Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Secured Welcome Loan - Help!


Gram1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4734 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

Just had a thought - We have had 3 or 4 loans with Welcome, some secured, some unsecured over the years. Each one was settled before taking out the next one etc.

 

This goes back quite a few years and it is only with recent loans that i have been aware of ppi and have been choosing not to have it. So i reckon there is a good chance at least one of the older Welcome loans will have had ppi on it.

 

How can i find this out? Will Welcome still have details of old settled loans going back as far as 8 years ago? Its probable that one of the secured loan was from our previous address that we moved from over 5 years ago and would be in my wifes maiden name.

 

I dont have any details or loan numbers for the old loans so not sure where to start. I would love to find out if any of the old loans had ppi and if so if i can claim it back.

 

Cheers for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have they always done the ppi for welcome, even years ago?

 

i thought i read some posts about direct group never having heard of people who have got ppi with welcome and it turned out welcome had done something themselves with the ppi - or am i getting myself confused?

 

Basically if i phone this mob up, and tell them of the names/addresses of where we lived, do u reckon from this they can tell if welcome have ever given us ppi on any of our loans, even if i dont know the loan numbers?

 

And if they have, and these are loans that we have settled, would we be able to claim back for the full amount of ppi included in the loan? Not sure how it works, or are we stuffed because the loans are now settled?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks for that. It has only been 5 years since the 1st loan was closed so hopefully they will still have the details.

 

i have a feeling there was def ppi on it, so even if the loan was settled in full, can i now claim back the full ppi part of it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can be up to 7 years depending on when the tax year ends I believe. Either way you're well within.

 

As for reclaiming PPI I would imagine that would be subject to limitation also meaning you're again fine, but perhaps this is different as it's an insurance, perhaps governed/protected under different law? Perhaps a call to the FOS would make things clearer as believe PPI can fall under their remit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the fact they probably made large commissions on such deals (which should be obvious on paperwork resulting from a Subject Access Request)

 

not a chance on sar

they just spout corporate sensativity

 

you need this for them to comply

 

most important sent recorded delivery

 

 

 

xxxx

Xxx

Xx

Welcome financial services

Compliance

Ruddington fields business park

Ruddington

Nottinghan

Ng11 6nz

 

1/01/2010

 

 

Account number

 

I write with regards to the above account with your organisation.

 

I respectfully request that you provide me by return a copy of the credit agreement which bears my signature. I require this as i have reason to believe that there may be discrepancies within the agreement which may leave it improperly executed. Additionally I require the underwriting sheet and any reference to welcome elite brokers. These documents to show any commission paid to you by the broker or by you to a broker.

 

obviously if the agreement is improperly executed i would be entitled to ask the court to consider the agreement and make a declaration of the rights of parties to the agreement.

 

I must stress this request is NOT made pursuant to section 78 Consumer Credit Act 1974 but is made pursuant to the Civil Procedure ( Pre action protocols and Part 31.16) and therefore unsigned copy will not suffice, only a copy of the original contract in its unaltered form will suffice in these circumstances

 

Please confirm if you still hold a copy of my signed agreement and that you will provide me with this document.

 

I do not view this as an unreasonable request given that by supplying the document which i have asked for it will allow me to assess if my case has merit and will help to resolve matters possibly without the need to involve the court and will undoubtedly save costs on both sides

 

I look forward to your reply and would ask for a response by 4pm on 21/01/2010

 

 

Regards

 

xxxxxxxx

 

Right, came home today to Welcome's reply to the above letter.........

 

It basically said that i needed to enclose a £1 fee for the statement of account, and £10 if i wanted SAR and that they wont process my request

without them.

 

I thought what i sent wasn't a SAR request and that they had to comply with it?

 

What now?

 

cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FORMAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

CPR part 31.16

Dear Sirs

 

Account number

 

On XXXXX I wrote to your organisation requesting that you supply me a copy of the agreement for my account. My request extended to the full agreement which bore my signature. Additionally I require the underwriting sheet or other document showing any commission paid to you by the broker or by the broker on by you to the broker.

 

The request was made pursuent to cpr 31.16, not under the data protection/consumer credit act.

 

I enclose a copy of the letter which was sent for your information.

 

I note that the reply received on xx xx xxxx from your organisation is far from acceptable.

Your reply was to enclose a £1.00 fee for a consumer credit agreement request or £10.00 for a data subject access request. I have yet to receive a true copy of my agreement which I requested. In view of the circumstances I do not feel it unreasonable to ask for this document to be disclosed, it is not commercially sensitive nor is it a restricted document and should be easily accessible for an organisation such as yours. Therefore I would ask that you provide me with a copy of the contract which bears my signature. I require the complete document with all its parts.

 

the reasons why I require this information are clearly set out within my original letter dated XXXXX , but for clarity I require this document for the following reasons

 

1.I require this as I have reason to believe that there may be discrepancies within the agreement which may leave it improperly executed

 

2. Because I believe that the Payment protection insurance was not correctly incorporated within the agreement

 

3.because I believe that there was a commission paid in respect of this agreement which has not been disclosed to me and therefore is a breach of agency law

 

4. I have in my possession underwriting sheets with reference to welcome elite brokers so I require a true response to my request for the underwriting sheet.

 

 

since this matter is likely to be subject to proceedings and govern that your organisation is likely to be a defendant in any action which would be brought by me, I must draw your attention to civil procedure rules part 31.16(3)©&(D) which gives the court the power to order you to disclose this document to me.

 

The disclosure of these documents will allow me to consider any claim I may have against your organisation and will allow for the matter to be dealt with possibly without the need for costly litigation. Therefore I again ask that you provide me with the documents which I have previously requested. I don't not consider this request unreasonable and therefore if you fail to comply with my request I will be left no option but to make an application to XXXX county court for an order made under the provisions of CPR 31.16 ordering you to disclose the documents which I have requested.

 

additionally I will ask the court to make an order for my costs in bringing this application and reserve the right to disclose all communications in this matter before the court should such an application become necessary

 

Please confirm by no later than 4pm on XXXXXXX that you will comply with my request or if you will not comply, please provide your reasons in writing

 

I am amazed that compliance for a major company cannot understand a data subject access request and a consumer credit agreement request with a request made under civil procedure rules.

If you are unable to understand this request may I sugest you pass this request to you legal department.

 

Regards

 

XXXXXXXXXX

 

 

 

 

with this send a copy of the last letter and a copy of there reply

 

cretins

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...