Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ from Dairy Crest - Help Needed Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5223 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We received the CCJ pack from Banbury County Court recently in regards to an unpaid bill of £105 from Dairy Crest for the delivery of milk.

 

The claim form had additional charges etc. from the court and solicitor and the fun they were asking me to pay has increased to £188.88, I accepted the claim for returned it back to the claimant saying that I accepted the claim however I wanted time to pay. This form was sent back within 7 days of original receipt.

 

Yesterday, I received a letter from Banbury County Court telling me that as I had not responded, I was to pay the full amount within 14 days and the claim has been awarded to the claimant. This letter was dates the 16/02/2010.

 

Today, we have received the warrant of execution which is dated the 17/02 and says that unless I now pay £313.00 by the 23rd Feb then a Baliff will call and remove good for public sale...

 

I contacted Banbury court who said that I needed to speak to Dairy Crests solicitors in order to find out where the claim for I submitted was. I have done this as the lady at Brethertons said that I should have returned the form back to then, I advised her that there was a notice in the original claim pack telling me to return the completed admission for back to the claimant address which was Diary Crests HQ. She said this was wrong however she would speak to Dairy Crest to see if they have recieved it.

 

Phew !!

 

what can I do? the original debt was £102 and its now increased to £313 and there is a threat of baliffs unless I pay the full amount by the 23/02 which there is no ways that I can do.

 

I work during the day and I am worried that if Baliffs do turn up that my wife and kids will be in and they will somehow "gain" entry into the house whilst I am not here.

 

Can someone give me some advise please?

 

Thanks

:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

I think you should have paid the Court - but in any case did you send by registered letter / recorded delivery your acknowlegement.

 

If you did and haven't received a reply I think you've got a decent "In dispute" thing going here.

 

DO NOT LET THESE BAILIFF'S IN UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

 

You've offered 188 GBP (IMO the CCJ was for less --you only really have to pay the CCJ amount plus court costs --solicitors fees ARE NOT ALLOWED - I challenged Yorkshire Water on a 50 GBP Solicitors fee which they waived immediately).

 

I'd also write to the court explaining what's happened -- I don't know what to do next -- but you need to pay the amount you've offered to somebody --KEEP RECORDED DELIVERY / RECEIPTS.

 

DO NOT SPEAK OR HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE BAILIFF

 

In any case I don't think sufficient time has elapsed from a CCJ to getting it enforced in any case --you've got 28 days after judgement to pay it if you want the record removed.

 

 

Actually using the County Court mechanism for what might be really small amounts of debt - in comparison to things like Credit card deliquent accounts of several thousand pounds just shows how desperate firms have become.

 

Most Dairies would have allowed you to pay off the arreas over time -- well without wanting to seem facetious --get your milk from the Supermarket next time.

 

Again DO NOT LET THE BAILIFF IN. EVER.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

This apparently was a CCJ and it seems that 28 days hasn't passed from the CCJ hearing in which case enforcement is certainly NOT allowed.

 

Before any type of Court Bailiff action takes place ANOTHER COURT ENFORCEMENT hearing action has to take place.

 

Something about this whole episode doesn't seem quite correct -- in any case it would seem a bit overkill whichever way you look at it to use Bailiff's for a bill of just over 100 GBP.

 

The Court even gave you 14 days -- add that to 16 Feb brings you into March and if you haven't paid then they still have to go through the enforcement procedure.

 

Sounds either like a Bailiff "Phishing" trip or someone's Sols are pulling their luck.

 

If the COURT gave you 14 days on the 16th how can ANYONE get a warrant of execution on the 17th -- BEFORE the judgement period has expired -- this makes a TOTAL MOCKERY out of the whole system --something DEFINITELY is NOT CORRECT HERE.

 

Check please -

 

1) Date of CCJ

2) Dates of any further hearing for non payment

3) Enforcement notice papers

4) recept from creditor acknowleging your offer of payment.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, there are the dates etc from the paperwork

 

1) claim for issued in Banbury court on 27/01/2010 for £108.53 + £30 Court Fee + £50 solicitors - total of £188.53

 

2) paperwork sent back to the claimant on 07/02/2010 via first class postage saying that I accept the amount and wanted to make an offer to pay £20 PM

 

3) Judgment for claimant (in default) recieved dated the 15/02/2010 saying that I had to pay the claimant the sun of £108.94 + £102 in costs (£210.94)

 

4) Notice of issue of warrant of execution issued on the 16/02/2010 saying that I have not paid the judgement as ordered and that the claimant has asked for a warrant to be issued to the baliff to seize and sell my goods, unless I pay the amount due to the county court before 23/02 the baliff will call and may remove my goods. This will mean I have to pay further costs.

 

Total to pay including fees on the warrant (£313.19)

 

what are your thoughts?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

quick update, I have just spoken to Brethertons who are the claimants solicitors, they said that I should have sent the claim form back to them directly not to directly to the claimant as the instructions suggest..

 

The person also said that she would contact Dairy Crest as they need to get sign of the acceptance form in order to consider a payment offer and that I should contact the baliffs myself and tell me that the judgement is indispute and to no come to my house.................hmmmm.

 

the person said that is she needed to baliffs to confirm this then they would be ok to contact her directly.

