Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • jk2054 - I haven't started a claim with OIC or MIB yet, due to being unable to obtain the name of the other driver.  BankFodder cheers for that, I'll go back to them with this info & update on here when I've had a response
    • Andy thanks for your reply. No i am now being evicted from the house i moved into after that previous post. The letting agent lied to me when they said the landlord would not be selling the house. SHe did not mention that the landlord tried to sell the house last year, i was not told this, 4 months into the tenancy i got the eviction notice. Its obvious they lied to me and used me to fill in the gap between their attempts to sell the house. I have filled in the defence form as it was easy to follow the old one from my previous post. I will post it later on in the hope someone can give it the once over. It has to be in by the end of this month may 31st.  
    • It's a GR Yaris - Finance is with Alphera, who are part of BMW I believe. I'm sure the unit is very expensive to repair, I have even told them I would be happy with a refurbished/reconditioned unit, in trying to be reasonable as well.
    • Without seeing this envelope, document and sticker it is impossible to advise properly. However, just going on what you have told us, there are two ways you can deal with this: !. The easy way. This has the lowest risk but the guarantee of a penalty for speeding.  You can respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box you can explain that you responded to the request for driver’s details but it was recently returned to you, seemingly not actioned. However, you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. You could also ask the court to consider sentencing you at the fixed penalty level (£100 and 3 points) as this prosecution seems to be the result of an administrative problem outside your control. 2. The not so easy way with higher risk. This could see you convicted of the FtP charge but has the possibility that you escape with no penalty whatsoever. You can do the same – plead not guilty to both charges. If you go down this route the speeding charge cannot succeed as they have no evidence you were driving. This comes from your response to the request for driver’s details which the police say they have not got. You can mention in the “Reasons” box that you returned the request for driver’s details as required. You will then face a trial for the FtP charge and you can produced your response together with the envelope and sticker showing it had been returned to you. The risk with this is that if your defence fails you will be fined a week and a half’s net income, pay a “Victim Surcharge” of 40% of the fine, pay prosecution costs of around £650 and have six points together with an endorsement code (MS90) which will see your insurance premiums rocket.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

David Lloyd Leisure, ARC and Trevor Munn - Please HELP!!!!!


MrDan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4934 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I have had recent correspondance from a firm called Trevor Munn LLB Solicitors threatening me with Court action.

The claim is for a Gym membership I took out and had to cancel due to personal issues for which I had to leave the country. I didn't think about cancelling my gym membership immediatley but did so as soon as I remembered but have now incurred costs above £350. For the period they are trying to claim for I hadn't used the Gym once and am wondering if the gym can claim money for a service that was not used?

I find it difficult to understand what my position is on this matter but feel the claim may be unlawful after reading some reports on here which state that the companies in question are a group of cowboys.

I am unsure whether to offer them a payment plan detailing my incomings and outgoings and what I can afford to pay them.

I admit I shouldnt of been so stupid with my finances but was not thinking clearly at the time due to the personal problems I was facing. Any advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

 

Many Thanks in advance.

23r

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are on sticky ground here. You had a contract with them, whether you used it or not is not their problem and by not contacting them with a reason and requesting cancellation, (your reason for cancellation may not even be covered in the contract), you have allowed the contract to continue so they are entitled to payment.

It makes no difference if they are a cowboy company or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have had it due to the contract you signed , these large consortiums like david Lloyd dont care about your circumstances which i thinks is total crap they just want to take your money.

 

I hope you get the result you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

my son is also being harassed by ARC and now T Munn,on behalf of David

Lloyds sports @ Ipswich.He signed a 3 MONTHS CONTRACT at £80 per month,but at the time thought the offer was £80 in TOTAL for 3 months membership.His first direct debit took out approx £80 plus a small joining fee,then when he realised his mistake wrote a letter giving notice to quit his membership(required 1 months notice) Because he then cancelled his direct debit David LLOYD have requested the £160 required for the outstanding 2 months of the contract.Whilst he argued over the clarity over the contract he signed(which he realises he is bound to)he first received letters from debt collector ARC and know their solicitor Trevor Nunn for an additional £130 when he as already informed them he will pay the amount he owes David LLOYD.The solicitors T Nunn have also threatened court action which I have informed them we will contest and asked them for a statement of why these charges have been added.I would greatly appreciate any help and guidance because we believe this case should have been better handled by D Lloyd

Link to post
Share on other sites

my son is also being harassed by ARC and now T Munn,on behalf of David

Lloyds sports @ Ipswich.He signed a 3 MONTHS CONTRACT at £80 per month,but at the time thought the offer was £80 in TOTAL for 3 months membership.His first direct debit took out approx £80 plus a small joining fee,then when he realised his mistake wrote a letter giving notice to quit his membership(required 1 months notice) Because he then cancelled his direct debit David LLOYD have requested the £160 required for the outstanding 2 months of the contract.Whilst he argued over the clarity over the contract he signed(which he realises he is bound to)he first received letters from debt collector ARC and know their solicitor Trevor Nunn for an additional £130 when he as already informed them he will pay the amount he owes David LLOYD.The solicitors T Nunn have also threatened court action which I have informed them we will contest and asked them for a statement of why these charges have been added.I would greatly appreciate any help and guidance because we believe this case should have been better handled by D Lloyd

 

You can't be bound by something that was mis-sold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I am experiencing the same issues with David Lloyd, ARC and Trevor Munn. I had a membership with David Lloyd for several years. I was then posted overseas by work, initially for 12 months. During this time I suspended my membership at no cost. At the end of 12 months I was contacted by David Lloyd to ask if I wanted to restart my membership. I explained to them that I would be remaining overseas indefinitely and so asked for my membership to be cancelled. I have been contacted by David Lloyd, ARC and now Munn subsequently demanding payment of outstanding membership fees.

