Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

02 iPhone Insurance Claim - 02 not paying out - help.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5229 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Hope everyone had a good new year last night and starting 2010 on a positive, unlike me

 

I dropped my iPhone last night in a puddleits water damaged, called up 02 insurance this morning to make a claim and apparently, the IMEI number I'm currently using and the IMEI number they have on their system are two completely different numbers and therefore will not pay out.

 

I cannot recall ever changing iPhone, when I was sold the insurance, surely the IMEI number would have been verified, they are also saying the original IMEI number was used for 1 day of my contract and then the new one has been used for the last 4-5 months.

 

I have been paying my monthly premium of £10 since the date of purchase and cannot believe this is now happening.

 

Could people please advise and help, much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I purchased it from an Apple Store, just been through everything and my original iPhone I signed up with was actually exchanged 24 hours later and replaced with a new one. I have receipts for both iPhones.

 

I did not take out the 02 Insurance at the time of purchase, but took it out at a later date, definitely had the new IMEI number at the time of purchasing the Insurance.

 

Is this a problem? - I have both receipts with both IMEI numbers, surely they have to honour the agreement and replace my iPhone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, phone insurance was purchased through 02 Insurance and it's added to my monthly bill.

 

The 02 Insurance was purchased like 1-2 months later but it is definitely covered...

 

I'm slightly confused now, when I took out the 02 Insurance surely on their system they would have seen I'm using a different IMEI iPhone so why did they not question it then? - I've got both receipts anyway...

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats my point

 

when the second phone was registered by apple, the imei number would be registered to your sim (phone number)

the insurance was taken out later so there is no way 02 should have your old imei on file

 

i think you are being given the brush off

 

this is an 02 frack up

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what do I do then? 02 Insurance is actually closed today... I've been paying my monthly insurance premium while 02 knowing knew that the IMEI's were actually different...

 

Do I have a case? I currently have no phone now and was hoping that 02 would replace it :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy New Year all! :)

 

This problem isn't all that unusual, but (from the insurer's point of view) they need verifiable evidence that they are covering the insured'shandset, and not any other substitute in order to obtain a 'free' exchange for a handset not covered.

 

O2 the network and O2 Insurance are not the same thing. It is a completely separate company (and really, nothing to do with Telefonica). This addresses your issue of 'tey should have known you had changed'. They'd be the last person to know, BUT there will be a document somewhere - probably provided by Apple, to show the originally covered IMEI and the model to replace it.

 

When the replacement is arranged by the insurer, they take care of updating the IMEI of the exchange, BUT if you do this without reference to them, then you need proof to confirm that the handset originally covered was replaced by the one you are now claiming for. It shouldn't be too much of a formality to get them to update their records and swing into action with your current faulty handset.

 

Ever thought it time to try a different handset....? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only place anyone could reasonably FIND this information was from the Airtime Contract, which will note both the IMEI and IMSI codes. This is fine for nealry all situations, except where there has already been a faulty SIM change (or handset).

 

I think you'd call it incompetence, but I cannot see where else they would be able to know what the handset would be, OR whether there had been any swap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nervo,

When you first got your iphone (the original one) it would have had to of been registered and activated... with iphones this is only done through itunes.

So when you first registered your iphone and account with itunes, all IMEI/Serial Numbers are recorded and registered with them. Your itunes account will hold both IMEI Numbers and the dates they were registered (and show the same Sim card/ phone number was being used for both phones).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, iTunes (a third party retail extablishment) would provide nothing of interest to an insurer, who would be seeking a link that connects both devices and a most basic level (dealer, agency etc) who effected the swap. Anything else is invariably too far removed and (reasonably) simple to fabricate, even assuming they woukld accept it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...