Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Looming Peugot Warranty Dispute


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Am looking for a bit of advice on how to deal with a potential problem I can see looming over the next few days where I suspect Peugeot are going to try and shaft my better half for want of a better phrase.

 

She bought a new Peugeot 207, Manual Gear, (1.4L Petrol I think) in Sept 2007. The car is still under the 3 year manufacturer's warranty that she got with the brand new car upon purchase.

 

The car is used for her daily commute to work c7 miles away and in the 2 1/2 years owned has done just over 12,000 miles in total. She does not normally do any motorway travel at all and having been in the car with her on quite a few occasions now I am able to say comfortably that she doesn't ride the clutch.

 

Odd problem occured 2 weeks ago when she changed into 5th gear from 4th at about 3000 rpm on motorway to come visit me (normally I go to hers) where the engine a second or so after changing gear suddenly shot up to 4000 revs or so then fell back after a few seconds and car subsequently drove normally.

 

Since then the problem has begun to repeat and is quite replicable in terms of get to c2,500-3,000 rpm and change up to 4th and 5th and Voom large over revving and then subsides to normal expected range. There is also a noticeable drop in power now in 5th gear so acceleration is sluggish.

 

Car was taken to Peugeot garage last week where they advised from testing the microchip in the engine they couldnt see a problem and that they'd driven it up and down and to quote "it drove like a dream" despite being told exactly how to replicate the problem.

 

Anyways, girlfriend being admittedly not very knowledgable about the mechanical things in life, accepted the car back on the basis that "if it happens again bring it straight back and we'll give you a courtesy car whilst we fix it."

 

Lo and behold, it happens again and the Car is taken straight back in today to the Peugeot Garage (their first free slot).

 

They are now saying that they believe it to be the gearbox that is at fault, that they will take it out of the car to check but that it is likely to be wear and tear and if so not only is this not covered under the manufacturers warranty that she will have to pay £300 for the cost of them taking the gearbox out but then also any costs involved in replacing which they have said will be about £6-700 + labour.

 

To top it all off they have said there'll be no courtesy car as they think it's wear and tear (bearing in mind they've not even looked yet!!!) and not a defect or manufacturing fault and they may need the car to be kept for a few days to look at the problem. I have told her to bloomin well argue the toss over the courtesy car tomorrow as it's pathetic to offer it one week then suddenly change your mind when you see dollar signs in front of your eyes.

 

Now this seems to me to be a case of "Oh she's a blonde woman" let's just tell her it's wear and tear and we don't have to fork out on a warranty and we can earn a nice wad of folding stuff out of her.

 

Surely a clutch that has done 12,000 miles in 2.5 years from new and that hasn't been abused by some mad clutch riding maniac on steroids should be expected to not wear down to the point it needs replacing???

 

What are the options she has if the garage do try and wriggle out of the manufacturers warranty as they have indicated will be likely and label this as reasonable wear and tear?

 

Any advice would be most appreciated as I feel pretty gutted for her, she's just spent the last 3 hours in tears at the quoted costs of repairing what is essentially a fairly new car still.

Edited by Viqer Fell
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not know if this will help you, but my brother had a pug 307 on a 2007 plate ... was a motability car so was new, within the year it had a gearbox and two clutches replaced due to failure of pug parts ! he had to argue with the warranty people for ages but got it sorted in the end.

 

They changed the clutch the first time around, saying that was the issue... he had the car back for about a week and the gearbox destroyed itself.... blew a hole in the bell housing ! so needed a new gearbox and clutch again !

 

This is where the fun started... pug warranty said that it was down to neglect ! and said that if he paid for assessment and was found to be failure they would pay out... which to their surprise he did do, and surprise surprise was found to be a failure on parts !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest you firstly check some of the PUG sites. It runs in my mind that there was a clutch fault on some of the 2/3 series and some folks reckoned to get free repairs up to 5 yr. old.

Many manufacturers are trying to wriggle out of warranty work just now. I am having a hell of a job with Citroën---sister company of PUG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does sound suspiciously like a dual mass flywheel failure but not sure what engines they are fitted to. Costs quoted are comparable.

 

How the garage thinks they are going to find the answer by "plugging it into the diagnostic machine" defeats me given the fault description.

 

You should also log a complaint ASAP with Pegeout in Coventry asap to start the ball rolling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only hope they look inside and find it's not wear and tear and fix it under warranty but I am skeptical given their behaviour thus far.

 

In terms of suggesting a complaint I take it you are of a mind they will insist its wear and tear but that her only option would be to pay them whatever bill they demand and then try to claim it back through complaining to Peugeot?

