Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Last month was confirmed to be the hottest-ever May on record, in terms of global average temperatures, completing an entire calendar year of month-by-month records.  The average temperature last month was 1.52C above the pre-industrial average, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, known as C3S. The average global temperature for the 12-month period to the end of May was 1.63C (2.9F) above the pre-industrial average
    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability. Many thanks   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 17/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with high court enforcement officers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First of all i had an account with a kitchen company and had a outstanding amount of £920.21.

 

I couldn't pay this, so I had a judgment made against me - the cost of the judgement was £169.79 with interest of £32.16. So I was told it all got moved up to the high court and a warrant of execution had been ordered.

 

While at work, a high court bailiff came round and as I wasn't home, handed my partner a letter saying 'warning notice visit by high court enforcement officer' and that he had come to take control of my goods and to discuss payment. On the second page there is a list of fees - the ones i've mentioned, and a cost for execution £ 101.75, Charges of enforcement officer £929.20 then total amount of levy £2153.11 and to contact the officer on his mobile.

 

I phoned a few times to no avail so left voice mail etc. 2 days later a letter came through the post saying notice of seizure and the officer had 'impounded my goods' and if they have to come back to remove goods, a further (minimum) £720.00 + vat would be added to my bill.

 

A few days later another letter arrived saying 'warning notice removal of goods' the letter stated that an officer had levied execution on my goods and the amount I owe from the date of the letter was £2626.43 bit of a jump from £2153.11... and again if they have to come round the £720.00 + vat would be added.

 

The officer hasn't been in my home so I can only guess he's saying he's levied the cars outside but I haven't signed anything or seen any paperwork which tells me what they have levied and when.

 

I phoned the company and asked what had been levied the women would only reply with "what do i need to know that for"!

 

So, would any levy now be invalid? can they take the car? can I now sell/hide it? I've spoken to the company and the bill is now £3330 something, no idea why? My understanding is.. if they levy something, then you have to at least be informed as to what has been levyed or have had to sign a walking possession?

 

Can anyone help me with what i should do or know the answers to my questions?

Edited by smithy78
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

take a deep breath and edit your post, split it in to paragraph's that way it will be read much easier, people tend to skip over cramped postings.

 

Be patient, some one will be along to help/advise you but in the mean time edit it so more readable.

 

Best wishes..

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all i had an account with a kitchen company and had a outstanding amount of £920.21.

 

I couldn't pay this, so I had a judgment made against me - the cost of the judgement was £169.79 with interest of £32.16. So I was told it all got moved up to the high court and a warrant of execution had been ordered.

 

While at work, a high court bailiff came round and as I wasn't home, handed my partner a letter saying 'warning notice visit by high court enforcement officer' and that he had come to take control of my goods and to discuss payment. On the second page there is a list of fees - the ones i've mentioned, and a cost for execution £ 101.75, Charges of enforcement officer £929.20 then total amount of levy £2153.11 and to contact the officer on his mobile.

 

 

I phoned a few times to no avail so left voice mail etc. 2 days later a letter came through the post saying notice of seizure and the officer had 'impounded my goods' and if they have to come back to remove goods, a further (minimum) £720.00 + vat would be added to my bill.

 

A few days later another letter arrived saying 'warning notice removal of goods' the letter stated that an officer had levied execution on my goods and the amount I owe from the date of the letter was £2626.43 bit of a jump from £2153.11... and again if they have to come round the £720.00 + vat would be added.

 

The officer hasn't been in my home so I can only guess he's saying he's levied the cars outside but I haven't signed anything or seen any paperwork which tells me what they have levied and when.

 

I phoned the company and asked what had been levied the women would only reply with "what do i need to know that for"!

 

So, would any levy now be invalid? can they take the car? can I now sell/hide it? I've spoken to the company and the bill is now £3330 something, no idea why? My understanding is.. if they levy something, then you have to at least be informed as to what has been levyed or have had to sign a walking possession?

