SAR to a credit card company. They sent back a load of info but no copy of any default notice. I wrote back and asked for copies of default notices and they replied that they sent back all the info required and were "unable to provide you with copies of default notices".

 

Now I take this to mean they cannot find them and this also means they cannot procede with any legal action.

Does anyone know if this is correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks don't keep copies of DNs - they use templates for them. You need to check the history of the account in the SAR. If there is no record of it in the account history, then you can argue that they didn't send one. You need to make sure they terminated the account by asking for the full balance or selling it on to a DCA before you can use this information to your advantage. Don't raise it as an issue with them until you are sure of your facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used this to prevent a claim before,

You need to state that you can find no trace of a default notice in your records and have no recollection of receiving one. Therefore you have to assume that no such document was issued.

 

Without a copy of the original you are unable to assess whether the default notice was valid and effective.

 

Of Course you need to keep this quiet until the account is terminated.

Then you argue that this is termination was unlawful and resulted in you being released from your obligations under the alleged contract.

Also if no enforceable CCA exists then the default notice is invald as how can you be defaulted on a contract that never existed.

 

I wouldn't try to use it to make a claim against a creditor, but it worked for me in stopping dead a claim from a very aggressive DCA. I don't want to name them though. Hello Guests!!!

 

May not be the exact legal position, but i've found most creditors are equally unaware of the exact law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account is being chased by a DCA at the moment. I'm hoping I can use the fact that I do not have a copy of the default notice to stop any action being taken.

 

Do the DCA own the account or are they acting for the original creditor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what does this mean?? I have been told by crap one that my account entered into default in december but i have had no actual defualt notice from them,im a bit blonde and do not understand what it means :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

roncarr - it is not a "copy" of the DN you might want to argue you don't have - it is the actual original DN as there never were any copies. This info is only of use to you if the original creditor terminated the agreement by Termination Notice Or asked for the full balance without a DN OR sold the debt on wothout a DN.

 

Discod - it is best if you have a problem to start a new post so your query doesn't get mixed up with someone else's and you get answers specific to you. It might help to scan CrapOne's letter so we can say exactly what it says. A default can simply be a breakdown in the relationship between creditor and debtor and might not merit a DN. I suggest you read the Information Commissioner's guide to filing defaults, which you can find on the ICO's website under the Data Protection section.

Link to post
Share on other sites

roncarr - it is not a "copy" of the DN you might want to argue you don't have - it is the actual original DN as there never were any copies. This info is only of use to you if the original creditor terminated the agreement by Termination Notice Or asked for the full balance without a DN OR sold the debt on wothout a DN.

 

Discod - it is best if you have a problem to start a new post so your query doesn't get mixed up with someone else's and you get answers specific to you. It might help to scan CrapOne's letter so we can say exactly what it says. A default can simply be a breakdown in the relationship between creditor and debtor and might not merit a DN. I suggest you read the Information Commissioner's guide to filing defaults, which you can find on the ICO's website under the Data Protection section.

 

I already did and nobody answered il hae to find to post

 

 

I write in response to your requset for a copy of your executed agreement and statement of account under section 78 (s7:cool:of the CCA act 1974.

You are correct in stating that we do not need to request a signaturelink3.gif for your request under S78nof the CCA.However for data protection purposes we request a signaturelink3.gif to confirm your identity.As your address matches the one we have on the system I will proceed with your S78 request..

I enclose a scanned copy of your original agreement with Capital One.Please note that this sets out your name and address at the time you entered into your agreement with Cap One.Prior to signaturelink3.gif you were provided with a full copy of the terms of your original agreement to keep and were sent a further copy of your original agreement with your credit card. (the application was done online and my partner does not recall signing anything)

I also enclose a S78 statement of account which is set out at the end of this letter.

 

We are currently in the process of retrieving a copy of your current terms and conditions and will send this to you shortly. The balance on your account remains due and owing and it is important that you continue to make at least the minimum amount set out in your monthly statements. Failure to maintain payments may result in collections activity and a defualt notice being recorded on your file with the CRAlink3.gif.

 

If you are using or considering using the services of a claim management company we refer you to the warnings issued by the Ministry of Justice with regard to misleading statements issued by some of these firms about their ability to get debts written off.

 

Statement of account

 

Your account is in default and the amount currently due and payable is £960.49,you must continue to make payments on your account.

Under section 78 we are not required to provide a copy of the default notice and statement of default. However we can confirm that a statement of default was issued on 8th Decemeber 09.

Should you have any queries relating to the enclosed documentation write to the following address blah blah blah

 

 

Yours sincerely Lauran Tomasik Executive Office

Link to post
Share on other sites

roncarr - it is not a "copy" of the DN you might want to argue you don't have - it is the actual original DN as there never were any copies. This info is only of use to you if the original creditor terminated the agreement by Termination Notice Or asked for the full balance without a DN OR sold the debt on wothout a DN.

 

Discod - it is best if you have a problem to start a new post so your query doesn't get mixed up with someone else's and you get answers specific to you. It might help to scan CrapOne's letter so we can say exactly what it says. A default can simply be a breakdown in the relationship between creditor and debtor and might not merit a DN. I suggest you read the Information Commissioner's guide to filing defaults, which you can find on the ICO's website under the Data Protection section.

 

Deny receiving such document and put the creditor to strict proof such a document existed, without a copy it would be very difficult for them to prove. Only works if you are defending a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no trace of a DN having been sent on the recorded history you should have with your SAr then you can dispute a DN was ever sent. It not only works if you are defending a claim but also if you are trying to get defaults removed from your credit records and you are arguing the defaults were entered after the agreement was terminated without prior issue of a DN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...