 

Have told her to go back in morning, demand a courtesy car (bearing in mind they haven't even looked at the clutch yet, they're just assuming its wear and tear) and then to get them to do their investigation work as soon as they can slot it in.

 

It does sound though from your inference is that if they want to be assholes she'll get stuck with paying a massive bill and then having to argue the toss with some git at Peugeot who is targetted to reduce paying out on claims where possible. Brilliant :-/

 

Thanks for the replies and will update when I hear tomorrow what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heliosuk, I think you have propably cracked it. It was the DMF that people were having trouble with, and in fact it is possible to repair by fitting a normal flywheel.

Can't say which PUGS have DMF but it's only the Citroen diesels which use them. OP thinks it's a petrol that burd has--seems unsure.!!

Have read several posts recently about faulty gearboxes---nearly all say that gearbox has to be replaced????????????? Surely if casing is OK then it must be cheaper to replace bearings etc etc--- or is this another case where "technicians" can't do the job---bet a motor mechanic could!!!!!!!!!!

See my post on "Girning gear lever" on Citroen site.

Edited by scaniaman
dippit
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only hope they look inside and find it's not wear and tear and fix it under warranty but I am skeptical given their behaviour thus far.

 

In terms of suggesting a complaint I take it you are of a mind they will insist its wear and tear but that her only option would be to pay them whatever bill they demand and then try to claim it back through complaining to Peugeot?

 

Have told her to go back in morning, demand a courtesy car (bearing in mind they haven't even looked at the clutch yet, they're just assuming its wear and tear) and then to get them to do their investigation work as soon as they can slot it in.

 

It does sound though from your inference is that if they want to be assholes she'll get stuck with paying a massive bill and then having to argue the toss with some git at Peugeot who is targetted to reduce paying out on claims where possible. Brilliant :-/

 

Thanks for the replies and will update when I hear tomorrow what happens.

 

Point about logging it at Pug is that you can't rely on the garage not being a bunch of muppets and PUG UK will control the process to a certain extent. I doubt the box is at fault as that is a direct mechanical drive and can't cause the engine to rev and lose power unless it's seizing in unusual circumstances. But then there would be a host of other issues as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the GF took a rather odd option without telling me today until she'd done it

 

Went into garage, collected car and took it to another garage to diagnose problem. Sat mechanic in car and within a few tens of metres of driving him around without telling him what the problem was he says "that's a worn clutch, its grinding and slipping, definite wear and tear".

 

Now call me a skeptic but a) I doubt she told him nothing but b) how the feck can anyone say definitely what the problem is without even lifting the f*cking bonnet

 

She's now convinced that she's saved herself the £300 bill of having PUG check the clutch out and also that because someone else said wear and tear that she has zero chance of a warranty payout so she's now willing to pay the £700 for a new clutch.

 

Now I am far from a chauvanist but for f*cks sake today wants to make me ban women from going near a garage. Her complete fear of confronting a "mechanic/semi-trained monkey/knuckle draggin con-artist" and arguing has cost her best part of 3/4 of a grand for a car that has barely even started its life cycle.

 

I cannot decide whether I am more angry at PUG dealership for being awkward scheisters in the first place, my gf for believeing that just because someone wears oily overalls they know better than her or the other garage for their "miracle diagnosis"

 

:( Cheers anyway guys. It's as the saying goes I guess you can take a horse to water but you can't make it listen to common sense if you use a fricking megaphone or something along those lines :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the GF took a rather odd option without telling me today until she'd done it

 

Went into garage, collected car and took it to another garage to diagnose problem. Sat mechanic in car and within a few tens of metres of driving him around without telling him what the problem was he says "that's a worn clutch, its grinding and slipping, definite wear and tear".

 

Now call me a skeptic but a) I doubt she told him nothing but b) how the feck can anyone say definitely what the problem is without even lifting the f*cking bonnet

 

She's now convinced that she's saved herself the £300 bill of having PUG check the clutch out and also that because someone else said wear and tear that she has zero chance of a warranty payout so she's now willing to pay the £700 for a new clutch.

 

Now I am far from a chauvanist but for f*cks sake today wants to make me ban women from going near a garage. Her complete fear of confronting a "mechanic/semi-trained monkey/knuckle draggin con-artist" and arguing has cost her best part of 3/4 of a grand for a car that has barely even started its life cycle.

