Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Under the consumer rights act 2015, if a defect manifests itself within 30 days and you have a right to return the vehicle for a full refund. If any defect manifests itself within the first six months of ownership then you have a right to return the vehicle for a full refund subject to the retailers right to carry out a repair. If the retailer declines to repair or if the repair fails then you have the right to return. The problem here is that you have to assert their right. It's a bit ridiculous – but you have to do let them know preferably in writing that you are asserting your rights under the consumer rights act either the 30 day right or the six month right. I suppose that you haven't done this – which would be quite understandable because most people don't know that these rights exist and that they are subject to these conditions – the condition that the right must be inserted. It is frankly ridiculous. The dealers know it and we have lots of instances of this company delaying appointments et cetera and our strong suspicion is that they are simply trying to run their customers out of time. On the basis that you haven't asserted your rights, we now have to look to ordinary contract law. You are entitled to purchase a vehicle which is of satisfactory condition and which remains that way for a reasonable period of time. Clearly it is in satisfactory. They are blaming you. Has your independent inspection identified the reason for the defect? This will be important because as you have seen BMW are already saying it is down to your driving and you are going to have to produce evidence that it wasn't down to your driving and the you drove it absolutely reasonably and it was simply the condition of the car. Have you been without the car for any period of time. Is it driveable now? If the car was off the road for a substantial amount of time and was still off the road then you would be able to argue that this is a fundamental breach of contract and that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract and therefore you will be entitled to treat the contract as breached by Big Motoring World and insist on cancelling the contract. It may be that you will eventually be obliged to keep the car but have the repairs paid for. Have you had any quotations for the work that needs doing? I asked you questions about the MOT – but you haven't responded.
    • A 'violent left wing mob', comprised of a chap in a red hoody with a damp polystyrene coffee cup and a bit of wet cement, gets nowhere near cowering frightened farage some distance away on top of his double decker bus .. as farages security and support seem to film the incident grinning     Farage bravely flinches, grimaces and seems to almost burst into tears as the 'objects managed to travel a part of the way toward his position on top of his bus. His reactions honed by having a bit of milk splash him at a prior incident allow him to swiftly fall into a protective cower and grimace .. .. Sometime after, once the mob of 1 had been safely bundled away, farage apparently wipes his eyes of tears, and rising from his cowed and frightened pose, bravely shouts “I will not be bullied or cowed by a violent left-wing mob who hate our country.” .. however few they may comprise of.   https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/nigel-farage-cement-barnsley-reform-uk-b2560501.html  
    • According to Parkopedia parking is limited to two hours.  I don't know how accurate this is though. What were you doing there for four hours?
    • no its friday 21st by 4pm if you'd done it properly and read the sticky in post 2 it clearly says: ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM  
    • Have had a read up just to double check last day to file defence is 24 June (claim form date is 22 May)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is this from Apex enforceable?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5128 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Update: I sent a letter requesting they didn't contact me by phone especially when I am at work, but they have just called me. They should have had the letter from me by Thursday last week. I will send another one tonight to complain about this and send it recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Update: I sent a letter requesting they didn't contact me by phone especially when I am at work, but they have just called me. They should have had the letter from me by Thursday last week. I will send another one tonight to complain about this and send it recorded.

 

I think you normally have to allow them a reasonable time such as 7 days to update their records to be honest Flubber. I imagine Apex are overloaded with correspondence at the moment. It took them about 7 to 10 days to stop calling me so I wouldn't waste your time or money just yet!!

 

EDIT...FORGET THAT!! THE BARSTEWARDS JUST CALLED AGAIN!!!

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol. While they continue to phone my mobile when I'm at work they just keep on getting rejected... ooops lol.

 

You think they'd have learnt from the one time I spoke to them and I refused to go through the stupid security questions. She couldn't explain why she needed my name when she'd already asked if she was speaking to Mr.......... I chuckled later after she hung up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any suggestions what to do next as Apex have now started hassling again? Do I just sit tight, offer them a low F&F settlement or call them and restart the payment plan I had with Egg?

