Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Morgan & My Monument card case


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5068 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

that is ok as a NOA but not a DOA which although referring to a bulk purchase would still (IMO) need to identify your particular account as having been assigned from one to the other

 

i am sure i read threads where DOA were shot down

 

try pm/ing angrycat- i think she might have some info to help you with a dodgy DOA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 373
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

sorry i did nt notice this was a NOA ooops then their is help with that from VJohn he has just blown HFO out of the water on that score i am sure vj has looked in on this sorry DD i know what you meant just that we go about things in a oppisite round about way LOL

as it is i always appreciate your help and always sound advice and i think fussy agrees as he has acted on your advice and cut out the geuswork as it serves no purpose....

the NOA should be simple to work out will come back later

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hiya all,

Latest Development

 

I Sar'd Barclaycard, who took over Monument card, just received their

reply.

 

Barclayreply.jpg

 

This WAS SENT s.d. and they received it 04/03/10. i sent it to London

office (Churchill place). Their 40 days are up 11th April.

 

Now it turns out that I had a Barclaycard account that I finished in 2007.

 

Surely they should have details about that account, (re; the money laundering act, requiring details to be held for so long after the account is closed.) or does the S.A.R request only apply to the A/C I quoted. ( Monument )?

 

puzzled. sir fuss.

 

I thought it was a request for ANY details held on me.

Edited by sir fussalot
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hiya All,

 

Case was yesterday, what a fiasco....:(

 

will post all details up later.. Hearing Adjourned.

 

Cabots only claiming ARREARS. as "Their Man", has looked at the dictionary definition of arrears and concludes..

 

" It means any money owing. ".

 

So their plan looks like, waiting for the debt/repayments to fall behind,

Then claim them to be arrears.

 

THUS, no D.N. required.

 

I argued the point with the D.J. that Arrears in context of the CCA

did not qualify as the legal arrears in the case.

 

D.J. did not want to know and accepted their argument for no D.N. needed

 

will post full details later... ( talk about Biased Judges. :evil: )

 

Sir Fuss

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya All,

 

Case was yesterday, what a fiasco....:(

 

will post all details up later.. Hearing Adjourned.

 

Cabots only claiming ARREARS. as "Their Man", has looked at the dictionary definition of arrears and concludes..

 

" It means any money owing. ".

 

So their plan looks like, waiting for the debt/repayments to fall behind,

Then claim them to be arrears.

 

THUS, no D.N. required.

 

I argued the point with the D.J. that Arrears in context of the CCA

did not qualify as the legal arrears in the case.

 

D.J. did not want to know and accepted their argument for no D.N. needed

 

will post full details later... ( talk about Biased Judges. :evil: )

 

Sir Fuss

 

 

Hi Sir Fuss,

 

What a load of bol.....ks

 

Actual meaning is :

 

That which is behind in payment, or which remains unpaid, though due; esp. a remainder, or balance which remains due when some part has been paid; arrearage; - commonly used in the plural, as, arrears of rent, wages, or taxes.

 

As usual a Cabot play on words to hoodwink the Judiciary into thinking they know best.

 

How did "your man" from Cabot know how much was due?

 

If he is saying that all is due then where is the proof - has he worked out how quickly in YEARS and MONTHS it would take to pay off the Arrears at the minimum monthly payment- if not then how can he prove that he is not demanding payments in advance? and therefore breaking the terms of the agreement himself.

 

So many holes in that - another thought - at some point Cabot would have demanded the full amount of due balance? that is where they then assume that the payments would stop and your debt discharged if you see what I mean.

 

Im sure somewhere you will have letter from them that will ask for the full balance and will make it very clear that it is not for the arrears.

 

Beau

Edited by BeauBrummie

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant wait to read what Morans have come up with this time, you say the case was adjurned hope theres still time to blow holes in there nonsence :eek:

 

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sir Fuss

Do you have the Raw Data that Morgans send out in responce to SAR and probably in there bundle of account? if so doesnt it say something along the lines of

 

'200, auto, 00/00/2006 00.00, Error during calculation days since default notice, date date of default notice is not known for this case, thus making calculation is invalid.

 

in there?? I know mine and a couple of others it does, worth a look :)

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sir Fuss

Do you have the Raw Data that Morgans send out in responce to SAR and probably in there bundle of account? if so doesnt it say something along the lines of

 

'200, auto, 00/00/2006 00.00, Error during calculation days since default notice, date date of default notice is not known for this case, thus making calculation is invalid.

