Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That's fine.  The important thing is to show Kev you're trouble and so best to drop you like a hot potato. Invest in a 2nd class stamp tomorrow - all Kev is worth - and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Do not under any circumstances plead guilty until we know what we are dealing with. It's a sure way to 9 points. The tried and tested way to handle this is to plead not guilty to both charges and offer to plead guilty to speeding provided the "Fail to give information" charge is dropped. But I am concerned about this "ticket refused" sticker. I've never heard of this before. A "ticket" is not a term used in connection with speeding offences. There seems a distinct possibility that your response was received by the police but one thing worries me: I've never heard of a sticker being placed on a response and it being returned "Return to Sender". t's just not what ticket offices do. If you could post a picture of this document and the sticker it might help.  If you can show the response was received you may have a defence to the "Fail to Provide" charge (provided you completed your response properly). If the police are saying you did not respond they cannot succeed with a speeding charge (as they have no evidence you were driving). But if you did not respond, who put the sticker on the document and sent it back yo you?
    • lolerz, many thanks for your reply and correcting my big mistake, oh dear start again. They sent the section 48 along with the Form NO 6A, it was sitting on top of the paperwork, sorry about that. SO they have sent me a Form No 6A and i have received the court paperwork with the claim form and defence paperwork.    
    • Hamster Bedding. Ignore.
    • Hi, below is a draft of the letter Address: Hugo Martin Director of Legal and Company Secretary EVRi Parcelnet Ltd trading as Evri CAPITOL HOUSE, 1, CAPITOL CLOSE LEEDS LS27 0WH REQUEST OF CONTRACTS      Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in regards to the ongoing small claims case ____. In your Defendant’s response you make reference to a pre-existing commercial agreement between yourselves and Packlink (2.7). In that, you claim to have a clause removing customers third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. I would like to request a copy of this contract and confirmation of the date on which the exclusion of third party rights term was included in it. If you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. I also notice that you have destroyed tracking information due to "lapse of time" in line with your data protection policy (2.12). Can you share where this data protection policy is disclosed to customers? I also ask you to forward you a copy of that data protectiono policy, and again if you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. Kind regards,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

N150 assistance needed...please? / **WON**


NGEddie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4738 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok... if they have cancelled the SJ hearing you need to get back on the phone and state that you are setting aside the discontinuance under the CPR as stated...

 

Then get an N244 filled in ASAP and chuck it in their piehole.

 

Don't forget court staff are not legally trained and if they don't know it, well, they don't know it.

 

Make them understand!!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 685
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I cant see on here

 

PART 38 - DISCONTINUANCE - Ministry of Justice

 

Where it says they need our permission? I am probably missing it as am wound up now and reading too fast.

 

So anoyyed they have removed the SJ date

 

They don't... is the simple answer. Well, not in your case anyway.

 

Doesn't matter though... they have the right of discontinuance. You have the right to oppose it. The court will then decide!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not good - they shouldn't do that when you have an outstanding application waiting to be heard.

 

Agree with VJ & Donkey. Time for an N244.

You are applying to set-aside the discontinuance.

Reasons as per VJ's & Donkey's* cB's posts.

 

The alternative is to hit them for big costs for discontinuing. You could actually get an easier ride with this than trying to persuade a Judge why you are not wasting his time by setting aside a claim to them strike it out ...... you could be on a sticky wicket if you get a bad judge.

 

How important is your credit rating - that is really the only issue that would stand unresolved. They would be mad to apply to court for permission to claim again when they discontinue in the face of an SJ hearing.

 

In BOS -v- Mitchell the claimant withdrew at the last minute and they got seriously stung for costs.

 

However I can't see any reason not to put in a bill of costs £600+ & ask for an undertaking from their client to remove adverse credit info and undertake not to litigate on this matter in the future, otherwise you will apply to have the discontinuance set aside.

 

You will need to show to the Court that you have tried to 'be fair & open'

 

sorry this is a rambly post

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my case HFO discontinued... I hit them with a bill for costs and the hearing to assess them is on the 19th May.

 

However, as they discontinued because I proved they were not the owners of the account... I submitted a new claim under the Data Protection Act and under the CCA for the right of a creditor to terminate an account unlawfully and then pass it on.

 

The claim was accepted this morning... so they will have to answer to a Judge one way or another ;-)

 

So what I am saying is that if you want them to suffer... hit them with Wasted Costs and then use £30 of your costs to hit them with court action like I have.

