Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
    • I'm really trying, but worst case I can't find what are my options?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Homeless and in debt


Final Exit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If I am officially homeless (sleeping at friends' houses) should I continue to pay my token £1 monthly payments through direct debits, or stop them, and wait 6 years for my dca's to try and fail to find me, and the debts to then be cancelled?

 

My debts are over £50,000 so there's not much chance of my ever paying them off and I have no assets anyway. I wrote and told all dca's that I was made homeless last July but the silly b*ggers just started addressing letters to my penultimate address

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that you shouldn't be making any payments as your money should be put to priority debts - and I am sure that you will want to rent your own place sometime soon (forgive me if I am making assumptions here).

 

Other, more qualified and knowledgeable Caggers will be along to advise you... this is just my opinion.

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am considering bankrupcy but my situation has turned me into such an anxious and social retard, I can't even concentrate on a crossword at present, let alone contemplate going to court for bankrupcy. Is the stop paying and wait 6 years for the debt to be cancelled option a good one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i were you the last thing i would worry about is paying £1:00 token payments on the amount of debt you have outlined.

 

Even if you wanted to go bankrupt, can you afford too ?, correct me if i`m wrong [ not 100% sure] but i think you still have to pay to declare yourself bankrupt but if your claiming benefits i think its at a slightly reduced rate. Let one of your debtors make you bankrupt.

 

Concentrate on yourself for now in turning your life around & deal with the DCA`s as & when you get yourself sorted & are in a better position to deal with them, if you have no money or assets what can they get from you............... nada.

 

Your situation is more important right now, good luck for the future

 

Middxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were you with no assets and on benefits I'd stop paying for sure. You cannot get locked up for not paying debts except things like tax and council tax. What will you gain by paying? Nothing except prolonging the SB and agony. Creditors are unlikely to make you bankrupt if you have no assets though they may go for CCJ. I know several will disagree but I believe telling them where you are is a good thing. It will speed up any action they may take, just don't give them a phone number. The sooner it's done and dusted the sooner you get your life back. I've been there for half your amount and none even bothered with CCJ let alone BK. All SB now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely, you are the most important element in all of this now. I agree that perhaps in your particular situation bankruptcy could be a good option but it's cheaper if one of your creditors petitions for it themselves. If it were me I'd stop the payments to all but the priority (council tax as an example if you're making a contribution perhaps) but keep the cash for yourself and try to re-build.

 

They can't have what you haven't got and worst case scenario all of the defaults etc will drop off your credit file in 6 years. Also, if you stop making payments now the 6 year clock starts to tick before limitation finally kicks in, another good alternative for you. If you don't make a payment for 6 years the debt is finished, all the time you're paying towards something you'll never clear you're just prelonging the impossible.

 

Given that Barclays as an example are about to dish out millions once more in bonuses I don't think cutting you a break to allow you to get back on your feet is that big a deal to the financial organisations, they are doing just fine and those that weren't were given huge chunks of our money to prop them up. As such you are far more important and I'm sure I speak for many when I write that.

 

All the best and remember, many very successful people have walked your path, it merely made them more determined and just a little wiser ;).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing I would disagree with here is giving them your current address. It's your friend's address, and having that debt associated with his/her address could cause them problems later on. Debts are passed on to different DCAs as we all know, and I'm sure you wouldn't want your friend to face debt collectors turning up on the doorstep for the next six years.

 

Good luck for your future. I'm sure things will get better for you.

 

Have you spoken to the council about housing? If you are genuinely homeless they have a duty to find you somewhere to live.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop paying immediately, have no further contact with them.

 

If you want to work in the next 6yrs, or have any future inheritance like property, i would go bankrupt.

 

In your situation you have them by the balls and theres not much they could achieve by taking you to court.

 

Sure they can attempt to visit your whereabouts but they are not baliffs.

 

If your friend owns the property then you would not affect their credit and if its rented who cares.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I totally disagree with your last statement.