 

This whole business is confusing the hell out of me :eek:

 

Thanks

 

There is no obvious answer, have you CCA'd them, no doubt it will be a questionable agreement.

 

I've just sat tight and ignored their letters, I'm certainly not going to start another payment agreement, i may offer a very low..like 1% F & F and see what response that gets.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding F&F's, I'm sure I read on another thread that they won't accept less than 80%....but that may have been Egg directly...

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't use a whistle or anything like that. It's one thing to be nasty on the phone or just hang up but to risk damaging a person's hearing is sick, call centre workers get all sorts of warnings about noise levels and hearing.

 

Would you punch a doorstep recovery person in the face? Didn't think so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's one thing to be nasty on the phone or just hang up but to risk damaging a person's hearing is sick,

 

What is sick is the continual harrassment by these companies, especially when no enforceable CCA exists and also they have been told not to call yet continue to do so.

 

Many have been brought to the brink of suicide by such actions and regrettably some have taken their own lives.

 

I am classed as a vulnerable person, due to my disability, and yet Apex continue to call....now that is sick!!

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well don't take it out on the low down employee on the phone then, your beef is with the company.

 

Well, to be honest, I see this as more of an health and safety issue for the company to deal with, as I am sure that it is fairly forseeable that their employees will be subject to abuse, in many different guises.

 

As part of any risk assessment, it should be standard practice to assess what can be done to minimise risk to employees. Acting promptly to cease calls upon receipt of such notifications should be top of the list, especially as it has no or minimal implementation costs.

 

If I had the unfortunate job of working for such a low life company (and I appreciate that some may have little choice in the matter) I would want to know that my employer was taking all reasonable precautions to ensure a safe system of work.

 

Therefore, I see the low down employees beef being with their company and not the poor unfortunate person they have called to harrass.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, 2 letters from Apex today. First one saying I haven't contacted them for 10 days so they are giving me 10 days then maybe passing for pre-litigation assessment. Second is a copy of earlier letter denying they have altered any of the CCA.

 

I have been thinking and I have never had anything from Egg saying they have passed this debt on. What next? A SAR request letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, 2 letters from Apex today. First one saying I haven't contacted them for 10 days so they are giving me 10 days then maybe passing for pre-litigation assessment. Second is a copy of earlier letter denying they have altered any of the CCA.

 

I have been thinking and I have never had anything from Egg saying they have passed this debt on. What next? A SAR request letter?

 

Both myself and Andydd received the pre-litigation letter and then, on the same day, after the 10 days was up, just received another letter stating that they might send one of their doorstep people around. As Andy said in the thread link below, what happened to all the court action??

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/231975-apex-credit-have-bought-3.html#post2817409

 

I personally felt that a lot of Caggers jumped in far too early with the CCA requests as you can normally ignore DCA's for a significant period. As you have suggested Flubber, you are well within your rights to ask them to prove that the debt has been assigned to them and I do feel that Apex should be challenged on this point as they obviously produced the assignment notices that were supposedly from Egg.

 

As I've said before, I think it would be foolish of Apex to commence any litigation on the earlier agreements whilst PT's case is pending.

 

PS...Regarding the CCA, it really depends what they and you are referring to. The one with your signature on will probably be genuine. What you are querying, I believe, is what is supposed to be the current terms and conditions, with Citi's address on. This has been formatted to look like an enforceable agreement with all of the prescribed terms.

Edited by WelshMam2009

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both myself and Andydd received the pre-litigation letter and then, on the same day, after the 10 days was up, just received another letter stating that they might send one of their doorstep people around. As Andy said in the thread link below, what happened to all the court action??

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/231975-apex-credit-have-bought-3.html#post2817409

 

I personally felt that a lot of Caggers jumped in far too early with the CCA requests as you can normally ignore DCA's for a significant period. As you have suggested Flubber, you are well within your rights to ask them to prove that the debt has been assigned to them and I do feel that Apex should be challenged on this point as they obviously produced the assignment notices that were supposedly from Egg.