 

is this making sense?

 

I also mentioned that there was supposed to be a judgement period of 14 however she said that this did not apply as the claim form award used the word forthwith (probably spelt wrong)

 

any advise would be great.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll find someone has been slightly economical with the truth. When you returned your Response back it should have been sent to the Court. As far as the Court were then concerned you had filed no defence etc and were found "guilty" by Default - the Claimant being awarded what they asked for.

 

The Claimant has known very well what you have done but have kept quiet - after all it is in their benefit for you to be adjudged against. For this very reason I wouldn't have anything else to do with them but would go back to the Court for further help and advice.

 

You could apply for Set Aside on the grounds you returned the Forms to the Claimant and not the Court. All this does however is to return you to where you are now. I think if I were you you I would file Form N245 instead which is an application for Suspension of a Warrant/Variation of an Order, this will allow you to try to put an instalment plan in operation but please note you have to submit Income/Expenditure and make an offer but remember the Court could overrule this and stipulate what you have to pay. You can also apply to suspend the Warrant as well.

 

The form is available on the HMCS website, I can't remember the fee but you may apply for fee remission on Form EX160 also available on the Court website.

 

My reasons for suggesting this route is that your Claimant failed to inform you that you had supplied the Court documents to them and also what other charges are they now likely to saddle you with. The Court will make a fair decision. Please remember a CCJ stays on your file for 6 years and affects Lenders if you apply for Credit.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little extra info on your CCJ and what it may mean.

 

Once awarded against you the CCJ will remain in place for 6 years when it automatically falls off - unless of course you haven't paid it off. Lenders look at your Credit History when deciding if they will lend you any cash or HP goods etc - chances are you will be refused. If you can pay within 28 days/1 month then you may apply to have it removed altogether so it doesn't exist. After this time and you have cleared it you can get a Certificate of Satisfaction which will then be noted on your Credit file ie the CCJ still shows but as paid in full.

 

As the debt does not appear to be a large one it may be in your best interests to be able to pay it off within the first month & thus have the CCJ wiped from your record.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a little update that I wanted to share with everyone.

 

I received a letter this morning saying that the claimant has accepted the payment plan I put together on the admission form which I return to them and that the baliff has been asked to suspend the warrant.

 

I am still being told that I need to pay £313.19.... is this right as this apparently included baliff charges of over £100 even though no baliff will be needed?

 

I get the feeling that the claimants solicitors are trying to pull a fast one here as they are asking me to send payments directly to them as apposed to the claimant.

 

is this right or very wrong?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

WHAT A STINKING mess -- charges of MORE than the original debt -- and I thought "Loan Sharking" was illegal.

 

You've offered to pay the CCJ -- IMO pay what the CCJ has requested and tell the otherrs TO GET LOST. There certainly hasn't been enough time after CCJ to get a warrant of execution -- and for such a small amount of money too.

 

What a Country we are becoming --saddling people who can usually LEAST afford to pay them with HUGE charges for relatively TINY amounts of debt and using the whole weight of the County Court system to enforce it while Bankers who miked the country DRY are enjoying almost OBSCENE amounts of money AT THE TAXPAYERS EXPENSE too.

 

I've been thinking for some time that It's definitely time I was "Out of here".

 

As soon as the Housing Market picks up a bit I'm selling and emigrating -- even Russsia is probably a better bet at the moment.

 

Cheers

jimbo

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply, in regards to the time between having the receiving the judgement in default and then the warrant of execution, it would have been inpossible to pay the amount on time even if I had the money in the first place..24 hours..

 

this is what I don't understand, when I asked the claimant solicitors about this they said that the a warrant of execution can be actioned at any time and does not have to wait a set amount of time, apparently the use of the word "forthwith" covers this.... (my middle English is a little rusty)

 

I am penning a letter back to Brethertons asking for a breakdown of all the charges however is there anything that I need to say or not say?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a little update that I wanted to share with everyone.

 

I received a letter this morning saying that the claimant has accepted the payment plan I put together on the admission form which I return to them and that the baliff has been asked to suspend the warrant.

 

I am still being told that I need to pay £313.19.... is this right as this apparently included baliff charges of over £100 even though no baliff will be needed?

 

I get the feeling that the claimants solicitors are trying to pull a fast one here as they are asking me to send payments directly to them as apposed to the claimant.

 

is this right or very wrong?

 

Thanks

 

Read post No 9, the solicitors are ripping you off.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read post No 9, the solicitors are ripping you off.

 

PT

 

how do I stop them ripping me off? what would I need to do or say either verbal or written?

 

sorry to ask so many questions, can I request a full breakdown of charges etc and then hope that they will realise that I am checking the legitimacy of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Asking for a breakdown of charges will do you no good as they have already listed them on the CCJ you got, the Bailiff charges are on top of this which is why we get to over £300+.

 

Because of what happened with your original Court docs you really should go back to the Court and explain. The chance are you will then only have the original CCJ costs to pay and a payment plan set by the Court. In my view it is Form N245 you need.

 

I believe the Claimants solicitor now knows they cocked this up and are trying to cover their own back. They knew full well you had returned the docs to the wrong place but never said a thing.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...