Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax to Thames Credit to Aktiv Kapital - help wanted!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5238 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

My partner had a loan back in 1999.

 

He last made payment to Halifax back in 2002 but then lost his job and it was passed to Thames Credit. At this stage it was at £10,000

 

For years he paid monthly to Thames Credit.

 

In 2004, the balance was at £10,000

This went steadily up regardless of payments being made.

 

We CCA'd Thames Credit in September 2008. We got the usual "we are waiting for a copy of the CCA" letter through from Thames.

 

Last payment to Halifax in 2002.

 

Nov 2009 - we received from Aktiv Kapital the following:

1) completed 1 page document PERSONAL LOAN APPLICATION FORM

**where it is signed by my partner in the box that says "YES, I would like to take advantage of the peace of mind offered by Personal Loan Repayments Insurance in the event that I am unable to work due to involuntary unemployment, accident or sickness"

 

2) one page Personal Loan Agreement page showing Financial information of the loan. This Credit Agreement Regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 States the following financial information:

 

Cash Loan £9,900

Total Charge for Credit for Cash Loan £3,665.40

Total amount you pay for cash loan £13,565.40

Insurance Loan (cash price of insurance) £2,007.93

Total Charge for credit for insurance loan £743.67

Total amount you pay for insurance loan £2,751.60

You have to pay the total loan and interst by 60 monthly payments of £271.95

 

Annual Percentage Rate 13.900%

Monthly Interest Rate 1.097%

Total Loan £11,907.93

Total Charge for Credit for total loan £4,409.07

Total amount you pay £16,317.00

 

This page has been signed by my partner.

 

So, to summarise, the balance at 2002 ws £10,000. Since then regular payments were made to Thames Credit where the debt never decreased, instead grew in value and today, the letter from Halifax received states:

 

Outstanding Balance £19,070.44

 

First question - the CCA received - a one page document showing the above text in italics, with no terms and conditions attached - does it sound enforceable.

 

Second question - the amount of loan - even if he started to pay it again, I'd be against it - whats the point - the loans gone up by £7,000 whilst payments were being made!

 

Third question - last payment was made to Halifax in 2002, does it make the debt statue barred as he has not made payments to Halifax. Or do the payments to Thames Credit count?

 

Any help, any letter that I should send on his behalf would be gratefully appreciated. Sorry, I can't scan the letters in at the moment

 

Thanks

Twinks

Edited by twinkle1977
forgot my italics

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. we really need to have a look at it. do you have a scanner of camera phone that you can use and then upload them to here using photobucket?

 

2. certainly maybe time to send a sar to see what has been added to increase it - i think you would need to send 2 one to halifax and another to thames

 

3. no, the payments to thames count.

 

 

have you received a default notice and or termination notice?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - the letter is not from Halifax - it's from Aktiv Kapital.....

 

Will scan in tomorrow....... sounds like it's Thames upping the interest again as far as I can tell......

 

Hopefully the agreement is not enforceable anyway....

 

Thanks for your help so far...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

not that i'm aware, i've only been with my partner for 7 years, so what happened before is a bit beyond me. Would that be sorted out from sending a SAR to Aktiv Capital/Thames Credit?

 

I will scan the docs up tomorrow :) Thank you!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Im not very experienced with enforceability of CCAs hopefully someone will come along with more knowledge and have a look.

 

I think you should SAR the Halifax to see if they assigned all rights and privileges to thames/AK. If they had then Thames/AK would have the right to take you to court but if not the Halifax would need to take you to court which I think they would have done by now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the fact that payments have been made for 10 years and the value is at 19,000 whereas when the account was defaulted it was at £10,000.

 

Also - I'm not sure if its enforceable - the CCA paperwork they sent, I don't think its complete (but happy for anyone to respond)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone. Just come home from work and my partners received another letter from Aktiv.

 

At the time that Thames were looking for the CCA (2008 - 2009), Aktiv capital have sent through a statement of account where it shows that in this period, they added £6,251.00 to the account.

 

Is this not illegal?

 

Please help

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is interest and charges that AK have added themselves then NO you DO NOT have to pay the charges, IF however they are only acting on behalf of their clients, Halifax, and it is Halifax who have been adding the interest and charges then, IMO this will be in the small print that was signed for at the time of getting the loan, ie, Halifax will have stated in the T&C's that they are allowed to add X amount of Interest, and charge X amount for arrears, failed payments, late payments etc.

