Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is great news. Many people would have given up and paid after losing two appeals so well done for hanging in and fighting. It has paid off and they have finally backed down before getting whipped in Court. I looked at your NTD and your NTK again to see if there was a chance of going for a breach of your GDPR. Sadly although your NTK on its own could have well deserved a claim, the NTD is good enough not to warrant a claim even though it wasn;t compliant with PoFA. As it is the first Notice that mostly accounts for  GDPR breaches there is a reasonable cause for the NTD to have been issued. However you are now freed from worries about appearing in Court and you have learnt about the dangers of parking especially where the rogues that patrol private parking spaces are concerned. Thank you for making a donation and should you fall victim in the future to the parking rogues or anything else that we protect from, you are always welcome .
    • Hi guys I'm about to submit the defence as per below     There has been no reply to our CPR 31:14 request.  Is it worth adding that I (driver, not registered keeper) didn't actually enter or park in the car park and was sat at the petrol station forecourt the entire time?  Or is that covered by the simple points?   Thanks
    • a DCA is not a bailiff and cant enforce anything, even if they've been to court who are they please? sar to the original creditor FIO isnt applicable they are not a public body. who was this query sent too all the more reason to teach her young upon how these powerless DCA's monsters  work... she must stop payments now  
    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Five Questions,2 Disputes And Cabot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5236 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I am hoping some of you could help me with the five questions below?My credit files are as yet unscaithed and I have been playing the bat and ball game of letter writing with Cabot and feel its time to tell them to put up or shut up! The five questions if answered will give me the help needed in putting together a final response to the DCA, and I thank you all in advance for any advice given....

question 1:- Cabot are insistent that this is an enforceable CCA, could some-one just confirm(again) that it is incorrect please... http://i576.photobucket.com/albums/ss209/marcog111/21052009242.jpg

 

question 2:- I have received no default notice,and even my SAR did not contain either a `default notice` or a `NOA`(though CABOT did send a representation of a NOA).What do i do about this and is there any significance to not recieving either?

 

question 3:- My SAR was incomplete(BOS state some info not available)However the statement of account states 13.11.02 bad debt w/o.....credit 2###.64....balance 0.00..Cabot claim to be assigned the debt on 18.12.02 over a month later,is there any arguement that the balance is zero?

 

question 4:- should ppi have a seperate repayment schedule or APR?

question 5:- Cabot have now sent me a letter offering 50% discount(recieved day after SAR was recieved)could this mean they know they are onto a loser?

Again i really do appreciate any help or advice given

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Is that really all they sent you in reply to your CCA request?

http://i576.photobucket.com/albums/ss209/marcog111/21052009242.jpg

 

Now CCA's are not my forte, but from what little knowledge I have of them, even I can see that it is very questionable!

 

If you have never received a DN how are you supposed to know your in debt?

 

To be honest no-one has proved you actually owe this money?

 

Crapbot need a damn good hiding, tell them you are seeking legal advice with a view to taking them to court for false accusations, harassment, and just plain idiotic behaviour!

 

Report them to the OFT at the very

least;[email protected]

The Office of Fair Trading: Contact us

 

https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us.aspx

 

Consumer Direct

 

How to Complain

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou bazooka boo,they did send 14 pages of terms and conditions but thats all they sent with relevance to my CCA request.The sar from `bank of scotland` was not much better:)

 

It doesn't seem to me that they are overly concerned to get their money?

 

I would have thought that if someone owed money, they would certainly try alot harder to get it back:confused:

 

Hopefully a CCA expert will pick up on this thread now, and you can get some further advice regarding this, the 50% reduction 'one time offer' is a little gimmick they like to use. Hoping that you will miraculously think 'Oh yeah, now that's a good offer'

 

It may be, but not when you consider they will have paid as little as 16 pence in the pound for the debt.:eek:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive forwarded a complaint to TS and the OFT:D.and thankyou babybear39.

can anyone offer advice on the other questions especially the zero balance and no default notice or noa please..again many thanks guys n gals

Link to post
Share on other sites

just wondering if the original creditor never issued a DN or NOA and they returned the balance to zero before selling to Cabot would that mean that there is no debt to actually collect? getting a wee bit confused as to the relevance of no DN....:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

just wondering if the original creditor never issued a DN or NOA and they returned the balance to zero before selling to Cabot would that mean that there is no debt to actually collect? getting a wee bit confused as to the relevance of no DN....:)

 

A Default notice is simply a record placed on your file by creditors stating that you have been in default in some way. Such notices may have been placed without your knowledge and despite a subsequent remedy to the default.

Under the terms of your credit agreement you will probably have agreed that the lender has the right to inform the credit agencies of any default.

A default notice is a formal letter sent to you by a lender or creditor if you are in arrears with your account. Creditors and lenders are legally obliged to advise you formally in writing that you have missed payments.