 

in there?? I know mine and a couple of others it does, worth a look :)

 

Hadituptohere

 

My recent SAR revealed a similar incidence where the Default Date is not known - and then later on in the list all of a sudden there are calculations that start to appear.

 

I feel a nice letter coming on to Morgans asking them to calculate how the payments arrived at the full balance at the time of the issue of their claim.

 

Very valid point Hadituptohere

 

Beau

Edited by BeauBrummie
Extra info added

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sir Fuss

Do you have the Raw Data that Morgans send out in responce to SAR and probably in there bundle of account? if so doesnt it say something along the lines of

 

'200, auto, 00/00/2006 00.00, Error during calculation days since default notice, date date of default notice is not known for this case, thus making calculation is invalid.

 

 

Hadit,

 

practically word for word, I was going to challenge on, "How could you calculate interest etc, when the info' was not known"

 

This "phrase" date not known crops up regularly, but they still managed to put on "penalty interest".

 

will post up all the details later .Have to go to work now.

 

Beau, I think I must have had your D.J. he accepted several points after being told by Cabrots man what they meant, then replying, " Yes, I think

you are correct...:-o

 

Not very reassuring :oops:

 

fussey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not only the interest but default amounts are incorrect which are the arrears. If Cabots own computerised system cannot make the calculation how can anyone else????????

 

Another one down to the Judge Lottery

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant wait to read what Morans have come up with this time, you say the case was adjurned hope theres still time to blow holes in there nonsence :eek:

 

 

Hadituptohere

 

 

Your keeping us in suspence :-|

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Did anyone get any balance information within the SAR?

 

I have sheets of payments/merchandise interest/cash interest and their wonderful payment break plan but nothing showing what the balance was for the duration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya All, so Sorry I could not post any earlier. Mad three days at work.

didn't finish til late last night.

 

Went To Court Adjourned again.

Went in, different judge. went to sit by judge, my wife next to me.

 

No, Mrs Fusslot sits there, you sit there. he snapped.. (its my wifes case).

 

I stood up, and said sir, may I speak for my wife, she's still ill and.....

 

NO YOU MAY NOT, now sit down and keep quiet, That was a good start, my nerves completeley shot..

 

Mrs Fussalot was not well and wanted to "give up" and agree to anything

from Cabrot. I persuaded her to be there as she would not (and could not ) be able to say anything.

When he asked the first question to my wife, there was a horrible pause,

I then asked, as my wife was ill can I please answer for her.

 

The D.J. took off his glasses and sighed, Mr Fussalot. I do not like people trying to be lawyers, it does not help, and it does not do your wifes case any good to be represented by someone untrained.

 

However carry on.

 

Of course by this time I am "all over the place"

 

Well what do you think is the matter with the agreement? he asked.

 

I said, well it is not an properley executed agreement, and as such it

precludes the cou....... Thank you Mr. Fussalot, the D.J. hissed.

I don't want a speech just answer the question.

 

I said for the start, this is no more than an application form. An application form can be an agreement Mr. Fussalot. Helooked at the

 

opposition, and said I assume thats what you are saying.

 

Yes sir. he replied.

 

Why would this not be acceptable then Mr. Fusslot?

 

It was at this Point I couldn't believe what was happening, I just wanted to run.

 

I said it doesn't have the prescribed terms within the agreement.

 

What are the prescribed terms Mr. |Fussalot?

 

Well for one the number of repayments. Two there..... Just aminuet

 

He interrupted, lets have a look in the terms and conditions.

 

Thats another thing I said they are not the original terms and conditions.

 

Mr. fussalot, I will not tell you again, I only want you to answer the question, not to keep interupting.

 

But they are of no use, they are not the original t&c's.

 

Getting anoyed, he said how do you know they are not

 

Because. late penalty charges state £18. we have never had £18 for L.P's

 

from the third statement we have proof that the L.P's have allways been at £24.00 also fro the S.A.R. req from Barclaycard they list £24 from "day 1".

Mr. Fussalot. has it never occurred to you that the charges may have "gone up".

 

No sir, to do that they must give 30 days notice to vary the charges.

 

AND if you look in the "RAW DATA". entry for X/X/X. following my CCA request, it says T&c's used.

Sept '06, when the a/c was opened in 2002.

