Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The car makers used parts made by a supplier banned over alleged links to Chinese forced labour.View the full article
    • I need to get a hamster. lol
    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Chris against LloydsTSB


tscw1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

so i should just go ahead and file a lawsuit? (and a letter saying "In directing your customer to switch from an ongoing county court lawsuit to the Banking Ombudsman, are you Lloyds TSB, sir, trying to demonstrate contempt for the county court judge, contempt for the law of England?")

 

i havent taken any further action since i received this letter as the response i got confused me as when i have read faq's and other posts the letter they sent me dosent seem to be their standard response!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds, and to my knowledge Capital one, ALWAYS try to deflect claimants to the Banking Ombudsman, no doubt they have reason to expect a better outcome for them. It IS a standard response, as is "this is our final response on the subject etc" -- final until the bailiffs are poised to march into their branch.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if you look through most of the threads re ombudsman..it's not helped and people have pursued their claims through the courts.....

It would seem to be yet more delaying tactics..so I'd keep on with the claims through the courts if I were you....

1/6/06 request charges

16/6/06 received charges

18/6/06 first request for refund

3/7/06 "No" letter from bank

13/7/06 LBA

7/08/06 handed claim to court

10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue

24/8/06 deemed to be served

25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service

6/9/06 defence served

9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me

25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission

25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ

26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari

29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"

18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !

verbal offer of full settlement with conditions

communications rejecting conditions from me

5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions

7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc

14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LloydsTSB have entered a defence according to Moneyclaim website, I'm now waiting for the AQ

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/24662-chris-against-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Prelim sent via email: 18/08/2006, rep 22/08/06

LBA sent via email: 31/08/2006, rep 04/09/06

Claim started 15/09/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got the N149 Allocation Questionnaire and it has to be returned to Gateshead County Court 08/11/06. I'll be filling this in and sending it this week. I have a pdf copy of the N149 form, could I hand that in? as I can type into that one

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/24662-chris-against-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Prelim sent via email: 18/08/2006, rep 22/08/06

LBA sent via email: 31/08/2006, rep 04/09/06

Claim started 15/09/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

The defence of LloydsTSB is as follows:

 

Claim number 6QZ64179

Claimant Christopher Wilson

Defendant: LloydsTSB PLC

 

Defence:

1.The Defendant LloydsTSB Bank PLC (the bank) is a Bank whose registered office is 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2v 7HN. It is admitted that the Claimant has been a customer of the bank at all material times.

 

2. By opening an account with the Bank, the customer enters into a commercial arrangement with the bank for the provision of banking services. The bank is entitled, as part of that arrangement, to charge for those services. At account opening a customer is provided with details of the Banks charges, currently in a leaflet a guide to our banking charges. By using the account, the customer acknowledges that the charges are incorporated into the contract. For personal customers, a number of services are provided for free, not withstanding that they are an expense to the bank. Such services presently include, but are not limited to, providing;

cheques

bank statements

the facility to make payments by direct debit and standing order

debit cards

ATMs (Cash machines).

3. By maintaining the account in credit, or within any limit agreed by the bank, the customer may avoid most if not all charges. If the customer fails to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments, whether by cheque, debit card, standing order or direct debit, the customer makes a request for a payment to be made from the banks own funds. If the bank makes payment, or returns the payment, it provides a service as specified in the leaflet and makes a charge in accordance with the terms of the contract. On page 1 of the leaflet, the bank explains that there are normally no charges for everyday banking at LloydsTSB when your account is in credit.

When you use an agreed overdraft, there is no monthly fee and we only charge interest on the amount you are overdrawn each day. Where you go overdrawn without an agreement or where you use special services, such as copy statements, we will make a charge. This guide explains how these charges work, and when they will apply.

If you want to use a service that we haven't listed we'll tel you the cost of that service before you give us the go ahead.

 

4. There is no breach of contract; the charge cannot be a penalty, consequently there is no requirement that the charge be a pre-estimate of the banks loss.

 

5. The customer is given advance warning of charges being imposed; statements show the charges, if any, the customer has incurred during the cours of the month, and which will appear as debits on the following month's statement. Customers are warned by letter when they go overdrawn or over their agreed limit without arrangements with the bank. If the customer fails to remedy the position, and payments such as standing orders and direct debits are refused then again the customer is warned by letter.

 

6. The charges are fair and reasonable, and it is denied that they are unlawful.

 

7. The customer is notified of the charges in plain intelligible language at the conclusion of the contract, and on each monthly statement. The charge are terms which relate to the price payable by the customer for a service provided by the Bank, and pursuant to Regulation 6 of the unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, and are not subject to the assessment of fairness.

 

8.in the premises:

8.1 the charges are for banking services, and are not damages nor a penalty;

8.2 the Bank is entitled by contract to impose the charges, which are fair and reasonable;

8.3 It is denied that the charges are unlawful or contravene any statute or regulation.

 

9. The claimant's claim is denied in it's entirety. It is further denied that the Claimant is entitled to the sum claimed or to any sum from the bank.

