Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

shoesue25 v Reliable


shoesue25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

i need some help i had a catalogue in my middle name not my first , i got behind with the payments recently now reliable collections have called me and said it was fraud is it ? i made regular payments using my bank card i paid online they kept repeating that it is fraud and the police would come to my home and arrest me put me in handcuffs and take me to the police sation it scared the hell out of me at the time but ?i didnt try to hde my identity as i was using my bank account .

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are talking utter rubbish, send them a CCA request to see if they are entitled to collect this debt & if it's enforcable. If they fail to provide it within 12+2 days or the CCA is unenforcable you can legally withold any payment until they do. Send it recorded delivery enclosing a £1 postal order. When you get a reply, scan it & remove any identifying details and post it back here where we can have a look at it. We'll advise you from there;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account No: XXXXXXXX/Your Reference Number: XXXXXXX

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

You should also note that I will only discuss this matter in writing and should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you or any of your associates.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance. (Optional addition)

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully **Edit to suit**

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't suppose you recorded this "conversation" by any chance, did you?

 

It would make fascinating listening if you did.

 

SH

no i didnt record it as as it was totaly unexpected ,and they quoted the police stuff 4 times in this 4 min conversation but i still want to know if i broke the law using my middle name ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i didnt record it as as it was totaly unexpected ,and they quoted the police stuff 4 times in this 4 min conversation but i still want to know if i broke the law using my middle name ?

 

Absolutely and emphatically not. You were not trying to deceive anyone by claiming to be someone you weren't.

 

SH

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not an offence to use your middle name, deception along with fraud is a crimminal offence but you haven't defrauded anyone and you haven't deceived anyone, you made payment from your recognised card, where is the offence? You may no longer be making payments but that is a civil matter not a crimminal one.

 

First thing to do is quit talking to them on the phone, change your number or just disconnect the call as soon as you hear their voice and altogether disregard their ridiculous claims.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks for putting my mind at rest ,i have just recieved a letter you wont believe the cheek of them they have said it is from the fraud/police liason dept it asks me to sign and return the letter then they will discuss payment and they have put my account number and the account number of someone else if i sign this letter i would be confirming i am responsible for these debts ,even without reading you messages i could see this wasnt a legal letter i could have done better myself some jumped up little twerp is rubbing his hands together thinking he has solved some of his case load well he's in for a shock .now i'm not thick but was is this cc whotsit your talking about and how do i go about it ?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks for putting my mind at rest ,i have just recieved a letter you wont believe the cheek of them they have said it is from the fraud/police liason dept it asks me to sign and return the letter then they will discuss payment and they have put my account number and the account number of someone else if i sign this letter i would be confirming i am responsible for these debts ,even without reading you messages i could see this wasnt a legal letter i could have done better myself some jumped up little twerp is rubbing his hands together thinking he has solved some of his case load well he's in for a shock .now i'm not thick but was is this cc whotsit your talking about and how do i go about it ?:confused:

Send the CCA request

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks for putting my mind at rest ,i have just recieved a letter you wont believe the cheek of them they have said it is from the fraud/police liason dept it asks me to sign and return the letter then they will discuss payment and they have put my account number and the account number of someone else if i sign this letter i would be confirming i am responsible for these debts ,even without reading you messages i could see this wasnt a legal letter i could have done better myself some jumped up little twerp is rubbing his hands together thinking he has solved some of his case load well he's in for a shock .now i'm not thick but was is this cc whotsit your talking about and how do i go about it ?:confused:

 

Whatever you do, keep hold of that letter. The telephone calls may not be evidence if you didn't record them but that letter certainly is.

 

Find out about the CCA request here -

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

 

SH

Link to post
Share on other sites

What Is A Cca And How Do I Go About It Please??????????

A CCA is a consumer credit agreement.

 

Send this letter to your creditor. They have 14 working days to comply or the account goes into dispute.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

With reference to the alleged debt to your company, this letter is a formal request of true copy of a signed and dated credit agreement for the above account number, under the terms and conditions of section 78(1) of the CCA act 1974. I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £1.00

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit.

I enclose a postal order no xxxxxxxxxxxxx in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI everyone out there well next instalment comming up ,when i got the letter from reliable yesterday asking me to sign and send back there was a second a/c number on it we have found out this was a friends a/c with fasion world i had ordered items from and as they were deivered to my address and she has now left the country owing them money they have decided for whatever reason i am her yes thats right i am now another person at a different address and they want me to pay her bill on the strength of goods that were deivered to me ,i am now wondering if they live in the same world as us ,how do they come up with these assumptions ,i knew she was leaving but didnt know of her financial situationwhy why would i .so what do i do about this little gem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

i wont sign anything i promise you they must assume everyone is very gullible i'm sure they will be very dissapointed when they don't recieve it back:confused: i have sent of the cca at this moment in time i am fumming that they are trying to get me to pay back someone else's account they rang again this morning i didnt answer the phone and i wont in future .well i am so glad i found this web site even if it was by accident you all know so much about the legal stuff i had no idea about all this. you lot are a mine field of information thank you again i'll keep you updated on the progress

of this saga:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...