 

The D.J. then looked at Cabots man who said" It is not necessarrilly the T&c;s used from that date.

 

The D.J. made a note of this.

 

He cited the Manchester case as to the T&c's can be on seperate forms.

 

I then told him that, when I asked Cabot for a CCA request several years earlier, they had sent yet another different set of tc's.

 

Can you produce them the D.J. asked. not here. I said I didnt bring them

 

Mr. Fussalot why on earth did you not bring them to court?

 

I said that as I hadn't entered them as evidence before I didn't think they would be able to be used.

 

He threw his arms in the air.

 

So we need an adjournment for you to produce the original T&C's.

 

No I don't have the originals.

 

He flew into a rage you have just told me you have the originals. he shouted.

 

I was flabbergasted, I said no sir, I said Cabots supplied me...... Mr.Fussalot you have just told me you do have the originals yes or no?

 

I said Im sorry if I gave you the wrong.....Mr.Fussalot I will ask you once more. "Do you have CONFLICTING T&C's yes or no".

 

I said yes.

 

He threw his pen on the desk,. I said but they are from Cabots.

 

must go to work now, back soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, i'll continue.

 

I said I'm sorry but you have just asked me if I have conflicting T&C's, and I do from Cabot,

 

I am not interested in those he barked. They don't matter.

 

Now do you or do you not have the originals?

 

I said no. then he asked "Cabots man" to confirm whether or not they would be the original.

 

He said he would look into it for the next hearing.

 

Then the D.J. asked what else I didn't agree with.

 

I told him about the, "interest rate" not correct. he said it didn't matter as it was on the T&c's and that it could be varied.

 

I said the dates of repayments, frequency, timing etc.

He just looked thro' the terms & c's to each point and said "they are all answered here."

 

He said, " so thats the agreement decided. I will not go back to this at the next hearing, this is finished, do you understand?".

So I had to agree.

 

Then he asked if that was it. I said no sir. well what else do you think is wrong.

 

I said the Notice of Assignment, I haven't recieved one.

 

So he asked Cabot how do you send a Notice of Assignment out.

 

He told him that it would be "computer generated" when they took over the account.

 

The D.J. asked if anyone needed to "press a button" to send it.Cabot said NO, it was automatic.

 

Yes then I will accept that it would have been sent then......:eek:

 

So I asked about the Deed of Assignment the one that was "redacted"

 

or in other words completely blanked out. Showing no proof whatsoever that it had a connection with my a/c.

 

Suprise Suprise the D.J. agreed with ME.....it was completely useless

and had been redacted a "little over keenly"

 

So as the case was going to be adjourned could Cabots supply one next time that had alittle more information on it.

 

Right is that it now Mr. Fussalot.

 

No sir.

 

He then actually groaned.

 

I asked about the Default notice. the D.J. looked at Cabot.

 

Cabot said, well sir for the reasons already given no D.N notice was required to be sent by either, Cabot or Monument

 

I asked, Can I ask Mr Cabot a question, was a D.N notice sent.

 

He replied he couldn't answer for Monument as he didn't know, BUT as they were claiming only the arrears, it wasn't necessary anyway.

 

I then asked how do you get the ARREARS to be the same as the capital

sum total. THANK you Mr. Fussalot. The D.J. iterrupted, I am conducting this court not you....

 

He looked at Cabot and said "well". ( I thought, this'll be good )

 

Cabot replied that" the dictionary definition for arrears was, any money owed or not paid, that should have been".

 

Guess what the D.J. said............

 

Correct.. very well, O.K.

 

That was it. I said So,as Monument did not send a D.N. notice the account had been unlawfully terminated

 

And unlawfull rescission means I can claim damages.

 

Thank you Mr. Fussalot be quiet.

 

Then he looked at Cabot, is this correct has the account been terminated

I could sense the dissapointment in his question.

 

This time Cabot got flustered, rummaging thro his papers he said he was not aware that the account had been terminated.

 

The D.J. said how do you know it has been terminated.

 

I said the letter from Monument saying " the arrears of £150, has not been paid, this account has now been closed." :lol:

 

s.f.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had told the D.J that the previous court order had told Cabots that the

 

original agreement had to be produced at the hearing. along with the D.N.

 

and the Notice of Assignment

 

He just said that was the other hearing, and Not his.

 

He made reference to the Manchester case, and Rankines.

