Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just going through our records, in order to retrieve unjust bailiffs charges (thank you for the info fellow caggers) we have came across a final notice from Marstons, dated feb this year, for a PCN that I incurred doing a job 2 years previous. to cut a long story short, they appeared at the door one morning in Feb when I was at work and my wife answered the door, she was told that he needed full payment there and then, or the van was just round the corner, and they would enter to remove goods. My wife was in a panic and had to borrow the £343 fee. No levy was placed, no entry was made, and my wife never signed anything. Also, the car involved is registered to me, and I am the owner, plus I admit me getting this PCN, but can my wife be forced into paying my debt, and should the bailiff have let known to her the details of the debt without my permission. Help appreciated.

Never mind, it could be raining!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the bump reallymadwoman, I've tried searching the site for anything relevant, but can't find anything yet.

Also, after talking to the wife about it today, she informed me that the bailiff arrived just as the kids friends were calling for the kids, and the bailiff continued to discuss my affairs in front of both my kids and their mates, and seeing the state that their mother was in, they were really worried all day at school, and ran home after to make sure mum was ok.

I intend pursuing the inflated fees from the bailiff, but I'm not sure where I stand with my private information being talked about in front of any third parties.

Never mind, it could be raining!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not some whizzkid but will try and understand this:

 

First of all, (with a bit of humour) who pays a fine? The husband or the wife? It is ALWAYS the husband. The wife is always perfect, does not do anything wrong and if you do not want burnt food, accidentally burnt clothes while being ironed, to be in the doghouse and constantly nagged then it is obvious the husband always pays.

 

Now off to see what you have............

 

Just going through our records, in order to retrieve unjust bailiffs charges
First one. Have you been issued with a court summons for this alleged debt? (Notice I use the word "alleged"). Secondly have you been found guilty and a CCJ made against you? Third have you failed to pay the fine within the stipulated time AFTER the court ruling? IF ANY OF THEM ARE MISSING then it is NOT bailiffs you had calling at your door but debt collectors. READ THE OFT GUIDELINES re debt collectors posing as bailffs and also how debt collectors can and cannot knock on peoples doors.

we have came across a final notice from Marstons for a PCN that I incurred doing a job 2 years previous.

That to me tells me that it is NOT a council PCN that you have but it is an INVOICE from a [problem] beggar company like Civil Enforcement Ltd (just use search at the top to see how much of a lowlifes they are). IF it had been a council PCN then it would not take 2 years to get taken to court. (Hence read posts how [problem] parking companies are loved on here.)

they appeared at the door one morning in Feb when I was at work and my wife answered the door, she was told that he needed full payment there and then, or the van was just round the corner, and they would enter to remove goods.

Totally against OFT Guidelines.

My wife was in a panic and had to borrow the £343 fee.

Defo not a council PCN. Never heard of a council PCN for £343.

Also, the car involved is registered to me, and I am the owner, plus I admit me getting this PCN, but can my wife be forced into paying my debt, and should the bailiff have let known to her the details of the debt without my permission. Help appreciated.

You NEVER admit or say who the driver was.

 

The question: You say your wife paid the con artists. Shame on your wife (sorry to say that) but if I was to knock on her door while you are at work or out and demand £300 saying I am a bailiff will she also give me that money? She should have told them that you are out, she does not see people unless you are there and to move. PLUS for bailiffs to enter they have to have a court warrant of entry.

 

Hence the question is: What exactly do you want to do? Your wife paid them (ok..... she paniced but she paid them).

 

Thanks for the bump reallymadwoman, I've tried searching the site for anything relevant, but can't find anything yet.

Also, after talking to the wife about it today, she informed me that the bailiff arrived just as the kids friends were calling for the kids, and the bailiff continued to discuss my affairs in front of both my kids and their mates, and seeing the state that their mother was in, they were really worried all day at school, and ran home after to make sure mum was ok.

I intend pursuing the inflated fees from the bailiff, but I'm not sure where I stand with my private information being talked about in front of any third parties.

Two points:

a: How come this happened in February and you are asking now? Bit too late in my opinion.

b: Once again it was not bailiffs but a con artist posing as a bailiff.

