Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The private submersible industry was shaken after the implosion of the OceanGate Titan sub last year.View the full article
    • further polished WS using above suggestions and also included couple of more modifications highlighted in orange are those ok to include?   Background   1.1  The Defendant received the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) on the 06th of January 2020 following the vehicle being parked at Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip on the 05th of December 2019.   Unfair PCN   2.1  On 19th December 2023 the Defendant sent the Claimant's solicitors a CPR request.  As shown in Exhibit 1 (pages 7-13) sent by the solicitors the signage displayed in their evidence clearly shows a £60.00 parking charge notice (which will be reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days of issue).  2.2  Yet the PCN sent by the Claimant is for a £100.00 parking charge notice (reduced to £60 if paid within 30 days of issue).   2.3        The Claimant relies on signage to create a contract.  It is unlawful for the Claimant to write that the charge is £60 on their signs and then send demands for £100.    2.4        The unlawful £100 charge is also the basis for the Claimant's Particulars of Claim.  No Locus Standi  3.1  I do not believe a contract with the landowner, that is provided following the defendant’s CPR request, gives MET Parking Services a right to bring claims in their own name. Definition of “Relevant contract” from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4,  2 [1] means a contract Including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land between the driver and a person who is-   (a) the owner or occupier of the land; or   (b) Authorised, under or by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land. According to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44   For a contract to be valid, it requires a director from each company to sign and then two independent witnesses must confirm those signatures.   3.2  The Defendant requested to see such a contract in the CPR request.  The fact that no contract has been produced with the witness signatures present means the contract has not been validly executed. Therefore, there can be no contract established between MET Parking Services and the motorist. Even if “Parking in Electric Bay” could form a contract (which it cannot), it is immaterial. There is no valid contract.  Illegal Conduct – No Contract Formed   4.1 At the time of writing, the Claimant has failed to provide the following, in response to the CPR request from myself.   4.2        The legal contract between the Claimant and the landowner (which in this case is Standard Life Investments UK) to provide evidence that there is an agreement in place with landowner with the necessary authority to issue parking charge notices and to pursue payment by means of litigation.   4.3 Proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and country Planning Act 1990. Lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under this Act and no contract can be formed where criminality is involved.   4.4        I also do not believe the claimant possesses these documents.   No Keeper Liability   5.1        The defendant was not the driver at the time and date mentioned in the PCN and the claimant has not established keeper liability under schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. In this matter, the defendant puts it to the claimant to produce strict proof as to who was driving at the time.   5.2 The claimant in their Notice To Keeper also failed to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 section 9[2][f] while mentioning “the right to recover from the keeper so much of that parking charge as remains unpaid” where they did not include statement “(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)”.     5.3         The claimant did not mention parking period, times on the photographs are separate from the PCN and in any case are that arrival and departure times not the parking period since their times include driving to and from the parking space as a minimum and can include extra time to allow pedestrians and other vehicles to pass in front.    Protection of Freedoms Act 2012   The notice must -   (a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;  22. In the persuasive judgement K4GF167G - Premier Park Ltd v Mr Mathur - Horsham County Court – 5 January 2024 it was on this very point that the judge dismissed this claim.  5.4  A the PCN does not comply with the Act the Defendant as keeper is not liable.  No Breach of Contract   6.1       No breach of contract occurred because the PCN and contract provided as part of the defendant’s CPR request shows different post code, PCN shows HA4 0EY while contract shows HA4 0FY. According to PCN defendant parked on HA4 0EY which does not appear to be subject to the postcode covered by the contract.  6.2         The entrance sign does not mention anything about there being other terms inside the car park so does not offer a contract which makes it only an offer to treat,  Interest  7.1  It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for  Double Recovery   7.2  The claim is littered with made-up charges.  7.3  As noted above, the Claimant's signs state a £60 charge yet their PCN is for £100.  7.4  As well as the £100 parking charge, the Claimant seeks recovery of an additional £70.  This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims.  7.5 Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated “Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones- Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates (...) in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared (…) the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.”  7.6 In Claim Nos. F0DP806M and F0DP201T, District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ''It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverabl15e under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4)) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''  7.7 In the persuasive case of G4QZ465V - Excel Parking Services Ltd v Wilkinson – Bradford County Court -2 July 2020 (Exhibit 4) the judge had decided that Excel had won. However, due to Excel adding on the £60 the Judge dismissed the case.  7.8        The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.   7.9        It is the Defendant’s position that the Claimant in this case has knowingly submitted inflated costs and thus the entire claim should be similarly struck out in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 3.3(4).   In Conclusion   8.1        I invite the court to dismiss the claim.  Statement of Truth  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   
    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

no jsa for 5 weeks!


angryandy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, just wondering if any of you would be able to help me.

