Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP! Lowell Portfolio 1!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Arrived home today to find a letter from the above company claiming that I owe £457.49 and that the debt was bought from Vodafone.

 

Airtime debt - £266.98

Early Termination fee - £190.51

 

I had a phone about 4 years ago with Vodafone (that I cancelled 4 years ago) but since then I have heard nothing at all from them. This has come as a total surprise.

 

I phoned Lowell up and stated I knew nothing about this and in the process handed my phone number to them. I was threatened over the phone stating that not paying is affecting my credit rating! I'm scared I'm going to be harrassed about this through an endless tirade of phone calls and then this is going to affect my credit rating...

 

I told them I'm not paying a debt that comes as a complete surprise after 4 years.

 

What should I do as I literally have no idea about this, I have no idea who they are and as far as I knew the contract was cancelled with no hiccups.

 

I'm after any advice

Edited by Jimpeccable
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells are bottom-feeders in the debt collection world who waste a large quantity of paper each day writing inane threatening letters and certainly aren't worth losing any sleep over.

 

They buy impaired accounts that have been written off by the original creditor, normally for less than 10% of their face value and then try and collect the full amount on these whether they are enforceable or not (usually not) by sending a series of threatening letters under various different trading names including, Lowell Financial, Red Collections and Hamptons Legal. These are all the same organisation and despite the implication, Hamptons are not solicitors. They actually have no legally qualified employees working there at all.

 

Fortunately most of the staff they employ have the IQ of a root vegetable and are poorly trained. Most do not have even a basic understanding of the Consumer Credit Act. They rarely do anything more once they have exhausted their collection of standard threatening letters will then start offering you “never to be repeated” discounted settlement figures in reducing amounts. Once you get one of these letters you can assume they have thrown in the towel.

 

It is very unlikely that Lowells will have any documentation to support the claim against you should follow the wise advice above and make them prove the claim.

 

In the very rare cases where they do start court action, or issue a statutory demand, they will back off immediately if a defence is filed.

 

In short there is no need to pay these sponging parasites a penny. If the account is not already statute barred, it soon will be, at which point any reference to it will drop off the credit reference agency files.

 

Last but not least, NEVER have any discussion with them by telephone. The zombie call centre staff are trained to lie and cajole you into entering a payment arrangement at which point the six year statute of limitation clock resets to zero. Any communication should be in writing and start with the sentence “I do admit any liability to your organisation”. Also you should print your name at the end of any letter instead of signing this as there have been instances where disreputable companies like Lowell have scanned signatures and used these to their advantage.

 

You will find hundreds, if not thousands, of useful posts on this site about Lowell where they are despised by the members and will receive all the help you need getting them out of your life.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

God bless you beautiful people...

 

I really do thank you guys. I've followed your advice and have just recieved this in response to my email... seems fairly generic which I can only deduct they get a lot of these!!!

 

We are currently looking into your enquiry and will respond to you as soon as possible. Please be assured we will try to answer and resolve your query at our earliest convenience.

 

Unfortunately I am unable to give you an exact date as to when this will be as our enquiries can take time, as we often have to retrieve information from the original client or external bodies.

 

What I can guarantee is that your enquiry is being dealt with and you have no need to e-mail again.

 

If you want to speak to someone in our Customer Service team then please do not hesitate to call on 0844 844 4722

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I can guarantee is that there is absolutely no need to pay these bottom-feeding parasites a single penny.

 

Remember Lowell Portfolio 1 have supplied you with nothing, and even if you did owe something to Vodafone they will have received a substantial credit from writing the balance off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi jimpeccable,

 

As this issues relates to an account you had with us around four years ago I'd like to take a look at this for you.

 

Could you send the Web Relations Team an email by following the instructions in our pinned thread? http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/telecoms-mobile-fixed/213340-vodafone-webteam-customers-problems.html

 

Many thanks and look forward to hearing from you.

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...