Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
    • Paula Venomous refused to resign for 16 months and eventually did only because a doctor threatened to resign. Interesting snippets and insights in the article. Paula Vennells clung on to ‘plum’ NHS role after Horizon scandal ARCHIVE.PH archived 19 May 2024 21:49:07 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need some help with Lowell Portfolio


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Have registered after finding via Google and need some help with Lowell Portfolio after reading lots of bits and pieces about them. Also after reading about them I am not going to post any details as they appear to trawl the forums looking for people so I am going to be specific without identifying.

 

Recieved a letter from them Saturday regarding a debt with a mobile phone company I had problems with a few years ago.

 

Basically, I was in real financial difficulty and a direct debit got returned unpaid. I phoned them about it and explained and all seemed OK, when I could I rang them to pay and paid off the outstanding balance, when I spoke to them and tried to set up a direct debit they told me that as it had gone overdue the only way I could do it was pay £xx or set up a new direct debit which would result in a new 12 month contract being started. Being a bit green to all of it, I set up the direct debit but argued the point about the 12 month contract and was told that they would look into it and come back to me, they never did.

 

After being in debt management for a while and generally getting back on top of things, I checked my credit file and the mobile company (major provider) has registered a default on my account a couple of years ago. Was going to contact them about it when this letter arrived.

 

So at the end of the day, although I don't agree with the way the mobile company handled it, I do owe the money and don't dispute that.

 

Whilst debt collection agencies are not new to me and I do stand up to them, the horror stories about Lowell have me a bit worried as through some bad advice from Harrington Brooks when I was stupid enough to be in a debt management plan with them, I have a few defaults which will be past the 6 year point in the next 12 months so at least I had stayed out of trouble for a while and my credit file was getting in better shape.

 

After reading about Lowell/Red they seem to be complete ******** so I don't want them adding another Default on my account.

 

Whilst although the mobile provider didn't get in touch with me, the default is on there from them so I can't really dispute it too much as I have no letters from them or anything to back up the conversation and they won't speak to me as it's in the hand of Lowell.

 

So, whats the best way to deal with them? Was going to send them a letter offering a full and final settlement offer of 50% based on the agreement they don't sell the debt on (as it seems they do), any default is removed that they (not the mobile provider) place on the account and send it in someone elses name not mine so they can't come back to me. Is this a good way to deal with it or are they just going to say no and start harassing me like they seem to with everyone else?

 

The other alternative is just to tell them I am in debt management and it's either the 50% full and final or they can get the money over however long it's going to take them to get it (think 3 1/2?)

 

Anyone had dealings with them where they haven't had problems after?

 

Any advice is very much appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Welshman_42

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi & welcome to CAG.

Firstly, stop speaking to them on the phone & refuse to answer security questions if they ring you.

A direct debit should never be set up with any DCA as they can take what they want that way.

Others will be along soon with their own responses for you ;)

 

Hi,

 

Thanks for the advice.

 

Have not rang Lowell yet as there are so many horror stories it seems amazing they haven't been shut down and everyones advice is that way so although I was going to phone them, I decided definitely that was not a good way to do it.

 

Everyone seems really helpful here from what I have read so I look forward to getting some advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the time being it may be best to send them a 'prove it' letter http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/573-general-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt The onus is on them to prove a debt exists and they have the right to collect it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are one of, if not the worst DCA in this country - they are well known on this forum by many of the Caggers.

Not speaking to them on the phone is golden rule number one.

They will say/do anything to get you to pay up.

Although mobile phones are not covered by a CCA - they still need to prove you owe the debt, so a "prove it" letter might be a good starting point for you.

Knowing Lowells...its unlikely they have any proof ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are one of, if not the worst DCA in this country - they are well known on this forum by many of the Caggers.

Not speaking to them on the phone is golden rule number one.

They will say/do anything to get you to pay up.

Although mobile phones are not covered by a CCA - they still need to prove you owe the debt, so a "prove it" letter might be a good starting point for you.

Knowing Lowells...its unlikely they have any proof ;)

 

So even though it's been logged on my credit file (and I kind of know about the debt even if I don't agree with it) from the mobile phone company I can still ask them to prove it?

 

Also, it seems very likely from what others have said they will put a default onto my credit file so if they do and cannot provide proof of the debt, where do I stand getting it removed?

 

Thanks for your advice and time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can ask them to prove it anytime you want.

Report Lowells to the OFT,trading standards & the info commissoner - thats standard practice for Caggers anyway :D

The credit reference agencies are only too willing to assist the DCA's when it comes to putting defaults on credit files unfortunately.

But with a bit of persistant complaining to all the relevant authorities..it can be removed ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the best action is to send the prove it letter, see what comes back and take it from there and under no circumstances, talk to them on the phone?

 

Absolutely right.

 

There is no need to pay these sponging parasites a penny. They have supplied you with nothing and even if the original creditor was owed money, they have long since received a substantial tax credit from writing the account off. If the account is not already statute barred, it soon will be, at which point any reference to it will drop off the credit reference agency files.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had dealings with the various trading styles of the Lowell Group regarding a purported mobile phone account (never had a contract phone and never with the company claimed!) - I've had all the usual threatograms, postcards, etc. Thought things were going well when I received the buy-back offer (supposedly from Red but printed on Lowell paper!).

 

But now it appears that Lowell's have changed tactics because they have 'instructed' Philips to collect this imaginary debt - so Philips have had the barrage of letters including bemused, doorstep collection, S10, etc

 

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi,

 

Me again!

 

Lowell Portfolio have had the 'Prove It' letter and still not come back to me to be able to supply documents that show the debt.

 

In the mean time, I have had 3 or 4 letters stating they are trying to get the information but it all dates back to the 20th October 2009.

 

The Default has been transferred from the mobile company to Lowell Portfolio on my credit file too.

 

Is anyone able to recommend the next steps to take? Is it possible to get the default removed as they have been unable to provide information on me owing the debt or is it just better to leave it and put up with it?

 

Thanks in advance for your help, yet again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The next step is to just ignore them until such time as they come up with proof of the alleged debt. If they continue to harass you report them to Trading Standards and the OFT for chasing a disputed debt.

 

Unfortunately getting them to remove a default is virtually impossible :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as they haven't altered the dates then the default on your CRF will remain, they only stay on there for a maximum of six years.

 

However if Lowlifes have altered the date of default to when they bought/chased the debt then that information is incorrect and WILL have to be ammended, incorrect info on your CRF currently attracts a £1000 damages fee, ONLY IF you are brave enough to sue them.

 

I am just waiting for the day I can take a DCA to court:D

Not that my CRF is of any concern to me and I fail to see what all the fuss is about with them, just another Americanism. But I would love to get them to pay me some beer tokens!:p

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...