 

I left my self employed job on the 2nd june as i was making a loss rather than a profit.

 

I spoke to job centre plus who confirmed that i was entitled to job seekers allowance but would have to fill some forms in and make a few telephone calls etc etc.

 

At this time i let working tax credits know that i was no longer working so they would stop paying me. They said they will give me four weeks roll on of the tax credits as they do but it would be in the form of a giro rather than in my bank account.

All well and good so far but the thing is now is that i still haven't recieved any jsa so far and i won't get any until the 3rd july. They say they won't back date it to the 2nd june because i was still getting tax credits.

From what i got told when i first went the job centre they said they would still back date it. Basically i want to know who is right. Are they trying it on or are they in their rights to do this? Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks

Andy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Backdating is only usually done to the date you made the claim. Anything beyond that date is very rare. If you were receiving Tax Credit then depending on the amount you received they are right, as the JSA will likely be Income Based, which means that your benefit is reduced in line with your other household income.

 

I say this because self employed people usually pay class 2 NI rather than class 1. In order to receive contribution based jobseekers, you need to have paid enough class 1 NI contributions in the two years before you claimed jobseekers to qualify for contributory JSA.

 

In a nutshell, it is not the Jobcentre who are right, and they should not be giving you advice on whether or not the claim will be backdated, because ultimately it is the processing team who deal with your claim and who are fully trained in the processing of it.

 

What reason did the jobcentre say the claim would be backdated?

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Erika.

 

They never really give me a reason. I had my first interview on the 9th June and the first time i signed was on the 16th.

It was during the first interview that the guy said that i will recieve my first payment three days after signing on and it would be back dated to the 2nd June. I should have recieved my first payment then on the 19th June which would be back dated to the 2nd.

I checked my bank on the 19th and nothing had been paid in. A good few phone calls and some days later i spoke to someone in the processing department who said i wasn't getting backpaid but they would send me an emergency payment of £31 and something pence. Thisn has got to last me until a week Friday.

That is the situation at the moment but i have two children to feed and my rent is due on the 1st. I have no savings as my old job didn't pay enough to put away for a 'rainy day'.

Also i have spoke to the council and they say it will take four weeks from now to process my claim for housing benefit. This is all well and good but considering i left my job on the 2nd June it will have been eight weeks before i get a penny to pay for my rent.

I think i must add also that this is the first time i have been on JSA and i do want to find work. I just need some help to do this and i feel that job centre plus and the local council are trying to make things as hard as possible for me in the hope i go back to my old job.

 

Thanks for taking the time to read my thread and answering it. Anymore advice would be great if you can!!!!

Andy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rest assured that whilst you will come across some people in these positions with an unfortunate attitude and ones who provide the wrong information there are some who will go out of their way to help. That doesn't help you at the moment though, I know.

 

The jobcentre should never have advised you it would be backdated as I said. This is for the processing team to decide.

 

Ask the processing section what your "date of claim" is. This is the date the form is received in any jobcentreplus office, if you completed a claim form that is, or if you telephoned to claim it is the date you claimed over the telephone. That is your "date of claim" and is when any back payment should be made to, but as I said any other "household income" is taken into account so it may not be backdated if the income was above the threshold

 

What you have received is an "interim payment" by the sounds of it, if it was issued by jobseekers allowance. This is designed to "get you by".