 

Can anyone help me with what i should do or know the answers to my questions?

 

Who is the enforcemet company?

I ask because they vary with the charges and if we know who you are dealing with more advice can be given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all i had an account with a kitchen company and had a outstanding amount of £920.21.

 

I couldn't pay this, so I had a judgment made against me - the cost of the judgement was £169.79 with interest of £32.16. So I was told it all got moved up to the high court and a warrant of execution had been ordered.

 

Was this Judgment by Default and if so did you get the original paperwork from the Court to allow you to Defend/Counterclaim/Payment Plan?

 

While at work, a high court bailiff came round and as I wasn't home, handed my partner a letter saying 'warning notice visit by high court enforcement officer' and that he had come to take control of my goods and to discuss payment. On the second page there is a list of fees - the ones i've mentioned, and a cost for execution £ 101.75, Charges of enforcement officer £929.20 then total amount of levy £2153.11 and to contact the officer on his mobile.

 

I phoned a few times to no avail so left voice mail etc. 2 days later a letter came through the post saying notice of seizure and the officer had 'impounded my goods' and if they have to come back to remove goods, a further (minimum) £720.00 + vat would be added to my bill.

 

A few days later another letter arrived saying 'warning notice removal of goods' the letter stated that an officer had levied execution on my goods and the amount I owe from the date of the letter was £2626.43 bit of a jump from £2153.11... and again if they have to come round the £720.00 + vat would be added.

 

The officer hasn't been in my home so I can only guess he's saying he's levied the cars outside but I haven't signed anything or seen any paperwork which tells me what they have levied and when.

 

If he has he should still have left you paperwork detailing this + most HCEO's would take the vehicle straightaway.

 

I phoned the company and asked what had been levied the women would only reply with "what do i need to know that for"!

 

So, would any levy now be invalid? can they take the car? can I now sell/hide it? I've spoken to the company and the bill is now £3330 something, no idea why? My understanding is.. if they levy something, then you have to at least be informed as to what has been levyed or have had to sign a walking possession?

 

I think at present someone is taking you for a ride.

 

Can anyone help me with what i should do or know the answers to my questions?

 

 

Sherforce usually load all the fees before the HCEO even leaves the Office. Most of these fees can be challenged as the majority will come under Miscellaneous. They use an all encompassing piece of paper to say they have seized all your goods - however they still have to go through the due process of levying on them, (otherwise how do they know what you have got). If you have any documentation from them hang on to it as you may need it at a later date.

 

The most important thing at present is the answer I posed about the original CCJ above.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes got the paper work from the county court when judgement was made, at the time things was looking good so didn't send the response form back as was going to pay it off, then got hit by a rogue customer who wouldn't pay and it through it all out the window! silly i know and ive learned quick from my mistakes, didn't know it had been moved up or been to the high court until the officer came round. the only paper work that was lefted when he came round was the warning notice and that he had come to take legal control of my goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume from what you say this is a business debt as opposed to personal. What form does you business take - Ltd hopefully? Do you trade from separate premises or from home?

 

It is very important to find what stage you gave up at before you got the CCJ. Is it possible you could explain the procedure before the CCJ was adjudged against you?

 

Unfortunately you never get any prior warning about the High Court until the HCEO turns up at the door.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im a property maintenance company (sole trader) don't have premises as such.

 

The HCEO has to gain peaceful entry to your home - same as a Bailiff. However if you have detached buildings eg garage or shed then he is entitled to force entry to these if he believes there are goods inside that may help satisfy the debt.

 

As it would appear that no levy has been made I would move any motor vehicles well away from your property - not just round the corner. Unlike a Bailiff he can and will add extra charges each time he calls so it is in your best interests to come up with some method of payment. You can offer a payment plan but he has to check with the Creditor whether it is acceptable.

 

You should ask for a breakdown of the fees you have been charged so far so we can have a look to see where any mistakes may have been made. Too late now of course but possibly don't post too much detail as certain company's do monitor what is being said here.