 

So this begs the question whether AK are acting on behalf of Halifax, or under the Law of Property act have indeed bought ALL rights to this debt.

 

Looking at the first sheet of paper it states ORIGINAL COMPANY, so have you ever received a Notice of Assignment?

Who has been issuing you with the 'Statements of Account'? AK or Halifax?

 

Who informed you that AK were now in charge of seeking payments?

Have you spoken with Halifax and asked them?

 

IMO I would now take some time to look through all of my paperwork and file it correctly in order, then SAR Halifax, costs £10 send recorded delivery.

In amongst all of the deforestation they should send you, 'Should' be a Notice of Assignment, which would state who they have flogged the account to, if they have flogged it at all that is.

 

If they have flogged it on, then you should have been receiving, annually, a Statement of Account, showing you payments made, and the outstanding balance remaining, this again would have given you a clear indicator that they were adding on charges, if the debt has not been sold, then AK are up a creek without a paddle, you need to work out how much has been paid over the years, if it clears the initial balance, then AK have some questions to answer, and I would be looking at them answering them in front of a judge.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for your response.

 

Aktiv Kapital have only just arrived on the scene. For many years, it was with Thames Credit and my partner paid them monthly.

 

However, with some success myself, I suggested a CCA to Thames and the account was in dispute for over a year.

 

Now, Aktiv Kapital sent the CCA docs provided further up this posting (but with no terms and conditions). This was November 2009.

 

Throughout all of 2008, the account was in dispute.

 

Aktiv Kapital are now stating that they will send a statement of account every year, but also show a £6,251.11 interest for the period of 2008 - 2009. Interesting - I thought they were not allowed to add on charges when an account is in dispute?

 

Anyway, to summarise - we've only just started to hear from Aktiv Kapital, before it was Thames Credit since 2003/4 time.

 

I will send Halifax a SAR letter on my partners behalf but (sorry to harp on) what about the lack of terms and conditions in the CCA paperwork they sent. Does it comply with the CCA terms?

 

Anything else I should do - all the questions you put to me above, are a big resounding no. never had a notice of assignment, never had yearly statements, balance of account changes with each posting we receive, Aktiv Kapital have told us nothing, just asked us for nearly £20,000.......

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well for starters the interest they are saying they will add to the account is totally unlawful, I will eat this keyboard if any Judge in this country would allow this.

 

I personally, would revert back to square one with AK, and send them the No acknowledgement letter, as Thames Credit nor Halifax ever informed you who was collecting.

 

In fact first off, it would have been Halifax' own in house DCA, Blair Oliver & Scott (BOS) then I would have though this would have been flogged to Thames Credit, who funnily enough I have just found out IS Aktive Cr@pital!!!!!!:-x

About Thames Credit Limited - Thames Credit Limited (UK)

 

Thats complaint one to the OFT, for misleading debtors as to who they.:-x

 

So it has been with Aktiv Cr@p ever since Halifax flogged it on, so I would now ask Aktiv for the last X amount of years worth of SOA', and reduce the payments down to £1 a month, that normally focuses their attention.

 

If you have been paying Cr@ptial for this long then you can safely SAR them to find out exactly how much you have paid them and how much they have unlawfully added on top of the original balance, IF, as I suspect you have cleared the original balance outstanding of 10k or whatever it was, then IMHO I would stop paying them and tell them that if they want the rest of the money they have added to the account in charges alon, then they MUST take you to court for it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to re-write all of that, that was confusing me!!

 

Ok so we have found that Aktiv Cr@pital and Thames Credit are the same company, if it is Thames Credit you have been paying for all these years then I believe it is them you should SAR.

 

Forget Halifax as I think they are long gone and have flogged it to these reprobates.

 

Have you got all your statements showing when you paid them, and how much etc? Can you get your bank to provide this for you?

I appreciate that it is over a very long period, but I am thinking that as you know the initial default sum owed, you have been paying X amount each month for X amount of years, therefore, it is perfectly feasible that you have cleared the original debt.

 

If so and you have the evidence to back this up, then these cowboys can go whistle Dixie for their unlawful charges, I am still of the opinion that as you have never entered into a contract with these, you have never agreed to any of their unlawful charges, and they will find it extremely hard for any court or Judge to enforce their charges on you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...