 

The other judge told me to send in a Skeleton argument with the points of law I was questioning or relying on. But, not to quote case after case and have a long list of rulings.

 

This one complained that I had no defence, and the case (for the defence) SHOULD HAVE BEEN THROWN OUT.

 

i HAVE BEEN TO (a few ) courts, but this one was the worst.

thank goodness they are not all like the D.J. I had.

 

I really trhink he had made his mind up that we had lost. until the last point.

 

But if we have lost. (next hearing to be announced) they can only claim £150. arrears.

 

would they still be able to claim their costs on top of that.?

 

currently running at £2,500.00p

 

s.f.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I really trhink he had made his mind up that we had lost. until the last point.

 

Yes, Sirfuss - I got the the same feeling after no more than about 10 mIns of my hearing

But if we have lost. (next hearing to be announced) they can only claim £150. arrears.

 

Is it your view that the DJ accepted that there was no DN and the account was terminated unlawfully?

 

would they still be able to claim their costs on top of that.?

 

currently running at £2,500.00p

 

It may be worth investigating - not sure, but I can tell you that I have asked to be allowed to counterclaim against the original claim, should I win on appeal. Obviously my costs would counter their costs so to speak.

 

s.f.

 

Keep your chin up and keep digging - vjjohn has alot of info on the way that these accounts were assigned from Barclaycard - ref s36 of the Companies act.

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sir fus and beau

 

well done for getting throught that ordeal sir fus, lets hope that they can only claim the arrears 150.00, cant see them getting costs when their poc claim the full balance? someone will correct me if im wrong.

 

Beau any chance of a link to Vjohns info, thanks

 

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another angle to counter Cabot charge that no DN is required. I assume you do have the original Providian T&C's as provided by Cabot!!

 

Look at Page 6 S16 (i) "Early Repayment"

 

Think that sums up the required action for termination!!

 

Hadituptohere,

 

This scenario is where the DOA was only signed by one person contrary to S36 Companies Act 2006, so it depends on the dates of assigment.

 

I think Vjohn would accept a PM request for the relevant info if its relevant to this case.

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sir fuss, beau

 

Do you both have the NOA from barclays to cabot? I have mine and its about 30 pages mainly made up of blanked/marker out pages? Just looking at mine page 26, schedule 5, Eligible accounts:

 

7 'Eligible accounts are accounts which have been originated, maintained and serviced in all material respects in compliance with all Applicable Licences, consents, approval, authorisations, registrations or declarations required to be obtained, effected or given by the vendor or any agents acting on its behalf including in particular but without limitation, the Cosumer Credit Act 1974, the data Protection Act 1998, and the Administration of justice Act 1970.'

 

Then

 

9. which are not Uncollectable Accounts

 

Of course uncollectable accounts has been blacked out totally

 

Then theres this which I think are foolishgirls words:

 

The point is that if the account has been absolutely assigned, the agreement has been terminated. Your agreement is not with Cabot or any other DCA that wants to claim it, it's with the OC & the OC cannot assign it (with all the rights & duties etc!!) unless it has been terminated. Now they have a choice, either

(a) the account is in default & they send a DN under S87 & then terminate or

(b) the account is not in default but they just feel like terminating anyway in which case they have to give you notice

 

The arrears argument only comes into play when they've issued a DN (i.e.arrears at date of DN) or when it's been terminated & if it's been terminated, it has to done as above.

 

 

Maybe something there

 

Hadituptohere

  • Haha 1

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9. which are not Uncollectable Accounts

 

Of course uncollectable accounts has been blacked out totally

 

I too have an account sale agreement between Barclaycard and HFO Capital where the uncollectable account portion has been totally blanked out.

 

I'm going to be looking applying for a court order to get this portion released.

 

 

Then theres this which I think are foolishgirls words:

 

The point is that if the account has been absolutely assigned, the agreement has been terminated. (This is correct) Your agreement is not with Cabot or any other DCA that wants to claim it, it's with the OC & the OC cannot assign it (with all the rights & duties etc!!) unless it has been terminated. Now they have a choice, either

(a) the account is in default & they send a DN under S87 & then terminate or

(b) the account is not in default but they just feel like terminating anyway in which case they have to give you notice

 

The arrears argument only comes into play when they've issued a DN (i.e.arrears at date of DN) or when it's been terminated & if it's been terminated, it has to done as above.

 

 

Maybe something there

 

Hadituptohere

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...