 

I have been told by David Lloyd that in the small print of the membership contract I signed several years ago was a clause which said that they are entitled to charge me a sum equal to 3 months membership fees if I wish to leave. Suspension of membership up to 12 months is apparently free.

 

My complaints against David Lloyd is that:

 

(1) this clause in the small print was not pointed out to be when I signed up;

 

(2) their membership department never mentioned a cancellation fee at the time:

 

(i) when I suspended my membership for 12 months; or

(ii) when I terminated my membership.

 

I have taken legal advice from a friend who is a solicitor and have been told that consumer protection legislation (Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1994) require that David Lloyd point out an onerous term such as the cancellation fee: it is not enough that the clause is hidden away in the lengthy contract because as an onerous term it should have been highlighted to me as a consumer.

 

I have put this argument to David Lloyd, ARC and Munn but continue to receive "snotty" emails and letters from them (fortunately not calls as they don't want to incur international call charges to reach me). The latest is a threat to issue proceedings in the Northamptonshire County Court. I have been incurring international call charges calling them to discuss! Today I have been told that despite the letter sent several weeks ago threatening court proceedings within 10 days of receipt of the letter, proceedings have been put on hold whilst I try to reach an amicable resolution with David Lloyd.

 

To top this off the sum demanded in each letter keeps increasing - no doubt to cover excessive charges by D Lloyd, ARC and Munn.

 

I am beginning to feel very aggrieved by what seems increasingly bullying tactics by David Lloyd, ARC and Munn. I've only had one letter from Munn so far but if he continues then I know there is the chance to make a complaint to the Law Society about their tactics. If anyone has any ideas about how I can seek redress against David Lloyd and ARC I'd be grateful to hear. At present I'm thinking of a way to publicise my unpleasant experience with David Lloyd to warn others how may be considering dealing with them.

Edited by jimbean
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi. I also have a problem with them. I have had signed contract for 12 months with david lloyd. After 14 months I called main DL about suspending my membership for one month(holiday). They said it's not a problem. But I couldn't reach anyone from my gym. I mean someone from finance dept. Finally after 2 weeks they call me back, telling me that I can suspend my membership for 3-6 months. And also that i need give them 1 month notice. But what I remember, on the document to suspend membership was something about 2 weeks notice but I'm not sure. So I canceled my direct debit and I haven't use gym any more. I was thinking, ok, I did my 12 months and I didn't signed a new contract. So goodbye. Now they want £607. Because when you want to leave, you need give them 3 months notice. No one told me that when I was signing my contract, like many other things. Any ideas what I should do? And sorry for my broken english:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having the exact same problems with David Lloyd, Arc Europe and Munn Solicitors.

I paid 12 months cash upfront (no direct debit) for what I was lead to believe was a 12 month fixed term. Then after 12 months they try to bill me for 3 months notice! An Outrageous underhand practice!

The Office of Fair Trading states that “rolling terms” are unfair and they have told David Lloyd before they need to reduce their notice period too. Most UK gyms are 1 month which they deem reasonable.

I am really keen to hear from people who posted in this chain back in Jan, Feb, May.

What was the outcome?... Do they go all the way to Court? ....Did you pay or are they still chasing , but no Court?...

I have written to the OFT, the Time Trouble Shooter & BBC Watch Dog about these unscrupulous practices.

Please I urge you all to do the same, as the more people that complain the more adverse publicity and the more likely something will get done about this company’s totally unreasonable & unfair Terms.

 

 

Contacts & Articles

Times TroubleShooter

[email protected]

 

David Lloyd won’t budge on gym switch - Times Online

BBC Watchdog

[email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a real requirement or argument for any notice. It's not like an employer who would have to find a replacement, they just thought up a way to rip people off.

 

Just pay the one month and tell them to stuff the rest. If they should be stupid enough to claim the other two months in a court, you will be armed with what the oft has said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have written to them DL, Arc & Munn and told them all they have no basis for their claim, their contract is unfair and does not meet OFT guidelines. Also wrote to BBC Watch Dog last night and Timestroubleshooter. Any others you can suggest?

Is there anyone out there who had a more detailed history of what Munn do next, if anything? Any of the Jan to March posters around? .... Im quite worried that all communication on this issue seems to dry up on the forum after the stage of non-payment where I am now. What happens next? Do they simply drop it and those with issue don’t come back with the ourcome? Is there a Legal Bar Website I can search to see if there are any actual Munn or D Lloyd court cases with an actual ourcome? Thanks

Edited by fairness2010
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Yes, News seems to be they gave up chasing me- so far anyway (3mth+).They have no legal way of enforcing unfair contract terms like this.

They rely on the fact 80% of people will panic when they get the solicitors Munn letter after the Arc threat.

They really are a bunch of unprofessional bully boys.

They should concentrate on what they are supposed to be doing. Offering a professional sports and leisure service without the B*ll.

Write them a heavy handed letter and forget about their threats. Then advise others to cancel and join a proper outfit. Thanks for the post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I joined David Lloyd 2 months ago and just before i signed the contract I asked the member of staff with me; "if i want to cancel my membership i have to give one months notice in writing." the reply I was given was "yes just send us a letter with you membership number and reason". Last month I sent a letter and gave them one moths notice after the month had passed i stopped my DD, I then got a call from david lloyd and they said I can't cancel my membership, I then tried ot explain what i was told and all they said they would send me a copy of my contract. So my question is have I got a leg to stand on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi WinGirl and welcome to CAG.

 

The above post has been answered on your own thread by Conniff.

 

Please don't multi-post or we end up with stuff all over the shop. :madgrin:

 

Thanks 8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...