Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
    • I want to add my 2 cents here...  The purchase of this debt, Perch Group dont absolve themselves of liabilities from the Original Creditor. They should be responsible for dealing with this complaint in response to an Irresponsible Lending dispute.  If the balance is disputed as such in that way - Then they should be referring to the Original Creditor where applicable.    Also if your complaint was written in a way where a template wasnt used or it was rewritten to a similar effect where it wasnt recognisable - Then you probably would have stood a better opportunity at it not getting rebuffed.  To be honest those - Perch and TM Legal are a waste of Oxygen and will say anything to get you to pay.    Ditto on the template. Where did you find it?  Please keep in mind we have to unravel what you have done till now and help build a formal response.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Have copied from other forum as I think I shoud be here ???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

a few thing I wish to put before you I would like some immediate response if poss on the following

 

Am I in the right place to post re Cap Quest, and first credit/Mckenzie hall

Cabot/Fire for starters.

 

The most immediate is Cap Quest, letter stating Stat demand 18 days to respond or else, well got it a few days ago and did not open 22nd is 18 days up.

This letter is not from a court but from them Cap quest.

 

I am 67 and a few probs re loss of job late in life and illness etc.

I have been ill with a lot of worry and thought I was over it a while back when I posted here under another user name and a result could not hold things together to write and post.

I think I am better much better than I was.

 

So am I in the right place to give more detail and ask questions or do I need to be moved and if I am moved please tell me where.

Cap quest said the debt is re Cap 1 bank card 2000 and I have a letter among others where in 2007 they said if I did not pay this that and the other they would take legal action well in 2010 I guess this it.

 

More to follow if In the right place, many thanks in anticipation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're more or less in the right place, however there is a parallel forum called 'Formal Solutions ...' which you should also look at.

 

The Statutory Demand is serious. As you note it is from the DCA directly and (as yet) hasn't been near a court. Once the 18 days are up then the DCA can petition for your bankruptcy - with all the consequences. But we'll put that to one side for the moment.

 

From your explanation the debt may be statute-barred. When did you last make a payment? When did you last acknowledge the debt?

If both of these are more than six years ago then the debt is statute-barred.

Is there any dispute that the debt is owed? Or that the amount claimed is correct?

There is a panel on the SD form which should contain contact details for the claimant. You should try ringing the number as if it isn't answered then the SD is invalid.

 

Perhaps you could describe the circumstances a little more fully.

 

In any case you need to apply to have the Statutory Demand set aside. You have to complete form 6.4. This should be available from your local County Court (I can't find it on the HMCS website). There are some notes here http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/LOC011_form.pdf which you should also read.

Your application needs to be lodged within 18 days of receipt. You now have only a couple of days to do this so hopefully you can get it sorted out very quickly.

There is no fee for submitting this form.

 

Do you know where to find your nearest County Court?

Edited by palomino

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH: this sounds like a phishing trip.

std letter for cap quest.

 

trying to make the alleged debtor contact them on a debt that is most prob statute barred.

 

me, i'd ignore it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI and thanks palomino

 

I have made a 3 or 4 payments in 2007and this is when I am told in letter it was assiged to CAP quest from Cap 1 bank. amount owing is £1500

 

the contact is Barry Davies

 

all rights so I am told passed to Capquest on 27/4/07

 

it was/is a credit card debt

 

I have a letter from them re 2008 where they offer settlement on payment of £950

Link to post
Share on other sites

if CQ are offering a settlement LOWER than what is actually outstanding i bet my bottom dollar they dont have any paperwork.

 

CCA them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH: this sounds like a phishing trip.

std letter for cap quest.

 

trying to make the alleged debtor contact them on a debt that is most prob statute barred.

 

me, i'd ignore it.

 

dx

 

A Statutory Demand is the required precursor to a bankruptcy petition. Telling the OP to ignore it is grossly irresponsible.

I am well aware that the creditor probably won't proceed with a bankruptcy petition but this is not guaranteed.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would CCA them. I got a Statutiry Demand letter from Ruthbridge a few years back and heard nothing from them. I would also definately file the form for court as you do not want it going any further than needs be. (Plus i dont know the rules for courts for the UK)

 

CCA them today and make sure you send it next day recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

huntersinn : the deadline for having this Statutory Demand set aside is approaching rapidly. Hence we need to get moving.

 

Can you help with the answers to the following -

- when is the Statutory Demand dated?

- when exactly did you receive the Statutory Demand?

- how was delivered?

- have your tried ringing the contact? If that person answers then just hang up. If someone else answers then ask for the person named on the SD. If the person is not available or if no-one answers at all then that can make the SD invalid.

- is the amount claimed correct?

- do you know where you local County Court is?

 

The debt is not statute-barred so you obviously cannot use that as grounds for having the SD set aside.

There is now insufficient time left to request any documents that could be relevant , and in any case it appears from what you have described that procedure carried by Capital One and Capquest is correct.

 

Another poster has rightly pointed out that Capquest, by offering a settlement amount less than is now being claimed, have no real intention of proceding to a bankruptcy petition. However we still need to deal with the situation as it stands at the moment and try to get the SD set aside.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it would be nice if we could see a scan of the letter whereby SD is mentioned.

 

i am wondering if this is all it is, just a mention of it, not actually that they have one.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the OP is getting good help here-they need to answer the questions posed.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...