 

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you receive a DN it would clearly state what action you should remedy and a time in which you should remedy this action by so as not to place a marker on your file.

In laymans terms, pay us this amount by this date and no further action will be taken.

 

But if they have failed to provide you with ay correspondence then the following may be of some use;

Notice pursuant to s.10 of The Data Protection Act 1998.

 

 

 

 

 

Re: account no. xxxxxxxxxxxx

Account holder. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Address. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Whereas I have been a customer of xxxxx since xxxxx and whereas I consented in my contract with you to the disclosure by you of certain data to third parties, at no time did I consent and neither was it within the contemplation of the parties to the contract that I did consent to the processing by you of that data in any manner which would be unfair or inaccurate or which in any way would breach The Data Protection Act 1998

 

Therefore Take Notice that I require that you cease from processing within 7 days of the receipt by you of this notice or else that you do not begin to process any personal data of which I am the subject insofar as that processing involves the communication or passing of personal data of which I am the subject to any third party and insofar as the said data relates wholly or in part to the implementation by you of charges which have been applied to my account in respect of defaults or contractual breaches and where the said charges which have been levied at a rate which is in excess of the administrative costs incurred by you as a consequence of the said defaults or breaches contrary to The Common Law.

 

This Notice is given on the grounds that the processing or continued processing by you of the said data will be likely to affect my credit rating and my reputation and cause substantial damage and/or substantial distress to me and my family members in addition to that which may already have been caused and that as the processing of the said data in the way referred to in this notice would violate the fourth, first and sixth principles of The Data Protection Act 1998 to do so would be unwarranted.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again bazooka boo,but what happens if the account clearly shows a zero balance before its sold to a DCA?.my SAR shows the balance at zero then a month later the debt is assigned(as Cabot claim)a month later,would that mean that only the arrears is due as they seem to have clearly written the debt off and terminated the account even though they never issued a default notice?sorry for all the questions im just trying to get my head around this so i can try and put this to rest(for now)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again bazooka boo,but what happens if the account clearly shows a zero balance before its sold to a DCA?.my SAR shows the balance at zero then a month later the debt is assigned(as Cabot claim)a month later,would that mean that only the arrears is due as they seem to have clearly written the debt off and terminated the account even though they never issued a default notice?sorry for all the questions im just trying to get my head around this so i can try and put this to rest(for now)

 

 

OK, if the account 'clearly' shows ZERO, then there is absolutely no question you owe anyone any money!:D

 

If Crapbot are saying that you owe them money and you can clearly see that you don't, drag them through the courts..,

Seek legal advice and put this ridiculous farcical company out of their misery..you should tell them to stop processing your personal data;

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/586-legal-notice-issued-under-section-10-of-the-data-protection-act-1980

  • Haha 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

again many thanks bazooka boo, i will fire of a letter on monday with a copy of what the OC sent me which shows the balance at zero.your a star and im truely grateful

Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S.

Not Defending the lowlifes, but DCA's are employed by the OC (technically) So if the DCA is asking you for money from an alleged debt with a bank, then it is the bank who is answerable to their chosen DCA's tactics.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it would seem that now the consumers are gathering knowledge through sites like this that maybe the tides are changeing, i think the banks are learning a long over due lesson in morality(lets hope:))

Link to post
Share on other sites

again many thanks bazooka boo, i will fire of a letter on monday with a copy of what the OC sent me which shows the balance at zero.your a star and im truely grateful

 

We Are all at one time indebted to this fantastic site, those that are now aware of CAG are now better informed and much better aware of our rights.

What I have learnt has been from here, and I readily donate a small token of my appreciation.:D

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again all,just wondering while typing up a letter for CABOT,should i mention that i have never recieved a DN? also as the account has a ZERO balance(SAR statement clearly shows a balance of 0.00) before it was sold(1 month later) to CABOT does that mean its a terminated account and only the arrears are a collectable debt? really sorry for all the questions but even with the fantastic help im still a little confused:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there all,just a few answers from you experts if possible please.BOS not replied to my letter yet!Cabot however want me to send them evidence of the differences between the BOS SAR and the information that Cabot have provided,they also state that they are the sole owners of the account.So im wondering if any one could advise me.The account has a zero balance as of 13/11/02 as seen in pic below...

http://i576.photobucket.com/albums/ss209/marcog111/17072009257.jpg

Cabot then purchased the debt on the 18/12/02.Would this mean that they bought a debt valued at £0.00? there has never been a Default notice sent to me and only CABOT have managed an NOA though that seems to be their`special` constructed on headed paper! BOS dont seem to have a NOA and its one of the things im waiting for an answer to?To I tell CABOT that i have never recieved a DEFAULT NOTICE?

Any advice would be really appreciated and thankyou in advance:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...