Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Asda-drydens Solicitors-notice Of Intended Civil Recovery


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5009 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI I HAVEN'T POSTED THREADS BEFORE SO BEAR WITH ME, A MONTH OR SO AGO I WAS, RIGHTFULLY, ARRESTED AND CAUTIONED FOR SHOPLIFTING IN ASDA-A BAG OF FROZEN MUSSELLS (??:confused:??) , A £3.99 BOOK AND SOME HAM...-

I BOUGHT THE REST OF MY SHOPPING COMING TO £20+

I WAS ISSUED PENALTY FINE WHICH IM PAYING IN INSTALLMENTS, AS IM ON BENEFITS FOR SOCIAL PHOBIA,ANXIETY ETC

I WAS PRETTY SCARED BUT POLICE WERE FINE WITH ME AND I LEARNED MY LESSON, ANY HOW I RECEIVED A LETTER FROM DRYDEN'S SOLICITORS ACTING ON BEHALF OF ASDA AND WANT £150 FOR SECURITY COSTS. IF I DO NOT PAY WITHIN 7 DAYS,WHICH HAS PASSED,IT WILL GO UP BETWEEN £80-£150 FOR COURT COSTS. IM TOO SCARED TO RING THEM AS I'VE READ ON HERE THEY'RE "AGGRESSIVE BULLIES" .

I ADMITTED THE OFFENCE.

IS THERE ANYTHING I CAN DO?

IM WORRYING LOADS OVER IT AS THE THREAT OF BAILLIFFS ATTENDING AND CCJ ETC IS KINDA BAD, ESPECIALLY AS I LIVE WITH MY MUM!!

I WAS ALSO BANNED FROM ASDA :|

THANK-YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO READ AND PLEASE, ANY ADVICE WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not sure if you understood, but the bump is to bring your thread back to the top, so it doesn't get missed.

Most of the cases posted here involve RLP, but Drydens are operating the same scheme, i.e., civil recovery. Just ignore them, it is unlikely that they will proceed to court. You are paying the police PND, I guess this is punishment enough, and you would be very silly to try to steal from shops again, as you have seen, it costs more than the stuff you stole.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Please keep us up to dat eon the progress of this.

 

If they sue you, they will have to establish their actual losses and will only be bale to recoup those

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Please keep us up to dat eon the progress of this.

 

If they sue you, they will have to establish their actual losses and will only be bale to recoup those

 

 

This is just a personal observation on this and not a case of this always happening. I was involved with a case of an employee who was caught stealing cash and phone top ups. During the civil recovery process the store management guesstimated the amount of costs at £300. The representative of the lad caught refused to pay and asked for a full breakdown. The profit protection manager came in and interviewed a few people about their involvement with the case. It turned out that in the new submission of costs came to over £2800, and this was a legitimate charge. Personally, I would have kept quiet and paid the money first time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi Bill,

I was once involved in a similar case having calculated the actual costs it was a staggering, £280,000,000, I had to go to hospital shortly after.

PS your not the bill who used to be in the bed opposite where I was treated for an overdose of Bovine Excreta.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Rebellfoxx, Sorry about the hijack of your thread, on a serious note dont worry these company's make plenty of money from people they frighten into paying, they even Troll forums like ours leaving, at best misinformation at worst lies to confuse the OP.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys just dont get it do you. It isnt RLP, Drydens and the like that calculate the costs, it is the retailer. Like all solicitors, which is what they are, they are instructed.

 

Now oldandrew. Stop hijacking threads and try to be constructive rather than being petty and calling people names.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018
You guys just dont get it do you. It isnt RLP, Drydens and the like that calculate the costs, it is the retailer. Like all solicitors, which is what they are, they are instructed.

 

Now oldandrew. Stop hijacking threads and try to be constructive rather than being petty and calling people names.

 

What names are being called, the OP needs to know what happens with these companies, and about Trolls, on this and other forums.

A Troll is typically on-line for a time then disappears in to the ether.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I am genuine. There is only one of me.

 

 

Genuine or not....one of you is still one too many.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys just dont get it do you. It isnt RLP, Drydens and the like that calculate the costs, it is the retailer. Like all solicitors, which is what they are, they are instructed.

 

Now oldandrew. Stop hijacking threads and try to be constructive rather than being petty and calling people names.

 

 

It isn't the retailers who 'calculate' the cost it's RLP. Apart from the retail value their charges are fixed at time of contract. How do I know................ guess;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't the retailers who 'calculate' the cost it's RLP. Apart from the retail value their charges are fixed at time of contract. How do I know................ guess;)

 

 

So the recovery companies guess how many hours people spend on investigation??

 

The recovery companies know what covert equiptment was used in an investigation.

 

The recovery companies know who worked on an investigation?

 

 

How do you know?

 

The same as all the rest of the thief supporting liberal whingers, oh I stole from a shop and look how much they are charging me. You know only what you want to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thieves should be horse whipped

 

As for what amounts to a thieves well I would prefer them to be convicted in a court of law before claiming they ARE actually a thief & not rely on some jumped up little jobs-worth OR retailer who see a few bob in it for themselves especially when an item costs £3.99p & they demand £137! from each of the 2 elderly shoppers

 

Like I said apart from the cost of the item their charges are fixed

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the recovery companies guess how many hours people spend on investigation??

 

The recovery companies know what covert equiptment was used in an investigation.

 

The recovery companies know who worked on an investigation?

 

 

How do you know?

 

The same as all the rest of the thief supporting liberal whingers, oh I stole from a shop and look how much they are charging me. You know only what you want to know.

 

You should be banned from this forum for calling it's members "thief supporting liberal whingers".

 

That is an absolute insult to all who has posted on this board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry Button, the poster in question is probably one of those who thinks anyone accused of a crime is guilty even before they've been tried in court. I find they don't believe in civil liberties............. except their own

Link to post
Share on other sites

Billybumpkins - Please spare a thought (whether you are a parent or not) of the innocent and vulnerable children and adults on this forum that haven't committed a crime, haven't stolen, haven't incurred a loss to a company but have been subjected to all the goings on relating to untrained security staff, loss prevention staff that haven't a clue, RLP plus their numerous debt collection agencies and threats that come with it.

 

I'm with you Button!

 

Joncris - Count me in on your meeting

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...