Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PayDay UK (MEM Finance)...Worried Sick!!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I took out a payday loan with the above company a few years, back, defaulted on it and it was transferred to 1st Credit.

 

I moved address, married, changed my name but due to all the debts that I had at that time I forgot about the debt.

 

Payday UK/MEM contacted me this week and asked me to pay a £15 token payment on the account and then to set up a payment arrangement with them.

 

I was happy to do this and paid the £15 with my debit card.

 

I am now worried that they will try to debit my card for the remainign £135 debt without my authorisation.

 

I really need some help and advice :-)

 

Thanks

Katpuss

:!: Activ Kapital 2009 - £316 debt cancelled due to no credit agreement

 

:!: TNC Legal Collections (Swinton) - £61 written off due to complaint being upheld with the FOS

 

:D Be Happy and treat people exactly how you would like to be treated

 

:mad: Don't let people take advantage of you and stand up for your rights and beliefs

 

:p You only live once so don't take things so seriously

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Katpuss

 

They wouldn't think twice. I would 'lose' card and get replacement then get their bank details and set up standing order to repay. Money can sometimes be taken from cancelled cards and not easy to stop this without getting new bank account. Also avoid direct debits as they can set these up to take what they like.

 

Sorry I can't reassure you but unless you stop the card you will be at their mercy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely if a company or individual takes a card payment without your authorisation that is illegal and you can ask your bank to perform a charge back ?

 

Unfortunately not. Once you give someone your card details they have what I think the banks refer to as 'continuius payment authorisation' which basically means that they can take whatever they like whenever they like. Crazy I know but true (I have argued this point with banks more times than I care to remember) once the arrangement is in place it is up to you to prove that you have cancelled it.

 

So the best thing to do is send the company in question a letter / email immediately expressly revoking any authorisation to use the card with immediate effect. Also advise them that you have sent a copy of this email / letter to your bank so that anything they take will be fraud. Then keep a copy of th letter / email to recalim anything they do take.

 

Having learnt from previous, very bitter experience NEVER give your debit card details to anyone. If you must give card details make sure its a credit card as you then have charge back rights.

 

Hope that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some good advice here but still worth cancelling that card. Not 100% effective but does offer you some protection. Some banks better than others for making sure rogue payments don't go through.

 

Sorry I should have made that more clear - the above is intended to be done AFTER you have cancelled the card. Robjam1969 is quite right the card should be cancelled as a matter of priorty, the rest is your damage limitation plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately not. Once you give someone your card details they have what I think the banks refer to as 'continuius payment authorisation' which basically means that they can take whatever they like whenever they like. Crazy I know but true (I have argued this point with banks more times than I care to remember) once the arrangement is in place it is up to you to prove that you have cancelled it.

 

So the best thing to do is send the company in question a letter / email immediately expressly revoking any authorisation to use the card with immediate effect. Also advise them that you have sent a copy of this email / letter to your bank so that anything they take will be fraud. Then keep a copy of th letter / email to recalim anything they do take.

 

Having learnt from previous, very bitter experience NEVER give your debit card details to anyone. If you must give card details make sure its a credit card as you then have charge back rights.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Sorry Ellie but this is not correct. There are strict guildlines where taking card payments are concerned. Under the Data Protection act the company is not allowed to hang on to them, so another payment would be in breach of the DP act. You are thinking of things like subscriptions on the internet that are monthly that are difficult to cancel. It is safe to use your cards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sammy

 

I have to disagree. Technically you may be right but these companies continue to take payments in this way and the banks let them. Halifax told me they certain companies could force payments through on cancelled cards let alone current ones.

 

Very difficult to argue with these people. I prefer to make sure money stays in my account - a much stronger bargaining position.

 

Occasionally you can get them to refund from what I have seen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sammy

 

I have to disagree. Technically you may be right but these companies continue to take payments in this way and the banks let them. Halifax told me they certain companies could force payments through on cancelled cards let alone current ones.

 

Very difficult to argue with these people. I prefer to make sure money stays in my account - a much stronger bargaining position.

 

Occasionally you can get them to refund from what I have seen.

 

When card details are taken they the softwear that takes the payments t does not retain the numbers in the system. Unless you write them down while you take them you cannot use them again. To write them down is against the Data Protection act . If companies are doing this it is illegal.

My view of financial insitutions is dim at the moment, and if this is happening it is extremley serious.

 

I have heard of direct debits being taken for more than the amount agreed, this can be rectified by a complaint to BACS.If you agree to a subscription over a period on a credit card it can be very difficult to stop the money going out , banks cant stop it, and it is hard to find the source. I would advise anybody never to do that.