 

What they have given you calculates as less than the living expenses you need to last that length of time, particularly if you have children. Once that money runs out, if you have no other means of income and have no food/gas/electricity, ask the jobcentre for the telephone number for Crisis Loans. This is a free phone telephone number and it varies depending on where you live. I will pre warn you it can take ages to get through as they are extremely busy. When you hear the automated voice giving you the options, the one you want is Crisis Loans/living expenses. It usually goes like this: press any key to continue, then option 1 at the first menu and option 2 at the second menu. (No, I don't ring Crisis Loans regularly, I just support people in getting their entitlements!). The best time to get through is early in the morning, the lines open in some areas at 8:30, though in some areas it is 9am. Tell them the situation, that you are waiting for JSA to be sorted out, how long it's been, they will ask questions such as other resources you may have. There is a catch to this......if you are entitled to JSA and should have had your payment but the payment of your benefit is delayed, and it is not your error, Crisis Loans will liaise with JSA processing to sort it out ASAP. This is because Crisis Loans should not be paid when benefit is due. In the meantime, if Crisis Loans feel there is a serious and immediate threat to your health and safety or that of your family, they will issue a payment that same day to you. You pop down to the local jobcentre with two forms of ID, sign the offer letter and get your giro. This soes have to be paid back out of your JSA once it is in payment, but essentially, if it is due to be paid and hasn't been they will see to it that it gets paid. But be aware if it is not yet due for any reason, they will not be able to liaise with JSA, and you don't need to ask them to liase. They can access basic details about your JSA claim from their computer and if they cannot see any reason for it not being in payment, they will contact JSA. They might not tell you they are doing this, they will just say they are going to make their decision and either pop you on hold or ring you back.

 

Once JSA have all the details they require to process your claim, the AACT (Actual Average Clearance time) used to be 11 and a half days, however this can vary greatly depending on how many claims they have. This is how long it should take to process a claim but bear in mind that with the recession in full swing there will be a lot more claims than usual and they won't have any more staff employed to deal with them so the clearance time may well have changed and also although the clearance time is there, reality can be very different. The AACT is based on working days, not calendar days. See the link, from May 09 Jobseeker's Allowance: 21 May 2009: Written answers and statements (TheyWorkForYou.com)

 

When did you claim housing benefit and council tax benefit? The AACT for housing benefit is 14 working days, but again in reality this can take longer. If you have provided them with all the information they require to make their decision and 14 working days have passed, and you are renting privately you have a right to have a reasonable sum of housing benefit paid, based on an estimate of your entitlement. They can only refuse to do this if you refuse to provide them with the information they require, the AACT has not passed or it is obvious that you would not be entitled to Housing Benefit.

Edited by ErikaPNP

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also i have spoke to the council and they say it will take four weeks from now to process my claim for housing benefit. This is all well and good but considering i left my job on the 2nd June it will have been eight weeks before i get a penny to pay for my rent.

 

When did you claim housing benefit and council tax benefit? The AACT for housing benefit is 14 working days, but again in reality this can take longer. If you have provided them with all the information they require to make their decision and 14 working days have passed, and you are renting privately you have a right to have a reasonable sum of housing benefit paid, based on an estimate of your entitlement. They can only refuse to do this if you refuse to provide them with the information they require, the AACT has not passed or it is obvious that you would not be entitled to Housing Benefit.

 

The AACT of 14 days (not working days) starts from when the LA (Local Authority) has received al relevant documentation. This is set in statute under The Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 s89 which states

 

Decisions by a relevant authority

89.—(1) Unless provided otherwise by these Regulations, any matter required to be determined under these Regulations shall be determined in the first instance by the relevant authority.

 

(2) The relevant authority shall make a decision on each claim within 14 days of the provisions of regulations 83 and 86 being satisfied or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter.

 

(3) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions of this regulation, in a case where a person—

 

  • (a) made the notification specified in paragraph 2 of Schedule 7 within 14 days from the day immediately after the day on which his entitlement to income support or an income-based jobseeker's allowance ceased ("the appropriate day") and is treated as having claimed an extended payment under regulation 72(2); and
     
    (b) has made a claim, which meets the requirements of regulation 83(1), (6) and (9), within 14 days of the appropriate day,
     

the relevant authority shall give priority to that claim over other claims which do not fall within the provisions of this paragraph.