 

To be honest, fair enough your wife did not know the difference between a court appointed bailiff and a con artist working for a private parking company. BUT they have been paid. It is now a matter of your word against theirs. And I doubt they will admit to saying they broke the OFT guidelines and even possible other laws.

 

The best thing is to learn a lesson. Tell your wife to remember that any strangers knocking on the door she must tell them to return when you are present. Also UNLESS you see a proper court document (and not just a photocopy either) it is not a bailiff and even the police cannot enter your home unless they have a court warrant OR there is the chance of personal harm happening to a human being

 

It is also advisable to read the OFT Guidelines and also the Debt collection guidelines (e.g. how you can tell a debt collector to shift and if they do not then you can call the police). As to Private Parking Companies learn to ignore them.

 

Last but not least, unless somebody can say otherwise, the ONLY options you have are:

1: File a complaint with the OFT. Then again, it will not get you any money back.

2: Issue civil proceedings in the County Court against them. I would not really suggest this as, it will be your wifes word against theirs and, as I have already said, they will not admit to breach of guidelines. Most probably they will say that she apologised and gave them the cash, a cup of tea and also chocolate buscuits. As for the kids being witnesses, I doubt the Court will allow that they testify due to age.

 

 

Sorry not best info but I dont believe in building peoples hopes for nothing.

Edited by nick20045

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally who is liable to pay?

 

As shown, none of you were liable to pay as it was a [problem].

 

Who is guilty of making good for this loss then?

 

You can blame it on your wife for panicing and paying. Then again, your wife will blame it on you for a: not educating her in these matters b: protecting the children and c: protecting your home as she deemed best. d: her job is to look after the home and the children. you are responsible for other matters

 

Let us see: Husband has one reply. Wife has: 4

 

Wife wins. :D:D

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you know the date of the parking ticket by any chance

I'm not to good with parking tickets if this is wrong someone please correct me

 

have i read your first post correct this parking ticket was over 12months

i found this on the Ministry of justice web site so i thought id post it as i wouldn't mind finding out myself for future reference can they enforce a parking ticket thats over 12months old or do they have to re-issue it first

Part 75 TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT

Warrant of execution

 

75.7

 

(1) An authority seeking the issue of a warrant of execution must file a request –

(a) certifying the amount remaining due under the order;

 

(b) specifying the date of service of the order on the respondent; and

 

© certifying that the relevant period has elapsed.

 

 

(2) The court will seal the request and return it to the authority.

 

(3) Within 7 days of the sealing of the request the authority must prepare the warrant in the appropriate form.

 

(4) No payment under a warrant will be made to the court.

 

(5) For the purposes of execution a warrant will be valid for 12 months beginning with the date of its issue.

 

(6) An authority may not renew a warrant issued in accordance with this Part beyond the 12 month validity period but, subject to paragraph (7), an authority may request the reissue of a warrant during the 12 month validity period.

 

(7) Where the address of the respondent has changed since the issue of the warrant, the authority may request the reissue of the warrant by filing a request –

(a) specifying the new address of the respondent;

 

(b) providing evidence that the new address for the respondent does relate to the respondent named in the order and against whom enforcement is sought; and

 

© certifying that the amount due under the order remains unpaid.

 

 

(8) Where the court is satisfied that the new address of the respondent given in the request for the reissue of the warrant relates to the respondent named in the order, it will seal the request and return it to the authority.

 

(9) The authority must prepare the reissued warrant in the appropriate form within 7 days of the sealing of the request to reissue.

 

(10) A reissued warrant will only be valid for the remainder of the 12 month period beginning with the date it was originally issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you know the date of the parking ticket by any chance

I'm not to good with parking tickets if this is wrong someone please correct me

 

have i read your first post correct this parking ticket was over 12months

i found this on the Ministry of justice web site so i thought id post it as i wouldn't mind finding out myself for future reference can they enforce a parking ticket thats over 12months old or do they have to re-issue it first

Part 75 TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT

In my opinion, fair enough if it was a council parking ticket issued by say a traffic warden.

 

But, this looks like it was a Private Parking Company. With a Private Parking Company it is a contract that is entered into and not a PCN. Hence I would take it that Traffic enforcement does not apply.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know the bailiff company that carried this warrant out.

