Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CABOT / BARCALYCARD CCA Request


lc1983
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am new to this, so any help would be greatly appreciated.

I received a letter from Cabot about 3 years ago, stating I owed money on a Barclaycard account.

I sent off a CCA request a couple days later. Finally yesterday they posted what they say is the CCA. But looks more like a Application form! is this the same thing?

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without seeing it printed up on here (excluding any personal details) then its hard to judge, but knowing the likes of Cabot, chances are it wont be the real thing.

Does it have your signature on?

Also, do you know when the last activity on this account was?

Was it over 6 years ago by any chance? :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks!how do I post post the pic?I have scanned it but do not know how to upload it on to a post!

The form they have sent does have my signature on!

Not sure with regards to the six years, how would I find this out?

 

Thanks again!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 7 is covered up and too small to read.

 

On that form, must be ethe prescribed terms. Without them it can only be enforced by a court. These are:

 

1. Credit limit or how it will be determined.

 

2. APR, the interst rate.

 

3. Repayment schedule, how much you pay each month and when.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So would you say that this is just the application form?and would this be unenforceable?what should I respond with!? Thanks

Well, an application form can be turned into an agreement under certain circumstances.

 

Has the document got the prescribed terms in it, as previously mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know!I thought it was all done with then received the above the other day!I don't know when the last payment was made!what would be my response to the above?they have asked me to phone to discuss !! Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres a whole host of things you can do with this. Forgive me for being presumptious but I'm assuming you're new to this and unfamiliar with your rights as a consumer? I'd sit tight for now and let them chase you, don't enter into any phone conversations with them under any circumstance, do not send them anything with your signature on and be wary of their attempts to obtain it with various letters written to be in your favour that will get them your signature. I know they have it anyway but don't give them anything.

 

Use this time to read the forums here, learn about the prescribed terms and read the many examples posted. That's what the majority of us have done combined with personal interests in legal issues. I'd suggest reading the OFT literature available online too. This will tell you about the expected 'form and content' agreements have to abide by. Find the CCA Regulations for good advice. This will show you what you need to know.

 

An example is that many 'agreements' are not correctly termed according to the type of credit they offer. Most are dubbed Credit Agreements when a runnning credit account such as a credit card should really be entitled as a 'Credit Card Agreement'. Many times the terminology of an 'agreement' is incorrect such as using differing words to show the amount of credit you have. Should be 'Credit Limit' instead of 'Credit Value' or 'Credit Amount' for example.

 

These are all little things compared to the bigger points but are still valid. Rights of cancellation is another, often the creditor gets this wrong which is a breach of the consumer credit act. In essence there is a lot to read and learn but take your time, send questions where appropriate and above all don't panic.

 

Finally this forum does not advocate escaping debts and being irresponsible, it is here to enrich the knowledge of those to ensure they are treated in the manner the law has made provision for. As we know quite often the banks and particularly the DCA's behave in unscrupulous ways so learning where you stand is no bad thing. All the best :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the typical response to a Sharklycard CCA request.

 

The required document has not been retained by the original creditor. All that remains is this illegible microfiche copy. The fact that it is completely illegible renders it unenforceable, and it is almost certain that even if it had been legible, it would not have contained the prescribed terms.

 

It is Sharklycard's responsibility to retain the relevant paperwork. Due to laziness and a desire to cut costs to the bone, they have blatantly failed to do so. There are thousands of cases similar to this one. It is Crapbot's responsibility to ensure that any alleged debts they purchase come with the relevant paperwork. Due to the fact that they can bully so many people into donating money without paperwork, this is rarely a concern to them. On this occasion, it will be.

 

Needless to say, do not waste time with them on the telephone. They will use any such contact as an excuse to attempt to bully you, and you can gain absolutely nothing from it.

 

There is a letter template which specifically deals with this situation. I had it on my old PC, but that died before I could get everything off onto a flash drive. I am now trying to build up my collection again.

 

I will try a search, but if anyone else knows where the letter can be found, could they please post it here? 42man and cerberusalert are brilliant with letters.

 

SH

Link to post
Share on other sites

For illegible documents I tend to use the following, pinched from this site somewhere :-

 

Dear ****/Rat/nasty person,

 

Thank you for your letter dated XXXXXX and the attached documents in response to my Statutory Requests for a true copy of the properly executed Regulated Consumer Credit Card Agreement in relation to my alleged Account. Unfortunately your response has not produced any evidence that the alleged Agreement is enforceable.

The alleged Agreement appear to be unenforceable for the following reasons:

 

1. The document is an Application Form and must carry the correct title if it is to be considered suitable as becoming an Agreement once properly executed. The missing Title being 'Credit Card Agreement Regulated by The Consumer Credit Act 1974.'

 

2. I am entitled to receive a true copy of the Agreement and such true copy must be easily legible. What you have sent is not a true copy, nor easily legible. It is hard to read due to poor quality copying of a copy.

This is contrary to the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1557)

 

2 Legibility of notices and copy documents and wording of prescribed Forms

 

(1) The lettering in every notice in a Form prescribed by these Regulations and in every copy of an executed agreement, security instrument or other document referred to in the Act and delivered or sent to a debtor, hirer or surety under any provision of the Act shall, apart from any signature, be easily legible and of a colour which is readily

distinguishable from the .

(2) The wording of any Form prescribed by these Regulations shall be reproduced in copies of unexecuted or executed

agreements or in Notices of Cancellation Rights sent [by an appropriate method] under section 64(1)(b) or (2) of the Act

without any alteration or addition, except that--

(a) the creditor or owner may enter the name and address of the debtor or hirer in any Cancellation Form prescribed

by these Regulations; and

(b) every Form shall be completed in accordance with any footnote.

(3) Any such footnote shall not be treated as part of any Form prescribed by these Regulations and may be reproduced

in addition to any such Form.

(4) Where any such footnote requires any words to be omitted, those words shall be omitted or deleted.

 

3. The Agreement must contain the prescribed terms within the four corners of the Agreement, the alleged Agreement does not have the prescribed terms within the four corners and furthermore no where on the front is there any reference to terms and conditions being on the reverse.

 

You should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit including but not limited to Trading Standards, the Office of Fair Trading, the Information Commissioners Office, The Financial Ombudsman Service and my MP .

 

 

If you have the original of my alleged Agreement available I request that I be allowed to view it at your offices so I can verify it as the alleged document that I signed.

 

I must also remind you that any court action you may choose to take would require you to produce the original of the alleged Agreement.

 

I look forward to hearing from you within the next 7 days.

 

Until such time as you comply with my Statutory Requests, this alleged Account remain in dispute.

 

Yours sincerely

S.
Link to post
Share on other sites

That letter courtesy of The Shadow is not one I had in my files anyway, so I suspect it is of very recent vintage.

 

It will suit the needs of this case perfectly.

 

It is a disadvantage that you do not know when the last payment or written acknowledgment of the alleged debt occurred. Without this information, you will not know on which date the alleged account becomes statute barred.

 

You can send a subject access request to the original creditor to find this out, but there will be a £10 charge for doing so. The SAR could also show you whether a compliant default notice was ever issued prior to termination.

 

There is always a slight risk that this SAR could bring up a compliant agreement, but with Sharklycard it is extremely unlikely.

 

In the end, it is your call. A lot depends on your overall situation which only you know, and it also depends on whether or not you have any rough idea when the last payment might have been.

 

SH

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did phone me with regards to this about a month ago, asking for payment!I said I had no knowledge of this debt and was still waiting a reply from my cca request!the guy who I spoke to said my last payment was 2003, but forget the exact date! Thanks for all your replies!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...