Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Include that in your witness statement along with that letter as an exhibit.
    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Swinton car insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I missed D/D on the 1st June.

Didn't realise as I was on holiday but when i got home had 2 letters.

First letter dated 2nd June stating pay up or policy will be cancelled within 7 days.

Second letter dated 8th June ,Default Notice £12 charge plus pay up by 22nd June.

Stupidly didn't read letter properly/slipped my mind but when I phoned to sort it out told(some days later)told the policy had been cancelled and to pay remaining £88 to bring the policy up to date.(no rush as the policy had already been cancelled according to the first letter.)

23rd June received letter Swinton now want £118 including :discount and/or cashback recovery?? plus £45 cancellation fee.

Phoned and said i wasn't happy,told it would be passed on DCA within 7 days and would be charged a further £25.

Not bad money considering I'd only missed my payment 3 weeks before.

TNC Legal Services try to collect(£143) so I put in a CCA request with £1 postal order,heard nothing until today when Swinton write again asking for £118 again,pay up within 7 days to avoid further charges.

What sort of response should I give them seeing as I've already asked and paid for my CCA via TNC ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are a nightmare. I had my parents charges written off. They instructed debt collectors within 7 days (it was a £50 canx charge they were after - nothing else was owing).

 

I did it by following their complaints procedure (its on their website for addresses etc).

 

First I wrote to branch and asked for invoice and explanation in writing. They merely wrote back telling me they were instructing debt collectors and didn't answer any queries.

 

Then I wrote to Head office in Manchester complaining about them taking advantage of pensioners and asking why their branch office had seen fit to demand money and pass to debt collectors without offering any sort of explanation as to my queries in writing. (think they stuck an extra £35 on for the debt collector charge)

 

Debt collectors were chasing (Regal) whilst I was waiting a month for them to reply. I have since been told they are not allowed to chase as account was in dispute.

 

Head office wrote back after a month saying they would write the money off "as a gesture of goodwill"! Didn't even get an apology.

 

They are totally arrogant, treat people like dirt and I hate them with a vengeance so good luck!!

 

I did the above before I discovered CAG but I have posted it on another Swinton thread, I've also recently seen a post from someone else who had won on a cancellation charge. Search for the threads, there will be other info there.

 

Make them put everything in writing, they don't like it and contradict each other. Don't think the branch staff are capable of writing a letter so they'll slip up and probably give you ammunition to help with Ombudsman/FSA.

Edited by Jan4a
added info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone confirm that the default notice is invalid,dated 8th June stating action is required before 22nd June,from reading other posts I gather that Swinton should allow 2+ days for the post to reach me.8th of June was a Monday,so the date for me to pay the arrears and avoid the breach of contract should have been the 25th,am I corrrect?Am I also correct in saying that as Swinton terminated the contract without giving me sufficient time that I do not have to pay them anything,I was going to pay what I owed but was disputing the charges,due to the invalid default notice I'm under the impression that I now owe them zilch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read through the credit agreement and no mention of a £45 "cancellation fee"

Found this though under Miscellaneous;

 

21.This agreement becomes binding when it is signed by you.By making your first monthly payment(or by arranging with a third party for it to be made)you are confirmingthat you have signed this agreement and that you intend it to be fully binding and enforceable by us.

 

thoughts anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Greendollar

 

My parents circumstances were different in that they paid the whole premium upfront, so no credit. Parents bought a new car, insured it with a different company and just left the Swinton as it was due to run out in two weeks anyway. Swinton rang them 2 months later demanding a cancellation charge! And that charge was £50, so are others I've seen on here so don't know why yours is £45. Also says £50 on their T&C's on their website I think.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right , I hope I can get some help on here as well please. Again it involves Swinton and again it involves Regal credit.

My Wife lost her job back in the beginning of June due to her being diagnosed with Cervical Cancer , I had lost mine on Friday 13th February due to the recession, that is the background .

Okay, because my wife had no income she defaulted on her insurance for her car, She had a few nasty letters and a £12 charge slapped on her.

I contacted them and explained the situation, their attitude was less than pleasent and I was informed I had so many days to sort out the payment to bring the account up to date or the policy will be cancelled.

Suffice to say the policy was duly cancelled , we were informed that the vehicle was no longer insured and that to use it would be a criminal offence..the usual guff..

Fine , the car came off the road, as she was in no fit state to drive it anyway , and we used my car instead, which was and still is fully insured.

Then the letters and phone calls started from Regal demanding payment of £275 as payment for the balance outstanding, I.E, the balance left on the insurance.

I thought that if the policy had been cancelled by Swinton, in other words no longer exists , there surley is nothing to pay for ?.

Also the phone calls have taken a sinister twist. My wife is at home recovering from the surgery she had to undergo as a result of the cancer, it is imperitive her health improves so that she can commence chemo.

The calls are distressing her and knocking her back, I explained this to Swinton and they ignored this, the calls still continue, what can I do to shut these people down ?.

I was thinking of sending a letter basically outlining my point about cancelled policies or sending them a letter saying I shall pay this when my financial situation improves. But the latter acknowledges that a debt exists.

Any advice would be appreciated thanks

Edited by MisterBuster
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had a had a look at their T&C's on their website? And more to the point, their complaints procedure. Following the complaints procedure worked for me but my circumstances were slightly different. Not sure if people will advise you to do a SAR.

 

Regarding Regal, other people on here are better qualified in advising how to deal with debt collectors. You might be better starting your own thread titled something like "Swinton Insurance & Debt Collectors" so the relevant people will notice your thread and reply with better advice.

 

When I followed their complaints procedure I stressed that they were "bullying pensioners" (my parents) - this is true and why I hate them so much. So, whatever route you end up going down, ensure they are aware (in writing, by recorded delivery) of the the affect they are having on your wife.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Good to hear it.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...