Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

returning the car?


confusedasusual
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5276 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Right this is my first time posting on here so forgive me if this has already been covered.

My husband and myself went and bought a 51 plate renault laguna estate with just under 54000 miles on it last saturday 60 miles away. When my husband picked it up the indicator stork was not cancelling itself so the owner of the garage asked him to give him an hour and he would get it replaced. So off he toddles to the nearest cafe to have a drink and wait. When he returned the indicator was working, however on the journey home he found out it was not cancelling itself again when indicating left. Also the car has built in satnav which the owner of garage set up with the directions for home on it. Once out of the town my husband realised that it actually was not picking up any signal and that it wasnt even picking up the location but a location some 100 miles away. Now my husband would have gone back but he had my brother in law following him and had to get home for work.

Once he got home there were more concerns, a rattle from behind and the steering pulling to the right. My husband rang the owner and he asked him to bring it back in and he would deal with it.

 

Today we took the car to a nationwide centre for a free health check and a diagnostic check as the emissions light came on.

 

The report came back as:

BRAKES

FRONT DISCS WORN AND PADS 60% WORN

DISC FRONT PR

PADS FRONT

REAR DISCS WORN AND PITTED ON INNER FACE PADS NEW

DISC REAR PR

PADS REAR

S+S

N/S/F STEERING RACK ARM HAS PLAY IN IT

OTHERS

CRACK IN BATTERY COVER

ENGINE MISFIRING CHECKED FOR TROUBLE CODES FOUND TWO STORED 0114 AND 0145 MISFIRE CYLINDER 4 AND MULTIPLEXED NETWORK NO SIGNAL

SUSPECT COIL PACK, PLUG LEADS AND SPARK PLUGS FOR MISFIRE

TROUBLE CODE 0145 REQUIRES TAKING TO DEALER TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE.

 

All these have AMBER next to it which says - some concerns registered. if not rectified these items need monitoring to ensure safety and/or reliabilty and prevention of added costs.

 

What i want to know is does anyone think we have grounds for a full refund? We have got a full 3 month warranty but the place we took is the place it would go and they have said that it needs to go to a proper renault dealership to have it fixed so this is obviously not covered in the warranty.

 

We paid £2550 by debit card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you not test the car before agreeing to buy? Were the faults pointed out at that time?

 

I think you need to remember it's a used car but must be roadworthy. The brake report does not ring any alarm bells. On a car of this age and mileage it's quite possible to have play in the steering arms, the question is how much and is it excessive. Nationwide thinks not.

 

Cracked battery cover..... it's a used car.

 

Engine faults need looking at but are not necessarilly signs of faulty cars. If they've pressure washed the engine prior to sale and not dried it out correctly then it's possible to register these sort of faults. The codes just register occurrences of faults and it does not mean that that part is actually faulty.

 

Get the light turned off, sometimes it can be cleared by disconnecting the battery for 3 mins and then use. If it comes back then start to pursuit the dealer.

 

The indicator switch though, not sure myself but on an 8 year old car I think you might be asking a bit too much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what your saying but the owner said that if we returned it he would sort out any problems rather than go through the warranty if possible.

However a whole new problem has arose. On the way to taking it back my husband was accelerating when the rev counter shot up and went to the maximum. Husband lost control of car, nearly ended up in a ditch and then finally got it under control again and managed to stop the car and switch engine off. He tried to start car again and it jsut kept shooting up to the max. Owner is now apparently coming on monday to pick it up and leave us a courtesy car and said he will do anything which needs doing.

Now to me that is a dangerous fault and if it had happened when i was driving with our 2 children under the age of 2 i am 99% certain i would have been in the ditch.

 

Just dont know what to do whether to just let him come and fix it and thats that or to persue it to get a refund with it now having a dangerous fault.

 

If any one can give any further advice i would be very grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what your saying but the owner said that if we returned it he would sort out any problems rather than go through the warranty if possible.

 

When you say the 'owner', are you talking private sale or did you walk into a dealer and make the purchase?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a privately owner garage. Not a private seller and not a huge dealership like ford evans halshaw or something.

 

That's ok, as long as he is a legitimate trade. If the garage has a name, would you like to pm it to me and then I can do a few checks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

first of all thank you for your replies.

 

The car was taken away to a local renault specialist who infact told the owner of the garge that it was more or less knackered. The owner rang us and has given us a full refund on the car which is good news.

I think he plans on now selling it at auction or something as its jsut going to cost him too much money to fix. We sent him a rather nice letter and it outlined that if i had of been driving when the revs stuck then this would have been a whole lot worse. Think he realised there was nothing more he could do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...