 

You have a period of one month in which to provide the evidence required, as per regulation 86(1)

 

Evidence and information

86. —(1) Subject to paragraph (2) and to paragraph 5 of Schedule A1[176] (treatment of claims for housing benefit by refugees), a person who makes a claim, or a person to whom housing benefit has been awarded, shall furnish such certificates, documents, information and evidence in connection with the claim or the award, or any question arising out of the claim or the award, as may reasonably be required by the relevant authority in order to determine that person's entitlement to, or continuing entitlement to, housing benefit and shall do so within one month of being required to do so or such longer period as the relevant authority may consider reasonable.

 

Furthermore, if the 14 day period has expeired and the LA has not made a decision then a payment on account should be made, the LA is required to make this payment without request from yourself. The payment on account is stipulated under regulation 93 (1) to 93 (3)

 

Payment on account of a rent allowance

93.
—(1) Where it is impracticable for the relevant authority to make a decision on a claim for a rent allowance within 14 days of the claim for it having been made and that impracticability does not arise out of the failure of the claimant, without good cause, to furnish such information, certificates, documents or evidence as the authority reasonably requires and has requested or which has been requested by the Secretary of State, the authority shall make a payment on account of any entitlement to a rent allowance of such amount as it considers reasonable having regard to—

(a) such information which may at the time be available to it concerning the claimant's circumstances; and

(b) any relevant determination made by a rent officer in exercise of the Housing Act functions.

(2) The notice of award of any payment on account of a rent allowance made under paragraph (1) shall contain a notice to the effect that if on the subsequent decision of the claim the person is not entitled to a rent allowance, or is entitled to an amount of rent allowance less than the amount of the payment on account, the whole of the amount paid on account or the excess of that amount over the entitlement to an allowance, as the case may be, will be recoverable from the person to whom the payment on account was made.

 

(3) Where on the basis of the subsequent decision the amount of rent allowance payable differs from the amount paid on account under paragraph (1), future payments of rent allowance shall be increased or reduced to take account of any underpayment or, as the case may be, overpayment.

 

All too often LA benefit staff will try and tell you that they can take anywhere between 2 weeks and 6 weeks to process a claim, this comes from a lack of understanding of the regulations in many cases.

 

If you have received the notification of your JSA, or as soon as you receive it, take the notification to your LA. JCP will notify the LA of your entitlement to benefit but this can take up to 4 weeks to be processed by the LA. (This is based on my experience of notifications)

 

You may find these useful:

 

RR2 - A guide to Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (October 2006)

 

The Housing Benefit Regulations 2006

The Council Tax Benefit Regulations 2006

 

 

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The AACT of 14 days (not working days) starts from when the LA (Local Authority) has received al relevant documentation. This is set in statute under The Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 s89 which states

 

Decisions by a relevant authority

89.—(1) Unless provided otherwise by these Regulations, any matter required to be determined under these Regulations shall be determined in the first instance by the relevant authority.

 

(2) The relevant authority shall make a decision on each claim within 14 days of the provisions of regulations 83 and 86 being satisfied or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter.

 

(3) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions of this regulation, in a case where a person—

 

  • (a) made the notification specified in paragraph 2 of Schedule 7 within 14 days from the day immediately after the day on which his entitlement to income support or an income-based jobseeker's allowance ceased ("the appropriate day") and is treated as having claimed an extended payment under regulation 72(2); and
     
    (b) has made a claim, which meets the requirements of regulation 83(1), (6) and (9), within 14 days of the appropriate day,
     

the relevant authority shall give priority to that claim over other claims which do not fall within the provisions of this paragraph.

 

You have a period of one month in which to provide the evidence required, as per regulation 86(1)

 

Evidence and information

86. —(1) Subject to paragraph (2) and to paragraph 5 of Schedule A1[176] (treatment of claims for housing benefit by refugees), a person who makes a claim, or a person to whom housing benefit has been awarded, shall furnish such certificates, documents, information and evidence in connection with the claim or the award, or any question arising out of the claim or the award, as may reasonably be required by the relevant authority in order to determine that person's entitlement to, or continuing entitlement to, housing benefit and shall do so within one month of being required to do so or such longer period as the relevant authority may consider reasonable.