 

To me that defence looks very weak, but only because I've had the assistance of this website

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/24662-chris-against-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Prelim sent via email: 18/08/2006, rep 22/08/06

LBA sent via email: 31/08/2006, rep 04/09/06

Claim started 15/09/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent the following fax at dinnertime today:

 

my contact details

Claim no: 6QZ64179

25 October 2006

Sechiari Clark and Mitchell

Department SO, P.O. Box 499

1 – 5 Queens Road Quadrant

Brighton, East Sussex

BN1 3XJ

Dear Sir:

I am writing with reference to claim number 6QZ64179 for which I have just received Lloyds TSB’s defence from you.

I am aware that you will be busy due to a lot of very similar cases involving a request for repayment of charges levied by LloydsTSB PLC, due to encouragement by various national TV programs and websites. Although you will not be able to discuss individual cases with me I am aware that your client has offered several claimants an early settlement before the Allocation Questionnaire has been returned. Therefore I am wondering if your client would like to offer a settlement before I enter my Allocation Questionnaire which is due on 08/11/2006.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Yours sincerely,

Christopher Wilson

 

Enclosures: a current list of charges

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/24662-chris-against-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Prelim sent via email: 18/08/2006, rep 22/08/06

LBA sent via email: 31/08/2006, rep 04/09/06

Claim started 15/09/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

tsc...

take off your personal info asap

 

on above letter......

1/6/06 request charges

16/6/06 received charges

18/6/06 first request for refund

3/7/06 "No" letter from bank

13/7/06 LBA

7/08/06 handed claim to court

10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue

24/8/06 deemed to be served

25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service

6/9/06 defence served

9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me

25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission

25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ

26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari

29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"

18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !

verbal offer of full settlement with conditions

communications rejecting conditions from me

5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions

7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc

14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I sent off the AQ and they should of recieved it in Gateshead County Court today

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/24662-chris-against-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Prelim sent via email: 18/08/2006, rep 22/08/06

LBA sent via email: 31/08/2006, rep 04/09/06

Claim started 15/09/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well I got contact from Gateshead County court and it's been delayed until Feb 07 so we can settle out of court. Even though I put I didn't want that in my AQ. I'll type up the exact wording etc at home tonight.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/24662-chris-against-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Prelim sent via email: 18/08/2006, rep 22/08/06

LBA sent via email: 31/08/2006, rep 04/09/06

Claim started 15/09/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't need to type it up as I've received a full settlement offer, which I've accepted, even on their ridiculous claims that the charges are fair.

 

Hopefully some money will be winging it's way to my bank account just in time for me emigrating :)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/24662-chris-against-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Prelim sent via email: 18/08/2006, rep 22/08/06

LBA sent via email: 31/08/2006, rep 04/09/06

Claim started 15/09/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well a week on and no money put in my account from Lloyds TSB yet! Even worse I got home yesterday to find a statement from Lloyds TSB to tell me I'll have £30 charges coming out of my account on 02 Jan 2007 for overdraft excess fees.

 

Which is odd as I've never been over my overdraft limit. I even scoured my statements and apart from a £3 EBay charge which put me slightly over my limit, but way short of the £10 leeway limit.

 

So off to LloydsTSB and a query why I would be charged £30 (I didn't mention the legalities of it, didn't want to put their noses out of joint just yet) and was told that LloydsTSB have CANCELLED their £10 leeway and were going to charge me £30 for a £3 bill from EBay, hmmm. I said it was a bit harsh, so a manager invited me into his little room and said as I didn't know they had cancelled the £10 leeway they would reimburse me the fee (well cancel the fee as it's not due until Jan), great I said, he deleted the £30 fee with a simple delete button and typed in a reason in the new box, saved it, closed it and then asked "have you ever had a charge refunded before?", well yes I replied, I'm waiting for LloydsTSB to refund me all of my charges for the past 6 year about £1100 but it's not in the bank yet."

 

It went a bit frosty after that :)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/24662-chris-against-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Prelim sent via email: 18/08/2006, rep 22/08/06

LBA sent via email: 31/08/2006, rep 04/09/06

Claim started 15/09/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, the same happened to me, I phoned up lloyds and asked why i was getting charged £30 for being £6 over drawn, they said thet they've stopped the £10 buffer plus they have now stopped the fact that if you do go overdrawn and pay it off the same day you'll still be charged £30!

They are bleeding Thieves!!

 

They said there is nothing they can do even though I wasn't made aware they'd done away with the £10 buffer!

 

I'm going to go to the local branch and ask for it back as you've done Chris!

 

Thanks

 

Haglem

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure what the correct narrative is to say this, but i adored your last message and am still smiling about it. I woudl have loved to have seen the person's face when your said you were waiting for £1,100. B***** marvellous - it is those little things that make your day.

 

Regards

 

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...