 

But on the intial point, it is totally illegal under the data protection act.It is theft ..go to the police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cancell That Card

Now

 

They Will Keep Calling A Figure Untill They Get A Hit And Empty Your Account

 

The Banks Will Not Want To Know

 

They Use A Thing Called A continiouse Credit Mandate

Thats The Firs 12 Didgits On Your Card, Even If You Cancell The Card, Payments Can Still Be Forced Through

 

Tell The Bank To Put a Stop On The Card When You Request A New One

 

Say You Lost The Card And You Want A stop Put On The Card

 

been There, Done That, Got The T Shirt And Bank Charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

I called back MEM on Friday last week to basically check a few details and to ask some questions.

 

Surprisingly I was put through to the same guy I spoke to when I paid the £15 token payment. He was really helpful and explained that as I actually owed £115 my £50 per month for 2 months and then £15 for the last month payment proposal would be absolutely fine.

 

I am more than happy to pay this just to get rid of the debt to be honest and luckily I am now in a position to afford this.

 

I did ask him also if my debit card details remained on file for them to take money if they wanted to and he explained that because the account was 4 years old and no longer had a valid credit agreement my debit card detials could not be used and would not stay on the system.

 

He was friendly, helpful and I was happy and am no longer worried.

:!: Activ Kapital 2009 - £316 debt cancelled due to no credit agreement

 

:!: TNC Legal Collections (Swinton) - £61 written off due to complaint being upheld with the FOS

 

:D Be Happy and treat people exactly how you would like to be treated

 

:mad: Don't let people take advantage of you and stand up for your rights and beliefs

 

:p You only live once so don't take things so seriously

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Ellie but this is not correct. There are strict guildlines where taking card payments are concerned. Under the Data Protection act the company is not allowed to hang on to them, so another payment would be in breach of the DP act. You are thinking of things like subscriptions on the internet that are monthly that are difficult to cancel. It is safe to use your cards.

 

I am sure that you are correct sammythebest, as this would indeed make logical sense and this is the argument I have used with the banks in the past. However as others have stated this is not what happens in practice and the banks allow this to happen. I had to threaten mine with court action on this very matter.

 

The moral of the tale I am afraid must therefore remain, don't give debit card details to anyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE

 

I've spoke to the CCCS about this company and they have advised me to dispute the debt and to request a copy of the credit agreement which I am going to do.

 

However the company are now calling me today (to get payment) and I've just received my 5th call. From how I see this is that as they are calling me to get payment they obviously cannot use my debit card to take any payments.

 

When I spoke to the guy at the company he advised me that as the debt was so old that card details could not be saved against the debt, hence why they keep calling.

 

What do you all think?

:!: Activ Kapital 2009 - £316 debt cancelled due to no credit agreement

 

:!: TNC Legal Collections (Swinton) - £61 written off due to complaint being upheld with the FOS

 

:D Be Happy and treat people exactly how you would like to be treated

 

:mad: Don't let people take advantage of you and stand up for your rights and beliefs

 

:p You only live once so don't take things so seriously

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Katpuss

 

Looks like you have two options. You can follow CCCS advice, get everything in writing and refuse to talk to them. Alternatively you can keep to your repayment arrangement but ensure you only agree to pay by standing order.

 

Difficult to say without knowing a little more about how much you owe them, any interest thats been added or any charges applied.

 

If you are in for the long haul unlikely they will want to go to court. At least you are in control now:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Katpuss

 

Looks like you have two options. You can follow CCCS advice, get everything in writing and refuse to talk to them. Alternatively you can keep to your repayment arrangement but ensure you only agree to pay by standing order.

 

Difficult to say without knowing a little more about how much you owe them, any interest thats been added or any charges applied.

 

If you are in for the long haul unlikely they will want to go to court. At least you are in control now:)

 

I owe £115 (was £130 but paid £15 a few weeks back).

 

I think I might try the standing order option so I can control what I pay them which is much safer.

 

It's quite funny that they don't have my debit card details and that they are constantly calling me to get payment!

:!: Activ Kapital 2009 - £316 debt cancelled due to no credit agreement

 

:!: TNC Legal Collections (Swinton) - £61 written off due to complaint being upheld with the FOS

 

:D Be Happy and treat people exactly how you would like to be treated

 

:mad: Don't let people take advantage of you and stand up for your rights and beliefs

 

:p You only live once so don't take things so seriously

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grrrrrrr already typed this once then my server crashed. Bugger, here we go again then.

 

Don't take the telephone call. Email the company / write to them saying 'all future correspondence in writing please, DO NOT CALL ME'. If they persist in calling (they will) email them back saying you have asked them to stop calling, they have ignored your request and this is therefore willful harrassment. CC the financial ombudsman & the OFT into the second email. This will stop them.

 

You must be very firm about the everything in writing stipulation as a) it will stop the 700 calls a day and b) it means you have a record of everything should you ever need it as evidence (which I feel is extremely unlikely).

 

You have every right to request written confirmation of the agreement / details of the account, etc and they HAVE to provide you with it. If not you simply don't pay them.

 

So I would simply do the above, sit back and see what paperwork arrives and take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...