 

That way you will get them into court on the issues :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, my god my head is killing me now, lol

 

The credit rating does not matter one bit, my Dad is too ill to work so does not want and cannot have credit again.

 

With the attitude of the cretin I spoke to at the court, it makes me think how well would it go if as you say I got her husband as the judge :p

 

Totally confused now!

 

I do believe they will try again at some point though, but really how can they on a terminated account?! surely any further DN would be invalid again, and so on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The credit rating does not matter one bit, my Dad is too ill to work so does not want and cannot have credit again.

 

With the attitude of the cretin I spoke to at the court, it makes me think how well would it go if as you say I got her husband as the judge :p

 

Ok so, go for wasted costs - there is an excellent thread by SufaceAgentX20 on how to do them.

 

Write a letter as per the thread and that's it. If they reject it then you just make another application, but IMHO anything up to about £1k they'd be very silly to reject. (would cost them £300 to reject it and then they'd get hit heavily by the Judge for wasting their time)

 

The cap for LiP costs is 2/3 of the cost had you been represented. £1500 would not have got you very far in this case ......

 

That's the easiest way out and you get your out of pocket expenses back and a few quid in your pocket for your time. You are entitled to those costs, it is not you trying it on, it is the 'penance' they pay for wasting your time.

 

Once you get the cheque have a well deserved beer and a donation to the site would be a great way of showing your appreciation for the help and advice that you have received :)

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually feel a lot better now :)

 

Something you said back there clicked, they have more than likely put on the bottom of the letter about going for another bite as an idle threat in the hope we would call and pay them, as if they thought they had a good chance of winning they would not have pulled out!

 

So can I get my £75 back from the court for the N244 SJ application?!

 

The way I saw it when I sat back and looked, IF they had won and got a CCJ, IF they had tried for a CO and got it, then the house is in joint names and the debt is in one, so to my understanding would have just been a restriction? I believe is the phrase, then no plans to sell the house, and if so the 14 day thing would have hopefully got through and would have been sold without giving them a penny anyway, but thats speaking alound and not even relevant!

 

Ok then, next task, find X20's thread and go with that option, if one way I was weirdly looking forward to court, maybe to put it to bed, but in another you never know the outcome.

 

So todays thought...no action required to rush to the court today for set aside, lol, I think you have sold me on the idea of accepting and try for costs, at the end of the day it was about £300 arrears, does that get stopped from costs if we got given them? then anything more we got I will happily, and would have if it has gone to court and we had lost, make a decent donation to the CAG, go team, lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have sold me on the idea of accepting and try for costs, at the end of the day it was about £300 arrears, does that get stopped from costs if we got given them?

 

Eddie ...... listen carefully I shall say this only vonce ;)

 

You have won, you don't pay them a penny they have to pay you for taking you to court with a 'fanciful claim'

 

cB is waiting in the wings to change the title to won once it's been determined which route you are going down.

Maybe the title needs changing to 'Won and now Eddie's thinking about it' ;)

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gh2008 is spot on... it doesn't matter what they claim anymore... they have discontinued. Read Part 38 CPR again:

 

Discontinuance and subsequent proceedings

 

38.7

 

A claimant who discontinues a claim needs the permission of the court to make another claim against the same defendant if –

(a) he discontinued the claim after the defendant filed a defence; and

 

(b) the other claim arises out of facts which are the same or substantially the same as those relating to the discontinued claim."

 

 

 

A Judge will need to see extraordinary evidence why they would seek to bring a claim on the same facts/documents etc.

 

You owe them nothing... they have litigated and given up... you win!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have attached an example of mine.

 

12 calls !!! Harassment ;)

 

I am following your thread - it's great :D

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, ok yeah I should accept it really shouldnt I, lol :)

 

Do you happen to know where X20's thread about costs was please? I had a look but couldnt see it, and do I need to do anything now within a time limit?

 

Totally different case here, but quick question, default written 11th December 2009, must pay by 29th December 2009, sound valid to you?!

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know... I'm terrible.

 

I can't wait to get this judgement against them to be honest. It will happen hook or by crook. We have 5 other identical cases lined up if other CAGGERs have the cajones to see them through.

 

Someone had to take a stand though...might as well be me :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally different case here, but quick question, default written 11th December 2009, must pay by 29th December 2009, sound valid to you?!

