Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aktiv Kapital!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5232 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all.

 

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

 

If this seems long winded please bear with me as this is my first time doing this..

 

Right here goes.

 

I recieved a debt collection letter from Aktiv Kapital in late November 2009 concerning an outstanding loan with Halifax which I had 6 yrs ago and to my knowledge was paid off when I sold my house.

 

I didn't acknowledge the debt and sent them a CCA request letter.

On the 18/12/09 I was sent this from them stating that this was my CCA. please see link:

Yfrog - scan0001zp

 

I then wrote back to them to dispute what they sent as it didnt constitute as a valid CCA as it was just a copy and a bad one at that of an application form also there were no prescribed terms etc and also since I had not heard anything about the loan from the OC about the alledged debt I put in my letter about statute barred...

 

Well today I recieved more correspondence from them which they state is the info I have asked for..Please see link:

Yfrog - scan0001at

 

 

Is what they have sent me today enforceable in court as on each of the "proofs" they have sent have 2 different addresses on it which make me think they have put it together themselves or is it just T&C'S as I have 8 other pages as on the link it says Conditions of use???

 

Please advise as im begining to lose patients with them..

 

Thank you in advance for your help.

 

Smokinjoe2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome, ok you state loan in the opening of your post but the agreement is for a credit card, so bit confused there.

 

also if you are sure you paid off this alledged debt and that it was over 6 years ago then I would not bother with the cca and just send this instead

 

The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

template 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome, ok you state loan in the opening of your post but the agreement is for a credit card, so bit confused there.

 

also if you are sure you paid off this alledged debt and that it was over 6 years ago then I would not bother with the cca and just send this instead

 

The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

template 2

 

Hiya...Thanks for replying

Yeah my mistake about the loan/credit card...

 

That particular letter was sent to them when I was told about staute barred and how it works, however it was after I sent the CCA request letter.

 

Would that have made a difference???

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they are responding with a load of rubbish to the CCA request, but are pretending the statute barred issue doesn't exist?

 

 

I would presume so..your'll have to forgive me as I not as clued up as most on here..should I send the statue barred letter again?

Cause they say there giving me 14 days to agree a payment plan or they will pass it back to the collections dept..

Link to post
Share on other sites

No if you have already sent it then just ignore the rest of the crap they come up with, do not get into the tennis letter game with them, just send a nice letter like this:

 

Dear fool

 

This debt is until proven otherwise Statute barred, sending out application forms or other such items proves nothing, until you can provide me with proof that a debt actually exists then I see no further reason to repsond to any attempts you may wish to make to get in touch with me.

 

I now require by return your official complaints procedure and I will be reporting your attempts to collect on a statute barred debt (if a debt actually exists) to the relevant regualtory bodies.

 

I trust this explains my position.

 

your etc etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

No if you have already sent it then just ignore the rest of the crap they come up with, do not get into the tennis letter game with them, just send a nice letter like this:

 

Dear fool

 

This debt is until proven otherwise Statute barred, sending out application forms or other such items proves nothing, until you can provide me with proof that a debt actually exists then I see no further reason to repsond to any attempts you may wish to make to get in touch with me.

 

I now require by return your official complaints procedure and I will be reporting your attempts to collect on a statute barred debt (if a debt actually exists) to the relevant regualtory bodies.

 

I trust this explains my position.

 

your etc etc

 

 

I like it mate I like it..

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably not, but the next letter should either be a we are looking into it or we have passed it back to the oc and are closing our files

 

 

Ok fair enough....

I dont mean to sound like the glass is half empty sort of person but if by any chance I dont recieve any letter like that or they ignore it like they have done, should I just dismiss any other correspondence they send?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello all...

 

With reference to the Statute barred letter I sent AK, they sent me one back today saying the original defualt was registered on the 19th April 2004 with the original creditor.

 

Aso they have sent me a MATTER HISTORY PRINT in terms of interest and payment..

 

What really, really concerns me is that they are stating that a payment was made on the 8th Feb 2007 via a CHEQUE FROM A THIRD.What does cheque from a third mean?? also at that time I had no job and was living in my car and only had a care of address and to top it of no cheque book..

 

Secondly, in early 2006 I have apparantly paid £25 via direct debt which I have no recolection of ever setting up a DD..

 

What should I do now with this as it doesnt add up because I no the last physical payment I made was back in 2003...

 

Any Advice??

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is alledged that phantom payments are made by phantom payees to keep th clock ticking

 

so write back and state that these 2 payments do not mean anything as you dispute ever making them and require proof of who made them, the amount of each payment and when and where they were made, also for the dd from which bank

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is alledged that phantom payments are made by phantom payees to keep th clock ticking

 

so write back and state that these 2 payments do not mean anything as you dispute ever making them and require proof of who made them, the amount of each payment and when and where they were made, also for the dd from which bank

 

 

So is it common practise for DCA'S to use " Phantom Payments"??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...