Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
    • I am reading the thread now and think although its probably very similar to my predicament,  I have no way of obtaining the terms anymore due to MyParcelDelivery having being dissolved and their website not being active now. I have nothing to quote from and they didn't send me a copy at the time of order, the website that I believe they reinvented themselves as P4D has terms I am looking at now but however similar they may be I wont be able to quote from them in this case. Thanks 
    • Thankyou for your reply jk2054 thats put my mind at ease regarding going forward, appreciate your help.   Thanks Bankfodder, I will look over that thread now. In regards to the further info: Item was a jacket, value £995.00 and was declared correctly Item was fully insured to the value and £995.00 declared correctly  Item was sent on 03/02/23 Thanks  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statute Barred letter & credit file inaccuracies


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5228 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

I have written the below statute barred letter for Tesco Finance. I had a loan with them in 2001 and there's been no payment or letters from them since 2003 - until recently.

 

However, my credit files show the debt as being payments missed - see attached:

 

Based on the credit files being inaccurate (i.e. Tesco never actually defaulting the account), could you read my statute barred letter (below) and let me know if it's ok? I added a bit at the bottom that's 'out of the ordinary'

 

Thanks

Twinks

 

The Letter

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against myself to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that the false information I have noted against my credit files have been removed. Should this not happen then I will be taking the matter further with the Credit reference Agencies about them processing incorrect data and complaining directly the Information Commissioner`s Office re: the incorrect processing of data.

After this, I expect no further contact to be made concerning the above account.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

TESCO PERSONAL FINANCE - CREDIT FILE RECORD.doc

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

You also need to file a complaint with the CRA's and tell them this information is incorrect, that they have allowed an organisation to search and add date to your Credit file without your knowledge or express permission, and that they must remove it immediately failure to do so, WILL result in legal action and a calim for damages made against them and the company putting incorrect info on your CRF.

 

However if you threaten them with legal action, you MUST carry this out, as if you don't it will only hinder others who do intend to carry out seeking damages.

 

And as a little sweetener, damages for incorrect info on your CRF currently stand at £1000 per incorrect entry.

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone. So you all agree that it is an incorrect entry in the credit file - those 6 payments late continually for years, instead of a default and no word from the creditor.

 

The last correspondence was sent by me back in December 2003, offering payment but they never responded until now, when I get these statements through from tesco and my experian credit file has lots of pretty red 6's in it...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Boo - do you have any wording I can use in a letter - i'm happy to send it but I always feel a bit unsure if i'm writing the right stuff!

 

Funnily enough, about crf's - I have an entry on my account at present, that was due to drop off last February. Then all of a sudden, last January - the default date changed to a year later and subsequently, the file was left open for another year (due to drop off now end of the month).

 

I complained to Experian and they stated:

 

"Further to our recent correspondence, we have been contacted by Citi and Egg (C6) who have advised us that they are unable to amend/delete the entry in question at the current time.

 

Citi and Egg has requested that you contact them directly on 08451 233 233 regarding this matter. You may wish to include with your correspondence any documentation to support your comments.

 

The following 'Notice of Dispute' will remain on your report for 28 days. It will then be removed, unless we receive further notification from you:

 

"THE CONSUMER HAS DISPUTED THE ACCURACY OF THIS ENTRY AND WE HAVE THEREFORE ASKED THE PROVIDER TO INVESTIGATE IT. GIVEN THAT THIS DATA IS DISPUTED, PLEASE TAKE CARE IF MAKING AN ASSESSMENT OF ANY KIND THAT MAY INCLUDE THIS DATA."

 

Experian is unable to amend this information without the authorisation of the company in question."

 

I had printed out copies of my report where the dates had quite obviously changed.

 

Should I do something more about this also? If so, what should I do?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have similar problems with incorrect default dates and double listings for the same debt on some of my credit files. It seems that writing to the CRA's is useless as all they do is take the word of the DCA/OC.

I have written to the OC in my case but will not be engaging in any contact with any DCA until as such time I know the debt has been assigned to them correctly by which time it will be statue barred. I also will be keeping all records from the CRA's so they can not do the default date swap on me.

From this year if they do I will ask the CRA's to remove the data in 28 days if they don't I will send them a letter before action giving them another 7 days. Then its off to court we go!

Edited by 247orbital
Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much, all you can do is to warn the CRA's that you WILL be seeking damages against them for providing incorrect data on your CRF unless they remove it immediately.

 

But you MUST follow through on your threats of seeking damages against them, or you shouldn't use the threat.

 

Inform the ICO of the CRA's actions and that they are allowing organisations to put incorrect adverse data on your credit file, there is not standard letter template yo use, just put it in your own words, the problem, what you want them to do to rectify it, and what you will do if they don't.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...