 

I cannot decide whether I am more angry at PUG dealership for being awkward scheisters in the first place, my gf for believeing that just because someone wears oily overalls they know better than her or the other garage for their "miracle diagnosis"

 

:( Cheers anyway guys. It's as the saying goes I guess you can take a horse to water but you can't make it listen to common sense if you use a fricking megaphone or something along those lines :D

 

Frankly Fell if I was GF of yours I'd be asking to for help on these forums on how to cure a Pathetic Reply And Total Twaddle of male chauvanism.

 

She did the right thing to get another opinion and I for one can tell if a clutch is slipping without lifting the elequently described bonnet, as could quite a few of us who post on here. So rather than the derogatory commentary encourage her to get it fixed the correct way and that would be by taking it back to Pug dealer and telling them the clutch is slipping and she want's it repaired under warranty.And a lot of us have/do wear oily overalls. She should point out that generally Pug or PSA allow 18K miles before enforcing the wear and tear policy and that they should approach PUG UK for a decision as regards to a full warranty replacement or a goodwill contribution. It would not be a good idea to say it doesn't do motorways either, just describe the use as general with a bit of everything. If the car is just used in city/town then answer will be sorry we can't help. As I have said, log the complaint in the nicest possible way and often you will be surprised at what you will get.

 

I take it that despite the low mileage it has a full history as per their terms and conditions as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sorry my post was, as you will guess, made out of frustration and tbh it's better to rant a little on here and then be able to reply in a more calm and rationale manner elsewhere.

 

So apologies for taking advantage of the forums for a bit of ranting.

 

I don't mind that she got another opinion and it wasnt that the guy could tell it was a duff clutch that bothered me it was the "oh it's wear and tear comment". I know little about vehicle components myself hence coming to you guys but I did think that to diagnose the reason for the problem without even looking was a bit far fetched.

 

Tbh my reply was also tinged with the anger at Peugeot's dealership in the area in the way they have behaved towards my better half as I don't like to think people are taking advantage of her. I certainly did not mean any disrespect to the oily overall wearing community :) more a rant at the gits in that particular establishment.

 

The second opinion only reinforced her opinion that PUG would not pay a penny and she has had it fixed by the 2nd garage despite my assurances after reading your comments that she had a reasonable chance of persuading PUG to accept a warranty claim.

 

I think it was the dealership garages quote of £300 to investigate + c£700 to fix with no guarantee of getting it back compared to the 2nd garages quote of £340 to fix it incl of everything that made her mind up.

 

Once again sorry for previously ranting a little and I hope I havent offended anyone when at the end of the day you are trying to help out. That wasn't my intent.

 

Thank you for your kind advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a problem Fell. Take it back, explain an independant has said it's the clutch and follow advice about geting them to contact PUG UK for guidance. Simultaneously log the complaint as when the dealer phones up with the Vin number it will be flagged as a problem case.

 

The difference between warranty and goodwill contributions is based on mileage, service history, ownership and believe it or not the customer attitude.

 

So in the time GF has owned it should have had a service at least once a year. If not it makes it difficult to justify in this particular case.

 

What would also be usefull is to find out exactly what the Pug quote of £700 odd consists of and what the labour content is. The £700 suggests a DMS flywheel but as before not sure what it was fitted to.

 

The rule of thumb is in this case is to take a softly softly approach by getting the details needed. When this info is available it's possible to make a considered analysis of the situation and then start launching French made Exocets if the need arises.

 

It will take some time but it can and does work if played correctly.

 

BTW, you might like to factor in some serious puckering up money to GF if she sees the post as at the moment you need some serious away goals ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as it stands I've just bought her a surprise holiday away so puckering up sorted although I dont think she'll ever see this post :)

 

As for the other she has already told the guy to replace the clutch and is not wanting to bother trying to argue with PUG over the warranty irrespective of the advice.

 

So thank you for your help and again sorry for letting my furstrations get the better of me and being OTT on my posting. I value your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well lets hope the holiday you have booked just happens to be in South Africa this summer or by chance happens to be in Twickenham, Edingburgh, Dublin, Rome or Paris in the next couple of months ;)

 

A couple of things to watch for at repairing mechanics.

 

When the box is out you should ask them to confirm if it is a dual mass flywheel or not before they do anything more. If it is then halt all work and come back here for advice as to how to proceed. If not then let them get on with it but if they say the flywheel needs replacing then proceed with caution as the limits to do this now are very tight and if they do you could end up with more issues than you started with. Years ago there was quite a bit to play with but not now. Apart from that it's quite straight forward.

 

Let us know how it goes and if any queries just post here. Control the situation as it is a potential claim against PUG and not fully dead yet.

 

If the holiday is as above then all I can say is you lucky, devious person of questionable parentage :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...