By law they should of showed your wife ALL paper work with regards to this debt, ie warrant plus a breakdown of the fees they are charging plus their identity. Have you had any letters from parking company for this or any letters from bailiff company to say that they are coming? You should of at least had something sent from a court before any bailiff can act with regards to any parking fines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I should have made things clearer.

These bailiffs (Marstons) were collecting for an unpaid PCN. Notice from council was received, stating penalty charge had not been fully paid, therefore amount now due was £105.

next was a letter from Marstons saying;

Penalty Charge £110

Letter Fee £11.20

Bailiff Fees £0.00

VAT £1.68

Total Amount Due £122.88

 

Next was call at the door to my wife, saying amount due was £343.33, no

levy was placed, no documentation signed, only the threat of a van appearing unless full payment was made there and then. An increase of £220.45 for one visit, with no van, and no breakdown of fees.

 

Unfortunately my wife borrowed from a high interest lender to pay off this bailiff, leaving us even further in debt.

 

My gripe is not whether I was guilty for the PCN, it is the way my wife was treated in front of our kids, whether it is legal to basically force some-one to borrow money to then just shift the debt to another lender, and the fact that between a letter and a visit, the debt had increased so dramatically, to add round about 180 % for 1 visit.

 

The fact that it has taken me so long to get advice on this matter is quite plain, if you would only look to the left where it says "cagger since".

I only wish that I had found this boxfull of advice and help a while back.

 

TOTN

Never mind, it could be raining!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did she get a receipt for the money? Something to show the amount claimed has been settled in full?

 

If NO then once again she did the wrong thing. How can she know they will not come again demanding money? She has no proof.

 

If YES then you course of action is to get it assessed by the court.

 

Hopefully somebody else will come along and give some more advise. But up to now, that is what I have personally read.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Nick,

yes she got a receipt, but no itemisation on it, but bless their little cotton socks, they were willing to let her off with £3.33 if she paid cash.

I want to know if I can still pursue recovery of unfair fees, and what kind of chance I have.

 

TOTN

Never mind, it could be raining!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If YES then you course of action is to get it assessed by the court.

 

thanks Nick,

yes she got a receipt, but no itemisation on it, but bless their little cotton socks, they were willing to let her off with £3.33 if she paid cash.

I want to know if I can still pursue recovery of unfair fees, and what kind of chance I have.

 

TOTN

Answer was already given to you.

 

Also, although on here you get some very wise and helpful advise, there is also what is called "Google is your friend".

 

Bailiff charges & fees

 

From: Bailiffs & Council Tax - How to Deal With a Debt Collecting Bailiff

 

BAILIFFS CHARGES

You may be able to complain about bailiffs charges. The amounts they are allowed to charge for council tax and poll tax are set out in the schedule on page 5. The amounts they are allowed to charge for council tax are set out on the next page in the schedule. There are lower fees for poll tax collection. These are shown in italics. If you feel you have been charged too much you can complain in writing to the Council and the bailiffs. You may be able to ask the County Court to look at the charges for you see below. Phone us for advice.

You can find out what is 'reasonable' by making enquiries on a local basis. For example, if you have been charged £80 for attendance with a van, and local enquires indicate you could hire a van for a morning for £40 this is clearly unreasonable, especially as it is likely that bailiffs will be visiting several properties at once, and many companies own their own vans.

In the first instance, complain to the bailiffs themselves. You can tell them you know their charges are excessive and that you will be taking further action if the charges are not reduced to the levels shown in the schedule.

* You can then complain to the council as the bailiffs are acting as agents of the Council. There have been recent cases that have been taken back in front of the Magistrates Court over these issues, with the result that the councils have been forbidden to take any further recovery action, or in other words, the debt has been written off. So it IS worth complaining.

* You can apply to the County Court for the costs to be checked. This is called "Taxation". The court can look at a complaint within 12 months. They will decide if the charges are excessive or not. There is a fee to pay to the court for this application. If the court decides not reduce the bill at least 20% you can be liable for the bailiffs firm's court costs. You need legal advice first.