 

As I've said before, I think it would be foolish of Apex to commence any litigation on the earlier agreements whilst PT's case is pending.

 

PS...Regarding the CCA, it really depends what they and you are referring to. The one with your signature on will probably be genuine. What you are querying, I believe, is what is supposed to be the current terms and conditions, with Citi's address on. This has been formatted to look like an enforceable agreement with all of the prescribed terms.

 

I personally think that ignoring them is the best policy, my only doubt now is that perhaps I should get in early with a very low F&F offer in case PT loses his case and then no doubt Apex and others will be more confident in starting legal action.

 

I feel they peaked a bit early with all their legal threats, I was wondering where they would go after there 10 days warning and as I and welshmam have found out they've made themselves look rather dumb by retreating and going back to a pathetic 'we may turn up on your doorstep' letter,..oohh..I'm trembling.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think that ignoring them is the best policy, my only doubt now is that perhaps I should get in early with a very low F&F offer in case PT loses his case and then no doubt Apex and others will be more confident in starting legal action.

 

I feel they peaked a bit early with all their legal threats, I was wondering where they would go after there 10 days warning and as I and welshmam have found out they've made themselves look rather dumb by retreating and going back to a pathetic 'we may turn up on your doorstep' letter,..oohh..I'm trembling.

 

Andy

 

Have a read of letter 2 on Melbel's thread Andy...unbelievable response from Apex...worry no more if this is the only argument they are able to put forward regarding enforceability!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/231975-apex-credit-have-bought-3.html#post2834986

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a SAR request the other day. They received it on Tuesday.

 

I've just received a letter from Apex (dated Tuesday) that threatens legal action and bailiffs! (attached).

 

Should I ignore them or write to them (again)? They state in the letter that I have had no contact. Letter after letter to them isn't no contact!

 

Help please :mad:

legal action.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey they've responded already... expecting this do you think? lol

 

They've sent me everything they have already sent me. No statements etc yet. One or two bits they've missed in the past but nothing exciting.

 

Do I get in touch with them now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just received a letter from Apex (dated Tuesday) that threatens legal action and bailiffs! (attached).

 

Should I ignore them or write to them (again)? They state in the letter that I have had no contact. Letter after letter to them isn't no contact!

 

Help please :mad:

 

Just ignore them Flubber...I received the same letter at the beginning of February. The next will probably be a red headed Debtors notice followed by a letter saying that they are going to pass the account to solicitors if you don't contact them within 10 days.

 

Just when you think that they're going to "bring it on" so to speak, you'll just get another letter saying that the account is going to be passed to their doorstep collectors.

 

As I've said before, Apex will be awaiting the outcome of PT's court case just the same as us. Thus, I think it highly improbable that they will instigate court action on older agreements just yet.

 

It's just a question of holding your nerve.

 

I also believe that Apex think that we are like lambs to the slaughter as most, if not all of the debtors, had monthly arrangements to pay in force with Egg. They may also have paid a premium for this...eg 12% instead of 10% lol :rolleyes:

 

Andy does have a point insofar as now may well be the time to negotiate a low F&F, assuming that you have the funds, as there is always the possibility that PT's case may not succeed. However, if he does win, then you may well have settled on an uneforceable agreement.

 

In my case, I don't have 2 brass farthings so a F&F is out of the question!!

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Piles of statements received today! Everything seems in order from what I recollect.

 

I suppose now Apex will get back to hassling me! :D

 

I am beginning to think that I should write to Apex and offer to keep the small payments I was making to Egg going or even offer a low F&F settlement!

 

Or should I just ignore them? What can they do next? I am out of options to slow the process down lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am now getting regular letters from Apex threatening legal action and the big bad bailiffs! Do I just carry on ignoring these with no contact?

 

They do their best to intimidate people although, for now, they have stopped calling me. :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

flubber did you take this out in 1999? if so egg agreements back then had "personal limit" and "approved limit"

 

all recent egg agreements have "credit limit" stated

 

and to confirm egg was owned by prudential back then before citigroup

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...