Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi If you have went via a Mutual Exchange and this is to do with Social Housing/Housing Association then both parties need to firstly be approved by each parties Housing Association and accepted by them. Once this is done the relevant Housing Association for each will then get each party to sign a New Tenancy Agreement with the relevant Housing Association. So what we really need to know is: Does the other party to this Mutual Exchange know you have changed your mind on exchanging properties? Have they just signed an Agreement in principle to exchange properties? or Have they actually signed a New Tenancy Agreement for that Property? If they have signed a New Tenancy Agreement then this will make not now wanting to continue the mutual exchange difficult due to the New Tenancy Agreement being Signed. We really need to know what stage this is at to give correct advice
    • From unhackable communication networks to powerful computers, quantum technology promises huge advances.View the full article
    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gym debt , ARC now scotcall threatening me with a 'visit'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4770 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

well heres my response that included an attached invoice for £25 for admin charges that i sent to scotcall.

 

Dear sir/madam

 

i write to you with regards to your letter dated 24th October 2009. I

inform you that this account that has been passed on to you is still in

dispute with Direct legal collections (DLC), and therefore passing it on

to yourselves is a breach of OFT guidelines as the dispute is not

resolved. Therefore if you yourselves continue to pursue this debt that

i do not acknowledge owing to your company or that of DLC and the

original creditor, then you will be in breach of the Data Protection Act

and Information act along with DLC for processing my data without my

consent. You are therefore to stop processing my data effective

immediately.

 

Now with regards to the content of your letter. "failure to reply or

contact us within 7 days of the date of this letter will result in your

account being passed onto our Field Representatives to Arrange a

Doorstep Call".

 

Well that's not going to happen! Because i can tell you now, i will

never agree to have such field representatives come to my home. Should

it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised

that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an

appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to

be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the

postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and

Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note

that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives

to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to

damages for a tort of trespass and any necessary action will be taken.

 

So to summarize, you can not lawfully pursue me for this debt whilst it

is still in dispute with DLC, to do so would be a breach of the Data

Protection Act and Information Act as you do not have my permission to

process my data and such data should never have been given to you in the first place, as the account is in dispute with DLC. Secondly, sending

any of your so called field agents (bailiffs) round would be a breach of

OFT guidelines as well as an unlawful act on your part, and legal action

will be taken against you in response to such action.

 

Oh, and DLC failed to comply with my request for a true copy of

original agreement. Since it has now been over 30 days then they are in default of the so called debt. So another reason why it should

never have been passed onto you. if you wish to continue pursuing the

debt then you will be acting unlawfully and will be reported along with

DLC to the OFT, Trading standards, information commissioner and

financial ombudsman In which you may be subject to a large fine as a

result and not to mention the possibility of having your credit license

taken away from you.

 

Also you are not to contact myself by phone, to do so would be deemed

as harassment.

 

Also please note that an Invoice to cover my administration cost and

time lost as a result of dealing with your letter has been attached to

this letter along with your payment options. Failure to pay within 14

days will result in further charges being added for each payment

reminder sent to you. If you continue to fail to pay then debt

collection proceedings may be issued against you. Alternatively you may

pay through PayPal by sending payment to (email address removed)

and put in the notes section your invoice number and mark for my

attention.

 

Also with regards to the postal strikes currently occurring in the UK,

can you please respond by email to prevent any loss of your written

response or payment details in the mail. thank you.

 

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

And here is there response recieved within 2-3 hours from my email to them.

 

Good Afternoon

 

Thanks for attached, The account will be closed noting your dispute and

returned to our client, who will be in touch with you direct. We have no

further information on this account.

 

S White

 

 

ScotCall

3rd Floor

Spectrum House

55 Blythswood Street

Glasgow

G2 7AT

 

 

www.scotcall.co.uk

 

This Email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

intended

solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are

addressed.

 

This Communication may contain material protected by law, copyright or

other legislation.

 

If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for

delivering

the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received

this

email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing

or

copying of this email is strictly prohibited.

 

If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager

by

telephone on +44 (0) 141 243 4831.

 

 

So far not heard anything from anyone else about this so called debt. but i intend to follow up on the invoice i sent them if they dont pay me on time, lets see how they bloody like being chased and sent threatograms for debts lol.

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You should sell the debt to Lewis/Howard Cohen who will probably issue a claim form before the ink is dry! A DCA chasing a DCA - that would be fun.

 

Unfortunately, I think you'd be obliged to warn them BEFORE trying to make charges for letters, etc. Because that's the law - the law which every DCA sticks to rigidly, as we all, er, know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well when they start to warn me before sending me letters demanding money including their charges, then ill start to warn them about charges for letters i have to send back lol

 

oh and good choice on the DCA you recommended i hear they can be alot of fun to deal with lol

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays finance partnership,they do car loans.Funny thing is I thought it was a car loan so I phoned them and said sorry I'm financially in the poo so can you take the car back and they said no because it wasn't a car loan just a loan to buy a car,through hippo finance,so I sold it bought a cheaper car and paid for the bankruptcy with the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
"Well I have been chased by DCAs since March, paid nothing to them and certainly won't be giving in now!"

 

How very responsible of you. Will you be teaching your children not to pay their debts and taxes as well?

 

What difference does it make what powers these DCA's have. The fact remains that you have all admitted to canceling your memberships and are refusing to pay the money you owe. Yet you all slag off bailiffs and DCA's like they are the crooks yet here you all are gloating over the fact that your simply not going to pay what you owe.

 

I think this site has lost its purpose.

 

 

Some of us genuinely did cancel our membership, and in my case I paid two months more than I was supposed to as I was officially coming to the end of the first 12 months and should only have had to pay for one month. David Lloyd refused to accept that they had received my letter even though I handed it in myself by hand and with a witness present. I have been hounded for two years and I am glad that the people on this forum have given me the confidence to stand my ground. We're not irresponsible, just refusing to be bullied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good old Scotcall, they were the only one's that turned up on the hippy's door un-announced. Kevin was his name, told him no uncertain terms will talk till the cow's come home on all subjects including the meaning of life, but as for my personal debts... do one.

 

Guess what, Muppetcroft on the scene now,,, hiking charges on a an 02 bill etc etc,,,, wrote to O2 complained but them muppets just said deal with muppetcroft.. but at least they gave me a figure of what was owing,,,, hmmmm a lot different from muppetcrofts figure, repeat the same old same old,,,,, £1.00 token payment and that is all I can afford, good enough for Yorkshire bank on £13,000 good enough for them. Set up standing order and the cheeky gits write and say thank you hippy for your £1.00 but you have not agreed a plan with us...heeeeee,,, what plan say's I, take it or leave it, or see you in court.... Await there next instalment. hmmm. Had a problem with Brookes and Bentley over a £45.00 left owing on some jewellery, cheeky sods charged me £20.00 late payment fee,,, guess what, hippy paid the £45.00 and told them to whistle for the late charge, where do they get these figures from. All paid off and not heard a dicky from CCS collect... Did not even have the decency to acknowledge my letter. Bit I digress, if every Neanderthal of a DCA turned up who said they would, I would bring the estate to a halt with congestion.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...