USEFUL LINKS

The Secretary

Association of Civil Enforcement Agencies Kensington House

33 Imperial Square Cheltenam

Glos Tel: 01242 241456

Website: www.acea.org.uk The Secretary

Enforcement Services Association (ENSAS) (formally The Certificated Bailiffs Association) Ridgefield House

14 John Dalton Street Manchester M2 6JR Tel: 0161 839 7225 Website: www.bailiffs.org.uk

Local Government Ombudsman (England)

Millbank Tower Milbank

London SW1P 4QP Advice Line: 0845 602 1983

Monday to Friday 9.00 am - 4.30 pm. Website: www.lgo.org.uk There are 3 Local Government Ombudsman offices for England. Please contact the advice line to check where to send any complaint.

Local Government Ombudsman (Wales)

Derwen House Court Road Bridgend CF31 1BN

Tel: 01656 661 325 Website: www.ombudsman-wales.org

 

 

From:How to reclaim unfair bailiff charges

 

If you have been overcharged on fees by a bailiff company, you can claim back unfair charges.Before making a claim against a bailiff company for any unfair charges, the debt must have been settled before you bring a claim.

To give yourself the best possible chance of recovering unfair bailiff charges, ensure you have the following:

 

    1) original documents supplied by the bailiff
    2) payment receipts
    3) bailiff company documents outlining charges and visit details
    4) correspondence from and to the bailiff company.

A waiting period of around 60 days can be expected once a claim with the bailiffs has been raised. A Company has 40 days in which to reply to your request. The good news is many bailiff firms settle promptly prior to court due, which in itself highlights the need for stricter controls on charges and fees.

If you receive anything less than copies of original documents from the bailiff company, inform them of your rights under the Data Protection Act. A request for original documents outlining charges and visits, is referred to as a Subject Access Request (S.7). An S7 is pursuant to Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998, which the bailiff company must comply with by law.

In the even the situation become increasingly trying and bailiffs ignore your correspondence, a second letter can be sent if they do not comply within the 40 days limit. It is advisable to impress upon them once again, that you are fully aware of your rights and they have failed to comply with the Subject Access request. No more than 7 days should be granted for bailiffs to comply with the Subject Access guidelines. After which file your case against them in court with no further notice.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am trying to give a link to a site but dont know why it keeps coming up as a different site altogether. So.......... _http://www.bailiff adviceonline.co.uk (remove the space between the "f" and the "a" when you paste into your browser before you hit enter. If it shows as a direct link, then you can use "Quote" and copy it from there.

 

From that site:

 

Example of Bailiff’s Fees for PCN’s

 

In the following examples, we have provided you with the amount of Statutory Fees that bailiffs should charge when enforcing an unpaid Parking Charge Notice (PCN). Under the Bailiff Fees section of our Downloads area, you will find full details of these charges, together with a brief explanation and suggestions also, if you wish to disput the “reasonable fees”.

Original Parking Ticket: £100. If paid within the discounted period of 14 days: £50. If unpaid, original debt of £100 increases by 50% to: £150 Court Fee: £5 Warrant of Execution amount: £155 The amount of £155 is passed to the bailiff to collect. If you pay on receipt of a first letter you should pay: £168.16 If you pay when a first visit is made you should pay: £222.84 Original Parking Ticket: £80 If paid within the discounted period of 14 days: £40. If unpaid, original debt of £80 increases by 50% to: £120 Court Fee: £5 Warrant of Execution amount: £125 The amount of £125 is passed to the bailiff to collect. If you pay on receipt of a first letter you should pay: £138.16 If you pay when a first visit is made you should pay: £182.97 Original Parking Ticket: £60. If paid within the discounted period of 14 days: £30. If unpaid, original debt of £60 increases by 50% to: £90 Court Fee: £5 Warrant of Execution amount: £95 The amount of £95 is passed to the bailiff to collect. If you pay on receipt of a first letter you should pay: £106.20 If you pay when a first visit is made you should pay: £143.10 Original Parking Ticket: £40. If paid within the discounted period of 14 days: £20. If unpaid, original debt of £40 increases by 50% to: £60 Court Fee: £5 Warrant of Execution amount: £65 The amount of £65 is passed to the bailiff to collect. If you pay on receipt of a first letter you should pay: £78.16 If you pay when a first visit is made you should pay: £111.06

 

Other bailiff info available on that site as well.

Edited by nick20045

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...