 

Furthermore, if the 14 day period has expeired and the LA has not made a decision then a payment on account should be made, the LA is required to make this payment without request from yourself. The payment on account is stipulated under regulation 93 (1) to 93 (3)

 

Payment on account of a rent allowance

93.
—(1) Where it is impracticable for the relevant authority to make a decision on a claim for a rent allowance within 14 days of the claim for it having been made and that impracticability does not arise out of the failure of the claimant, without good cause, to furnish such information, certificates, documents or evidence as the authority reasonably requires and has requested or which has been requested by the Secretary of State, the authority shall make a payment on account of any entitlement to a rent allowance of such amount as it considers reasonable having regard to—

(a) such information which may at the time be available to it concerning the claimant's circumstances; and

(b) any relevant determination made by a rent officer in exercise of the Housing Act functions.

(2) The notice of award of any payment on account of a rent allowance made under paragraph (1) shall contain a notice to the effect that if on the subsequent decision of the claim the person is not entitled to a rent allowance, or is entitled to an amount of rent allowance less than the amount of the payment on account, the whole of the amount paid on account or the excess of that amount over the entitlement to an allowance, as the case may be, will be recoverable from the person to whom the payment on account was made.

 

(3) Where on the basis of the subsequent decision the amount of rent allowance payable differs from the amount paid on account under paragraph (1), future payments of rent allowance shall be increased or reduced to take account of any underpayment or, as the case may be, overpayment.

 

All too often LA benefit staff will try and tell you that they can take anywhere between 2 weeks and 6 weeks to process a claim, this comes from a lack of understanding of the regulations in many cases.

 

If you have received the notification of your JSA, or as soon as you receive it, take the notification to your LA. JCP will notify the LA of your entitlement to benefit but this can take up to 4 weeks to be processed by the LA. (This is based on my experience of notifications)

 

You may find these useful:

 

RR2 - A guide to Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (October 2006)

 

The Housing Benefit Regulations 2006

The Council Tax Benefit Regulations 2006

 

 

Thank you for clarifying that the 14 days are calendar. I know with DWP it's busniess days, and wrongly assumed HB was the same!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks alot in clearing some of the issues for me. I just need clarification on the housing benefit if it's possible. My JSA claim has now gone through so does that mean the council now have 14 calendar days to start paying me housing benefit. Also would this be back dated to the 2nd June because if it's not i would be a month behind on my rent with no way of paying it. I hope you can understand what i mean as i'm not great with writing things down.

Again thanks for taking the time to read and reply to my thread.

Andy

Andy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy. The 14 days begin from when they have all the information they require to process the claim. In regard to back dating, I'm not entirely sure how that would work as I'm not savvy on Housing Benefit. I know that with DWP benefits they only backdate to the date you claimed, but not sure on how it would work with housing benefit as they are administered by different bodies.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also would this be back dated to the 2nd June because if it's not i would be a month behind on my rent with no way of paying it. I hope you can understand what i mean as i'm not great with writing things down.

Again thanks for taking the time to read and reply to my thread.

Andy

 

For HB/CTB purposes, the backdating would be to 8th June. This is because the benefit week runs from Monday to Sunday and HB/CTB claims are treated as made the Monday following the receipt of the claim form. In terms of payment, although you will have missed out on the period 02/06 to 07/08, you will in effect get this back at the end of the claim.

 

Backdating and start of claim are covered by HB regulations 83(5) and 76 respectively.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Erika and Installspark. Installspark when you say i will get it at the end of the claim what does this mean? Does it mean i will be a month behind in my rent then? If so then is their any other people i can go to for an 'emergency payment' as such to clear my outstanding rent owed? Sorry for not understanding properly but not used to being in this situation. Thanks again for helping out

Andy...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, your entitlement for HB will be from 02/06, but will not be in payment until the following benefit week beginning 08/06. This shortfall of days is added to the end of the claim, the end of a benefit claim is the end of the benefit week following the change in circumstances. HB is normally paid in arrears.

 

You will receive a HB payment backdated to 08/06 once the claim has been processed.

 

For example, HB decision made on 01/07: You will receive a payment for the period 08/06 to 28/06. You end your HB claim 10/07 but will be paid until 19/07.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for taking the time to read and help me it is very much appreciated.

 

Even for those who are trained in benefits it can be a minefield at times; if it helps others then a few minutes of my time trying to provide clarification on benefits after/before going to work is time very well spent.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...