Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gross Misconduct- Appeal pending, what can we do


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5297 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

My wife was dismissed for gross misconduct, she is appealing against the decison , under the following grounds ( working for a bank)

 

1 it states in her procedures that a copy of the summary report & any related documents must be sent to the employee in advance of any heraing. ( she was not sent any documents ),

 

2. it states in her proceures & policy bookelet that the leter inviting her to the earing must contain the seriousness of the alliagtions & the posibility that she could be disssmed ( again they did not do this)

 

3. The decison was harsh as aother members of staff who had there hearing after her were for the same offence were only given final written warnings ( these others were conducted 2 weekes after my wifes)

 

can someone tell me what the chances of winning an appeal are , and also the chances of winning at tribuneral ?,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what needs to be considered is this -

 

Had the employer followed proper procedure, would they have arrived at a different decision?

 

It's my understanding

(and let me emphasise that I'm not a legal professional, just a lay person with practical, industrial experience of employment law)

that in employment law there is a principle known as 'The Polkey Principle'.

 

Simply put (I put things simply not because I'm assuming that you're simple, but because I know that I am), if an employer fails to follow correct procedure in dismissing someone, but it is considered that had they followed procedure the end decision would have been the same, then whilst the dismissal will be considered unfair from a procedural point of view the dismissed person will only be entitled to a reduced amount of compensation, or quite often no compensation at all.

 

Google 'Polkey' and have a look. Someone who went to school will probably explain it far better than me.

 

So that I think needs to be looked at.

Obviously I don't know the facts of your wife's situation.

 

On a practical basis, you may well be able to embarrass/frighten them into changing their minds with the failure of procedure.

You said she works for a bank, so presumably a big operation with HR. They have no excuse for cocking up disciplinary procedures.

 

With regard to your 3rd point, something to bear in mind is that the other members of staff might have different disciplinary records?

If they didn't have 'previous' and your wife did, that might account for the discrepancy in the outcome.

Obviously I don't know. If your wife has nothing previously against her name, then the inconsistancy of outcome in this matter then becomes a strong arument that she can use.

Edited by elpulpo
Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely elpulpo, if the misconduct that all 3 were accused of was deemed to be gross misconduct, then the only reasonable outcome of all 3 disciplinary hearings would be dismissal.

That's what happens when you commit gross misconduct - you get fired. No?

Link to post
Share on other sites

alll

 

my wife has worked there for 3 years blemish free,

 

the procedures state " in advance of the meeting, a copy of the invitaion to the meeting a copy of any documentaion & reports that are relevent to the employee and ther case"

 

the argument would be if we were in possesion of all the material we could have been better prepared & also maybe resighned.

 

my main thing is to get her employment record clear agian , as it has gross misconduct on it. money is not the main reason for the appeal

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok here's the detail

 

she acidently used someone else's login to change a customers details , the person's who's login she used was serving the customer & she was next to her. her collegue walked away from the terminal without login out , and my wife carried on serving the customer

 

it was then found out that the customer she served was a fraudulant customer. the person had false documents . and were linked to another member of staff that had been sacked ( imediadley before my wife was , so but the others who had done the same as my wife have been just given final written warnings , as there hearings were on a different day , the same manager has heard the dissaplinarys )

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's clear that the bank has not followed statutory disciplinary procedures , they also have a duty to treat all colleagues fairly and be consistant in their treatment of all employees....they can't dish out verbal/written warnings to one person and sack another for exactly the same offence...thats blatantly unfair treatment,especially as you have a clean disciplinary record.

Dismissing someone for gross misconduct should only be done if all other avenues are exhausted and this is something the Tribunal would expect the bank to follow.

Be sure to bring these points up at your appeal.Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

some new info

 

my wife was dissmissed for gross misconduct and is apealling against the decison

 

the reasons for the are , in the company proecdures it states that all documents & reports relating to the incident must be sent tp the employee in advance of any dissaplinaty meeting , they did not do that and refered to the documents that she did not have sight of.

 

in procedures it states that the letter inviting her to the dissaplinary must give the possibity of the worst sanction that coykd happen , again they did not do this

 

we are still awaiting the documents that they relied on as the appeal is pending,

 

one of the fundermental items they stated that it system details o a customer were changed on someone elees smart card by my wife ,and they refered back to cctv stills of that time ( they have still not shown at any stage the pictures) . we have now found out and are getting in writing the time on the cctv was wrong and it was not my wife who changed the infomation.

 

they stated that as a result of her actions the bank lost money do to fraudulant activity , again we have found out that there was no loss of funds , ( we will have confirmation of this in writing)

 

we have also been informed by a manager un offially that any sanction given out at a dissaplianry that did not follow procedure or coreect documentation must be redcued on appeal.

 

i don't want to get my hopes up but i really need to now what the likey outcome would now be

 

(we have just stated the process of legal papers if she dose no win as a lawyer has agreed to take the case on on a no win no fee basis)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just make sure your well prepared at your appeal,put your points across and try not to be intimidated.

Ask for disclosure of all the evidence and ask that you are given a reasonable amount of time to seek advice.

From what your saying your wife wasn't at fault here so I can't see how they can sanction her at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...