 

I'll be back in the morning to catch up.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wish you would of told me that earlier, next your be telling your the bailiff that come to my house.... Have made a £200 token payment and sending an offer of payment. will get that breakdown list of fees. Thanks very much for your help and advice PT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, PT is one of the good guys. But it is a reminder to those wishing to post with problems. Not all of those 'guests' viewing threads are going to be people with problems like ours. Some of them will be the cause of them. So don't use your real name as your username. [i do, but with my eyes wide open]. If you have, don't fill in the location field on your profile [or go and delete it now]. Don't divulge any personal information or information that will identify you or where you are. In other words, all that advice you give your kids to be safe online, follow it! :)

Good luck smithy78. HCEOs appear to be strange beasties indeed but you're getting good advice.

Take care.

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
type o
Link to post
Share on other sites

If SF agree an arrangement make sure you stick to it or they will revisit and you will incur the further charges detailed.

 

Unfortunately, it sounds like you've burried your head in the sand and this will often be the result.

Edited by High Court Enforcer
typo etc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

Smithy78, request a Subject Access Request from Sherforce, there is a template of how it should be worded on this site. This will get you more detailed information of the fees charging and on the sequence of events, as they will include an Activity Report. You will need this in addition to a detailed statement of fees. You will then be in a better position to go through the charges and challenge them. You are entitled to an Inventory of any goods levied upon and a copy of any Walking Possession Agreement, whatever the idiots on their helpdesk say.

 

You are by no means alone in being stung by outrageous charges from these crooks.

 

DW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smithy78, I had same problem as you last year although different company. I paid original creditor direct as bailiff will just take his charges out and then send balance to creditor. I paid off creditor challenged the fees made by the bailiff using advice received on here, strangely the charges dissapeared, never heard from them again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smithy78, I had same problem as you last year although different company. I paid original creditor direct as bailiff will just take his charges out and then send balance to creditor.

 

Just be aware that the HCEO can enforce for their fees even if the original debt is paid to the creditor. The creditor will have signed SF's T&C's requiring that any payment recieved will be passed to them also.

 

The writ of fi fa clearly states that SF are to collect the judgment debt AND their fees from the defendant.

Edited by High Court Enforcer
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smithy78, I had same problem as you last year although different company. I paid original creditor direct as bailiff will just take his charges out and then send balance to creditor. I paid off creditor challenged the fees made by the bailiff using advice received on here, strangely the charges dissapeared, never heard from them again.

 

I would strongly suggest this wasn't for an HCEO attending.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary
Just be aware that the HCEO can enforce for their fees even if the original debt is paid to the creditor. The creditor will have signed SF's T&C's requiring that any payment recieved will be passed to them also.

 

I have it from SF themselves that they do not have Terms and Conditions and I have direct proof from them that when the debtor pays the creditor direct, they have no clear process for dealing with it.

 

The writ of fi fa clearly states that SF are to collect the judgment debt AND their fees from the defendant.

 

The exact wording is "Fees and Charges to which you are entitled (where appropriate)". There is nothing in the Writ itself or the HCEO Regs stating that the debtor is ALWAYS responsible for paying fees. In fact, the HCEO Association and several other HCEO companies state that debtor fees have to be adjusted when payment is made direct. It's only SF who want to have their cake and eat it too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would strongly suggest this wasn't for an HCEO attending.

 

PT

 

Oh yes it was, High Court Enforcement Ltd. Attempted to pile on a load fees, tried to turn a debt of £1,800 into nearly £4k in a matter of 7 days.

 

I paid the original creditor off in full including judgment costs, which I accepted, sent a letter to High Court EnforcementLtd requesting they justify their fees, all went very quiet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebtWeary

Rubbish eh?

 

I asked to see what had been agreed between SF and the creditor in my case as regards fees and was told "there are no specific terms and conditions specific to this matter". Trying to get straight answers from them to particular questions is like getting blood out of a stone.

 

You are just towing the party line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...