Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would only rely on your solicitor in this regard. The other two should not have a view.   And, you are responsible for how the court perceive you. They only have your words and deeds to go on. Expecting them to magically see things your way is not a great tactic.
    • Yes, I don't think there is any downside to doing this. If they decline then you can say that in your witness statement
    • Ok! Do you still want me to work on that letter you discussed above in post #26?
    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
    • opps this is going to get messy then if they don't refund. you should never keep util accounts in credit.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bryan Carter has issued summons


Gary29
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5089 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just received court summons from Bryan Carter through the Northampton County Court for an outstanding debt on an Egg Card. We are currently on a Debt Management Plan with Payplan and have been making regular payments against this debt and continue to do so.

 

Can anyone offer advice on filing a defence?

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should point out that according to PayPlan our payments are being paid to Egg via Direct Legal and Collections. Bryan Carter are acting on behalf of Fredrickson Int who claimed the debt was sent to them to collect. As I haven't received any notification from Egg that the debt has been assigned to Fredrickson and neither has Payplan we have continued paying Egg through DLC.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Northampton is the DCA's head threat centre.

Its worth pointing out that Carter are notorious for sending out documents that look like they've come from a court, when nothing could be furthur from reality.

If its from a proper court, then it will give you various sections of advice/what to do/were to get in touch with etc...

No court would just demand the full amount off you just like that.

Thats not how the legal system works & maybe Carter should realize that :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should also point out that the POC lists the claimant as Egg Banking PLC, but I can prove that EGG has been receiving regular payments through PayPlan at an amount agreed between themselves and Payplan.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Northampton is the DCA's head threat centre.

Its worth pointing out that Carter are notorious for sending out documents that look like they've come from a court, when nothing could be furthur from reality.

If its from a proper court, then it will give you various sections of advice/what to do/were to get in touch with etc...

No court would just demand the full amount off you just like that.

Thats not how the legal system works & maybe Carter should realize that :cool:

 

The summons does indeed come with all the other documents, I also tried phoning the helpline and it is Northampton CC.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in that case, it will (or should have) a section requiring you to fill in all i & e details....

If so, then include bills,clothes,food,travel costs etc...all classed as legal essentials.

Ive never known a court to require receipts for the amount of food you buy - or for any of them in my experience.

Therefore, im sure you can do the maths beforehand & easily just have a £1 leftover?

In the eyes of the law, you are deemed to be paying something ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in that case, it will (or should have) a section requiring you to fill in all i & e details....

If so, then include bills,clothes,food,travel costs etc...all classed as legal essentials.

Ive never known a court to require receipts for the amount of food you buy - or for any of them in my experience.

Therefore, im sure you can do the maths beforehand & easily just have a £1 leftover?

In the eyes of the law, you are deemed to be paying something ;)

 

Oh but I have been paying them, Egg have been receiving monthly payments through PayPlan for several years.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you requested the CCA for this debt ?

 

Yes I did and I received a copy of the agreement with my signature on, which is what I requested when they first started threatening legal action. I haven't got a copy of payments received against the account though.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This just sounds like a case of Carter chancing his arm via Northampton etc...

If you are already re-paying an amount then it is crazy to have to repay someone else at the same time.

Carter & Northampton need to be made aware of this situation ASAP and if they dont want to know, then i would seek your own legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We sent Bryan Carter a letter back in May, a copy of which is shown below. My apologies but it is a bit long;

 

Bryan Carter& Co Solicitors

14thMay 2009

 

reference: *********

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

This is in acknowledgement of your letter dated 12th May 2009, The contents of which have been duly noted.

Further to you stressing that County Court proceedings will be actioned by yourselves should I fail to make contact/stressing that proccedings are about to be commenced in regard to alleged sums outstanding and alleged owed by me on the above account,I remind you of Civil procedure rules protocols.

Nevertheless in my response to your letter please be advised of the following.

 

I put forward that you now have a requirement to provide me with;

 

1) A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened. Please note that a "true copy" as defined by the Consumer Credit Act will not be acceptable in this case, and a copy of the actual executed agreement, including signature, is required.

 

2) All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to

 

1. A transcript of all transactions, including charges, fees, interest, payments and both the amounts of credit and any repayments made to the account.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations

3. Where there has been any event in the account history over this period that has required manual intervention by any person, disclosure of any indication or notes that have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to the account held by me with Egg is required.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you sent to me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998.

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

I make this request to ensure that each party has equal footings which can allow action to proceed speedily fairly and without undue costs or waste of courts time,as defined within Pre-action Practice Directions -Protocols 4.6 of the Civil Procedures Rules.

I will give you 14 days to respond with the above,failure to comply will result in a complaint being made to the Court./In addition to the FOS for any breaches of OFT and CCA codes.This includes breaches as a result of initiating a Country Court claim where failing to provide or produce documents make litigation improper..

Specifically this relates to one or any number of the following;

 

* demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* add any further interest or charges to the account.

* pass/sell the account or outstanding balance to any third party.

* register any information in respect of the account with any of the credit reference agencies.

* issue a default notice related to the account.

 

Furthermore,I reserve my right to make a copy of this letter available for inspection to the Court and Financial/Consumer regulators should you fail to comply with this request.

I await your response,and should you need further clarification on any of the above points,then I suggest that you direct them to your legal department.

 

Yours Faithfully/Sincerely

**************

It took Bryan Carter until August to reply to this letter and they only sent the copy of the CCA, none of the other documants requested.

 

 

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This Is Normal For Carter

 

He Will Not Even Oblige With A Cpr Request

 

Send One Again To Him By Recorded Delievery

 

You Have 14 Days To Acknowledge The Claim So We Will Use It

 

Message For Site Team

 

Do We Have An Up To Date Cpr For Carter

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to edit this, send by recorded to the claimants solicitor and keep the receipt

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored][delete if no such request was delivered]

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the default notice*

 

* delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim.

 

[Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

 

# delete if claim for a sum exceeding £5,000.00

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully

 

 

 

CARTER WONT REPLY SO WE JUST THEN GO WITH AN EMBARRASED DEFENCE, THEN AS A NORM, CARTER WILL GIVE UP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just Me

Sorry

 

Ill Update Your Thread With A Cpr Request To Send To Carter If A Mod Does Not Do It First

 

Job's a good 'un.

 

If Bryan Carter sent me details of payments received, as requested, it would show that I have been paying them.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carter Will Send You Nothing

 

He Never Does

We Then Use That Against Him In Court

 

It says in the above letter that I will file defence against the whole claim, in that case do I fill in the income/expenditure form?

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You 1st need to find out if a proper court has sent you this document or not?

Its not unlike the industry to fake these things.

If it has come from an official court, then you need to contact them to inform them that you are already repaying & get advice from there....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...