Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can somebody help a newbie please? BCW "debt"


86.dll
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5294 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody, I hope that somebody can help me with my problem.

 

Yesterday I received a letter from Buchanan Clark & Wells saying that they were instructed by Npower to recover an overdue debt of about £280.

 

Now, on the letter it's written that the supply period was from 01/12/2006 to 04/08/2009.

First of all, I wasn't in that flat anymore from 16/06/2007, when I moved out to another flat. Where are they coming from telling me that I haven't paid the gas for more than 2 years after I moved out?

The starting date instead is right (01/12/2006), as I moved in the flat on that day, but according to them I never ever paid for the gas in 6 months that I've been there. How could that have been possible if it was true? Don't they cut the gas supply if you are not paying for it? Plus, they would have started contacting me since the beginning if I wasn't paying my bills from day 1.

 

I can prove that I moved out of the flat on 16/06/2007 as I still have the contract for the new flat, but I no longer have any proof that the bills were always paid at the time.

 

I made some research on Google and I read terrible things about this BCW company, loads of people contacted and harassed to pay debts of years ago that they never had.

 

Now, I'm very inexperienced with all this legal stuff as I am quite young and I never had to deal with these kind of problems before. I feel quite vulnerable as, since I don't know my rights, I feel like they can turn me how they want me and make it look like I'm at fault. I'd like to know what's the best thing to do now or what I should do to counter at them and let them know that I don't have any intentions to pay any "debt" for old bills that were always paid for.

 

Thanks to everybody in advance for your help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Huff&Puff, I guess the template that I'm supposed to use is the General debt letter - if you know nothing of the debt..., right? Do you think I should just send a letter without modifying the template (well, obviously putting my data) or should I make clear that 1) I moved out on 16/06/2007 and 2) I always paid all the bills that I received during my tenancy? Or there is no point in that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so in that case I guess I can just send the template as it is with just this little modification:

"I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to Npower, and I demand proof of it."

 

Is that good enough?

Sorry, I don't want to be baby-sitted, I just wanna make sure I do things right! Thanks a lot! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That'll be fine. It really isn't important whether you use a template or just write a one sentence letter saying "prove it" really, the chances are they will ignore it anyway, there is considerable doubt as to whether the employees of DCAs can actually read. But at least, once the letter has been sent you will be able to formlly put it into dispute.

 

I forgot to say, send it recorded delivery, and don't sign it. It is alleged that certain DCAs can be creative with Photoshop :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't use Faxes neither, so I don't know if there is any proof of receiving it, I guess I can find out...

I read around that the best thing is to call them and send the fax "live" while on the phone.. but thinking about it, unless I'm recording the conversation in which they are saying that they received the fax, they could later deny everything as well I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a cardinal rule to never, ever, ever phone them :eek:

 

That is what they really want more than anything, they are expert at bullying people over the phone. In fact, on reflection, it would be better not to fax, because if they get hold of your phone number, you'll soon find out what harassment means :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so I'll reply with a fax from some public place, just sending them the "prove it" letter with no further details about the fact that I wasn't in the flat for most of the period they want me to pay for. If anybody has some additional hint to give me, they are very appreciated.

Thank you guys for the help.

I'll keep updated. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Help guys, BCW is back with a FINAL NOTICE, and they are acting like I never made any attempt to contact them back after they sent me the first letter, while instead I sent them the "prove it" letter via fax. (I was unable to find a fax service that gives you back that printed page that says at what time and date the fax was received, so essentially I cannot prove that they got my reply)

 

They say

"Since you failed to notify us of any legitimate reason for non-payment we can only assume that you do not wish to settle this matter amicably.

 

Accordingly, this letter should be accepted as FINAL NOTICE that unless payment is made immediately, we shall seek to commence LEGAL PROCEEDINGS against you, with payment of INTERESTS AND COSTS in addition to the Principal Sum being sought."

 

Now, in what the Legal Proceedings consist of? Can it happen that one day I come back home and I find, say, the computer missing because they came in to take stuff to repay the debt? Or what else can happen, what can they do?

 

Also, am I gonna end up with a sum much much bigger than what they want me to pay now (£280) just because I'm refusing to pay what I'm not supposed to pay in first place? What if in the end I'm forced to pay at all costs but the sum as gone up by hundreds of pounds?

 

What should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll send it with recorded delivery tomorrow morning... but can they go as far as ignoring that too? Will they pause or stop this Legal Proceeding crap? Will the Interests and Costs start going up anyway?

 

Also, should I attach another page to the "prove it" letter that says that I indeed replied to them but they are failing to recognise it? Or there's no point in that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter whether they ignore it or not because you'll have proof of postage & be able to check that it has been signed for. Until they prove you owe a debt and they have the right to collect they cannot use any legal enforcement, if they tried you could easily get it set aside.

 

As for the charges they are adding on.... they are not entitled to do it, so they can swivel. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They CANNOT charge any Interests and Costs at all??? Why not? (sorry, It's not that I don't trust your help, it's just that I wanna understand...)

Do they just lie on documents like that then?

 

And it is still unclear to me... in what the Legal Enforcement eventually consists of?

 

(PS: What does it mean that "they can swivel"? sorry, English is not my first language, so I don't know this expression yet.. I tried googling it but I found other definitions..)

Edited by 86.dll
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do they just lie on documents like that then?

 

Do they lie? They never stop lying :mad: What you will soon discover, is that nobody will enforce any of the laws or guidelines appertaining to DCAs, therefore they carry on exactly as they please. Never trust what any DCA says or writes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this scares me even more..

If they can do whatever they want, what stops them from charging me with these Interests and Costs (on top of this imaginary "debt") even if they are not entitled to, like cerberusalert was telling me?

What stops them from breaking into my house?

Can they really do whatever they want to this degree?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no need to be scared, they cannot do what they want even though they would like to and sometimes infer they can.

 

They cannot add charges or interest unless an agreement specifically includes it within the terms of the contract.

 

They cannot break into your house either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...