 

Could be; need to see the document first to definitively state one way or another.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, in that case could you guuuuuys please take a look here for me :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/238227-told-we-had-payment.html#post2839803

 

I will post up the DN shortly, but am trying to work out if to call them today or not?

 

Dont want to confuse the 2 threads!

 

Cheers!

 

E

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasted costs links :-

 

 

Have a look at the pdf's that Surfaceagentx20 has attached at the bottom of the post on a letter for wasted costs -

 

Surfaceagentx20 wasted costs

 

also

 

Liabilty for Costs CPR 38.6

 

Sharpman v Nationwide credit card services ***WON WITH WASTED COSTS***

 

Welcome/Cohens - case withdrawn ***WOO-HOO ***

 

have a look at this post by IGNM on costs as well -

 

IGNM post on costs

 

and a B_R_W post on what else you can claim - B_R_W additional costs you can claim

  • Haha 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw this on another thread and thought it sounded ok :-

 

I received your letter dated 06th November 2008, the contents of which have been duly noted.

 

As your Client has decided to discontinue with the claim, I am, therefore, pursuant to CPR 38.6 (1) respectfully asking that your Client pay the costs which I have incurred as a result of this claim. The sum of which I feel are reasonable.

 

Time Spent Researching The Consumer Credit Act 1974 and The Regulations 12hrs

Time Spent Researching And Reading Case Law 8hrs

Time Spent Drafting Defence And Amended Defence And Allocation Questionnaires 8hrs

Approximate Total time Spent at the Litigant in Person rate of £9.25 per Hour 28hrs

 

These time scales are a conservative approximation. I feel that I have spent much more time than this however. I am, under the circumstances trying to remain reasonable.

 

Other costs incurred:

 

Printing, Stationary and Postage £12.00

Letter writing between myself and Drydens - 2hrs £19.00

Total other costs £31.00

 

Litigant in Person Costs 28 hrs @ £9.25 per Hour – £259.00

Other Costs Incurred - £31.00_

Total Costs - £290.00

 

I respectfully request that this sum be paid by way of cheque to me within 21 days. Made out to Mr Sharpman.

 

------------

 

Is it worth using this and sending to the solicitor?

 

and also thought if to put I am considering a set aside of their discontiuance unless they pay up and agree to not bring the case again?

 

Cheers

 

E

Link to post
Share on other sites

or something with this in as well :-

 

I received your letter dated 06th November 2008, the contents of which have been duly noted.

 

I would advise your client that, as I have complete and valid defence to the Claim your client has raised against me, that any further attempts at proceeding further collection activities against me will leave me no option but to apply for the discontinuance to be set asidelink3.gif.

 

However, if your client will agree to discharge me from the alleged debt and remove all data from my credit filelink3.gif held at any and all agencies that this information has been passed to then I will gladly accept their Discontinuance.

 

I trust you will convey this information to your client promptly.

 

---------

 

This site is so cool, lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go for costs, you said before the credit file is not a problem (and it is also the far harder to pursue option)

 

You seem to have left off lots from your costs - have you seriously only spent 28hrs on here!!!

 

Who paid the £75 for the application?

  • Haha 1

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eddie ...... listen carefully I shall say this only vonce ;)

 

You have won, you don't pay them a penny they have to pay you for taking you to court with a 'fanciful claim'

 

cB is waiting in the wings to change the title to won once it's been determined which route you are going down.

Maybe the title needs changing to 'Won and now Eddie's thinking about it' ;)

 

Eddie, which ever letter you send.. dont forget to say you want your costs as well :grin::grin:

  • Haha 1

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

 

Yeah going for costs 100% now, I paid the £75 myself to the court, I best check if its come out of my bank actually, if not do I call them?

 

So shall I start by send a letter to their solicitor or do the N252?

 

Cheers!

 

E

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You seem to have left off lots from your costs - have you seriously only spent 28hrs on here!!!

 

Who paid the £75 for the application?

 

I see what you mean now, lol, no that was just pasted from another thread I found, mine is 128 hours ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok mate, cheers, thats without a hearing though correct?

 

So do I need to actually break the costs down or can I throw a figure in, for example each week day off ive spent here, since December, thats 14 odd days, I know I read max of £50 a day, so thats £700 right away, not forgetting easily 2 hours a night most nights, thats a lot!

 

How do the courts see this normally?

 

I wondered if to try the solcitor first, then guess would have no choice if they dont pay up than N252, oh and also is there a time limit you must apply by?

 

Cheers!

 

E

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...