Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft Called At My Door.


kimberley6
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

Just wondered if anyone could give me some advice on Moorcroft.

They have been appointed agents for Natwest,on a credit card I owe just over £2000 on.

They have written to me once to offer me a reduction on the amount.

They hold another account of mine as well,and have sent a couple of letters saying a representative may call at my house,so I sent a letter saying that under common law ,only the postman or people asking for directions where allowed on my property and they certainly were not and that they would be trespassing if they did.

B****r me yesterday they put a card through my door saying they had called and I owed the £2000+ to Natwest and I had till the 12th Mar to contact them or else legal proceedings may start.

It gave me a local number to call and I think I know the guy.(Shock,Horror).

Just a thought that could this be a breach of the Data Protection Act?

Any thoughts on this please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I would complain to them, Trading standards and the OFT as they ignored your reasonable request not to call AND for putting personal information on a card and not putting it in an envelope. Doesn't matter that he posted it through your letterbox. The fact is that it contained personal info which anyone could see.

 

Complain, complain and complain some more

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the person you think you may know see or check he has a valid licence to collect debts and is he fully employed by moorecroft or is he working as self employed as it is moor have already breach there trading licence by sending someone without permission and on specific instructions from yourself go for it ...get trading standards involved

and the oft

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had any dealings with them?

 

Not with Moorcroft but they are all near as much the same. They don't like it when you play them at their own game. They all use the phone as their primary tool of aggression and letters as their scare tactics.

 

I've had the Leeds Losers and Wescot who I've seen off but I'm not doing so well in getting rid of Crapbot but then, they haven't bothered me for the last 16 months either

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the person you think you may know see or check he has a valid licence to collect debts and is he fully employed by moorecroft or is he working as self employed as it is moor have already breach there trading licence by sending someone without permission and on specific instructions from yourself go for it ...get trading standards involved

and the oft

In my neck of the woods, Moorcroft do have a self-employed collector (actually a really nice old guy). Are you saying that he would need a license to collect on their behalf? What if he didn't?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he doesn't have a licence then he cannot approach you never mind collect. It doesn't matter how nice anyone is - they are collecting for companies that profit from human misery and don't care what laws they break to do it. Moorcroft huff and puff but are not the brightest vermin in the cesspit and I have twice got rid of them quite easily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moorcroft are numpties. No authority or hold over anyone, much as they so desperately try to state otherwise.

 

Best course of action is to complain - seems unanimous. I'd do the same, and if nothing else, it's another nail in their coffin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they are not back to there old tricks of putting cards through doors by post and saying they visited.

 

Anyway, they have no more right be stood at your door than an Icecream seller.

 

If they do show up tell very unpolitely to sling there hook, slam door.

 

THEY HAVE NO LEGAL RIGHT TO COLLECT DEBT AND IN THIS CASE NO BACKING FROM THE COURT.

 

Moorcroft is in trouble you heard it here first, my source still works for them so I can say no more, but lets hope for good news.:cool:

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have, in the past, checked the position regarding licencing of doorstep collectors. They are generally self-employed. The OFT says that if they only do work for one company, then they are agents of the company and covered by that company's licence; if they work for more than one company they need their own licence.

 

Moorcroft like to pretend that because their collectors are self-employed they aren't responsible for their actions; they are.

 

Whilst I have no sympathy for anyone who takes on the job, it's worth notng that Moorcroft exploits its collectors - commission only, the colector pays all his own expenses and takes all the risk. If they are unsuccessful, it costs Moorcroft nothing. This is why you should complain if they break the rules.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

Moor@crap are usually the easiest to see off -- surprised you haven't had a letter from their new pre-whatever department yet (pre-school, pre-pubescent, pre-teen etc etc).

 

They'll just pass this on to the next DCA in the foodchain (or back to the OC) very quickly -- these people have probably got enough poor souls who unfortunately have never heard of CAG paying them that they can't be bothered with anybody even challenging them in the slightest.

 

From Moor@crap who invariably NEVER have the correct paperwork you can hold up the rest indefintely with "Debt in dispute".

 

Once a debt gets passed to moor@crap you're nearly home and dry.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...