Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hfo Services Cca Request Help!! *** Discontinued ***


bugsy123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4402 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 373
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

They have been there ages. Here’s the proof:

 

HFOIre.png

 

 

I also note that Mr Turnbull has also been removed from the list of those running the organisation. He has been removed from the Validor web site too. Maybe they are trying to distance him from all the dirty work he has done? I think the OFT will see through that... it won’t wash. Badri Nathan is still there and he is associated heavily with HFOS and Roxburghe.

 

I think Mr Turnbull is trying to save his Solicitors licence - dont think that is going to work is it.

 

I paid for a company print out and they did change address approx April last year - buggered if i know what i don with the print out now though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 months later...

WHOOP WHOOP!! Yipeeeeeeeee. HFO have discontinued and payed the best solicitor in the world grands in costs!! I'm free of the beast at last. Feel I should do a thank you speech. Firstly to my wonderful solicitor Paul. Your worth every penny of HFO's Grubby money. Big thanks to this amazing website who have kept me going over the last few years. Wouldnt be where I am today without ya. Donation on its way but you'll have to wait till pay day LOL! Big Big thanks to the HFO Fan club Donkey, Coledog, The brig, Broken arrow who shot it in the right direction for me and to anyone who helped on my thread. The only gripe left is that HFO Services are still updating my credit file and it was capital taking the action but thats another thread LOL. Signing off BUGSY123

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Bugsy it was a pleasure to help, tough luck HFO you should have took the offer, now its cost you.

well done to the fan clubs favourite sols on yet another discontinuance.

Edited by broken arrow

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite! HFO Services Ltd still exists – its parent company, HFO (UK) Holdings Ltd is in voluntary administration. However, it seems that HFO Services now has no employees, and that its affairs are possibly being managed (or should be being managed) by the liquidator.

 

That said, the HFO website now defaults to Turnbull Rutherford...

 

So if we find TR are chasing anything that belongs to HFO Services, there could be problems. But they are still entitled to chase HFO Capital (Ireland) accounts. However, I’m not sure TR are allowed to report the status of the accounts to CRAs. If someone is updating on behalf of HFO Services, you need to start asking the question – who is doing it, and on whose authority?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...