 

We all know that debts get passed round a large number of DCAs for up to six years, and sometimes even more.

 

Final Exit, I wish you all the luck in the world for your future, but I'm sure you wouldn't want debt collectors turning up on your friend's doorstep in the future, regardless of whether the house is owned or rented.

 

I would be absolutely livid if I had helped a friend and then had debt collectors turning up on the doorstep looking for them. We know that doorsteppers can be threatening and not take no for an answer from perfectly innocent people who have absolutely nothing to do with an alleged debt. Their address just happens to be listed as the last address for the person they are looking for.

 

Please don't do it. Kind friends don't deserve it. Just tell the DCAs that you are homeless and staying two or three nights here and there, and you cannot possibly give them an address at the present time simply because you don't have one.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree, DCA's will latch onto anyone and anything and once they have an address, yours or not, they'll do all they can to annoy whoever lives there. If that's someone who has helped you out they'll get stuck with the hassle. No Fixed Abode will do for the DCA's just fine. If you get stuck you could do what my brother did once when he was being hassled for a loan that he genuinely hadn't had. Seemed to be for a previous owner, his best guess.

 

The DCA was just fishing and started asking him for all kinds of proof that he wasn't who they were after...usual stuff. As he actually lives most of the time on his canal boat away from his 'land' address he gave them the following for all future correspondence to be sent to where he promised he'd look into it for them ;).

 

The Boat, The Canal, London.

 

Needless to say the postman hasn't found him yet :D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add my bit, I totally agree with most of what has already been said. Not sure that this would provide an answer, but, have you paid a visit to CAB? They should be able to provide help and advice with both your housing and debt needs.

 

I agree it is not right to give an address of any kind as once these pond lifes' get an address they will keep on and on regardless of who owns or lives at that property.

 

However, having suggested the CAB they might want to 'take over' handling your debts and this is not always 'helpful', so I would just state that you need somewhere to live and somewhere to receive mail.

 

Hope this works out for you - keep in touch on here as there are many of us who can say we are only one pay check away from your situation, and there will be loads of help and advice at every step of the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a close friend in the same situation. I would have agreed with the posters who said not to give your friends address, but I have just been told this in a more recent thread:

 

"if you entered into a contract or agreement with someone and you then move or become of no fixed abode, the responsibility for providing a contact address is yours and an e mail address is not acceptable.

 

indeed you are probably in breach of most agreements by not doing so"

 

So if this is correct, it seems a homeless person is required to provide a contact address......I wonder what the procedure be if they don't have one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the time you have no money, and are of no fixed abode, the last thing you need to be worrying about is being in breach of the agreement. :)

 

If they insist on an address, I would suggest that your friend writes and says they can address it to "The Park Bench on the North Side of such-and-such park". Failing which they can suggest the creditor might like to pay for a mailbox where they can send correspondence. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would write to them as fiollows:-

 

dear Sirs,

 

I am homeless, penniless, no possessions and have combined debts of 50,000. In short i am a man/woman of straw

 

I would invite you to write off your debt against me to give me a new start in life, failing which, should you feel the urge, please feel free to commence bankruptcy proceedings against me as i do not even have the funds to do that

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a close friend in the same situation. I would have agreed with the posters who said not to give your friends address, but I have just been told this in a more recent thread:

 

"if you entered into a contract or agreement with someone and you then move or become of no fixed abode, the responsibility for providing a contact address is yours and an e mail address is not acceptable.

 

indeed you are probably in breach of most agreements by not doing so"

 

So if this is correct, it seems a homeless person is required to provide a contact address......I wonder what the procedure be if they don't have one!

 

If you are going to quote my posts i would appreciate it if you would do so in the spirit they were intended

 

unless i am very much mistaken the poster i replied to (you?) was not giving me the impression that they were genuinely homeless

 

more they (you) were trying to come up with a smart arse way to avoid your obligations

 

a very different situation to the one outlined in this thread

 

you may find it difficult to get advice on your own situation if you mis represent advice that people on this forum are giving to you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...