Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Connaught Debt, Please Help.


oddmaker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I had a debt from 1st Credit about 5 months ago so I sent them a letter saying please send me my signed agreement otherwise this debt isnt forceable. They sent me a letter back saying give us 4 weeks to send you the signed agreement of this debt, till this day I havent had my signed agreement sent to me then 2 weeks ago I got a letter from 1st Credit saying I can have 25% of this debt I owe to them. I ignored these letters and now I have a new letter from Connaught asking for the debt.

 

I need help on a letter to send to Connaught, can I send them a letter saying I sent a letter to 1st credit asking for the signed agreement on 20/05/09 and they they didn't produce the signed agreement so this debt isnt aplicable? Or some sort of letter? Any help would be great and a letter template of some sort.

 

Thank you very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick point - did you enclose the £1 fee with your CCA request?

 

Probably doesn't matter anyway, as their actions since indicate they know they have no agreement and they're fishing for any payment they can get. How long ago did you take out the alleged debt (I'm assumung it's a credit card)?

 

In the meantime, don't panic - and LTWFB and Sam's advice is spot on. As usual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I may need correcting, but this may mean your CCA request was invalid - unless, of course, their response so far means they have declined the need for payment. Wait and see what others think, but I believe it may be worth re-doing the CCA request with the £1 fee, then they are well and truly limited to 12+2 days before a default..

Link to post
Share on other sites

shame that they did not write back saying that you had not enclosed the fee,instead of acknowledging your request,and stating they have 40 days.and still failed.:rolleyes:

 

would just send in dispute.they have not got it,they know they cant get it.

we know they are stuffed.

 

1st miss out again.bet that quid was the only chance of any money for them.:D

 

SAM

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All, Back again and i got a new letter from 1st credit:

 

We acknowledge receipt of your complaint. In accordance with the regulations we detail our complanits procesdure below.

 

1 Complainants will be asked to put their complaint in writing. This will be to ensure no misunderstanding occurs as to the exact nature of the complaint. A complaint form will be provided if required.

 

2 Alternatively the complaint will be dealt with based upon verbal comments.

 

3 A written acknowledgement of a complaint will be sent to the complainant within 10 business days of its receipt, giving the name or job title of the individual handling the complaint for the company. If a final response can be prepared within 10 buisness days of receipt of a complaint, the company may combine its achnowledgement of the complaint with the final response.

 

4 Complaints are investigated by a designated person who has the authority to settle the complaint, or has ready acess to someone who has the authority.

 

5 Within 4 weeks of receiving a complaint 1st Credit Ltd will send the complainant either:

 

a) A fianl response which sets out the final view on the issue raised in a complaint and weather: The complaint is accepted and where appropriate, the redress, or, the complaint is rejected, and, where appropriate, the redress, or, the complaint was rejected with a reason of rejection;

 

b) A response which: Explains that 1st Credit Ltd is not in a position to make a final response, the reason for the delay and when it is exspected to be able to provide a final response;

 

c) At the end of eight weeks after its receipt 1st Credit Ltd will send the complainant either:

 

(1) A final responce; or (2) A response which:

 

explains that the firm is still not in a position to make a final response, gives resons for the further delay and indicated when it expects to be able to provide a fianl response; and

 

informs the complainant that they may refer the complaint to the Dinancial Ombudsman Service if they are dissatisfied with the delay, and encloses a copy of the Financial Ombudsman Service's explanatory leaflet.

 

Now I sent them a letter asking for my signed agreement for a 2nd time about a week ago and they sent me that letter above as well as a 50% off letter from Connaught Collections Uk Ltd which I know are the same company.

 

What should I do next? They are starting to **** me off, like flys round **** :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean this one?;

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On the **DATE** I wrote to you requesting a copy of the credit agreement and other information under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79).

 

On **DATE** a member of your staff signed for delivery of my written request and I have an electronic proof of delivery showing their signature and the date.

 

To date you have failed to comply with these requests in any way, whether by confirmation of receipt of the request or by supplying the requested documents.

 

These documents I requested should be readily available as proof of your legal right to collect this account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

In my letter of the **DATE** I made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account under section 77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore

 

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

If that request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days your client commits a summary criminal offence.

 

These limits have expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

And

 

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got a letter today, seems they are trying harder but I may need some help:

 

Thank you for your letter of the 2nd September 2009. A copy of our complaints procedure has been sent under separate cover.

 

We recognise your complaint relates to 1st Credit not providing a copy of the agreement within the timeframes defined within the CCA 1974.

 

Having investigated your account I find as follows:

 

Pusuant to your request for a copy of the agreement we have contacted Barclaycard for the necessary documentation. As previously advised, on receipt of this information a copy shall be forwarded to you.

 

A copy of the statement of account as defined by the CCA 1974 has been provided in our earlier letter. For your ease of redernce I can again confirm as follows;

 

A. The state of the account - outstanding balance of £(I'm blanking it)

B. The account, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor the full outstanding balance £(I'm blanking it)

C. The amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor - £(I'm blanking it)

 

Should you require copies of statements detailing all credits and debits on the account I would advise this is considered a Subject Acess Request. Under the Datae Protection Act 1998 we are entitled to charge an administration fee of £10.00 to provide this information.

 

On receipt of the fee will contact Barclaycard on your behalf. Alternatively you may with to contact Barclaycard directly for the information.

 

We note that the Copy Agreement will not have been supplied within the specified time however, if an offence is committed, that does not affect the rights and duties between us. The Consumer Credit Act 1974 provides defences to any offence which we believe would apply in this case where we have to obtain documents and information to answer your request from the original creditor.

 

We are fully aware that we connot enforce a debt until the CCA request has been adhered to. Our client states that although currently unenforeable, the debt remains due and payable.

 

I am unaware of any legislation that states a default notice or data that is believed to be correct must be removed whilst a CCA request is being dealt with.

 

You have not specified upon which ground you rely for your notice under s10 of the Data Protection Act and therefore we do not consider this valid; furthermore this is not a valid request as it falls under the exemption in Schedule 2 section 2(a) of the Act.

 

Our aim is to resolve all complaints internally. However, in the event you remain dissatisfied with our response, you may refer the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service within six months of the date of this letter. A copy of their lealet is enclosed.

We hope that we can resolve matters for you before you take this step.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Gemma Jackson

Compliance Officer

 

They seem to be getting nasty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...