Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Changes in the US are enticing more people to file bankruptcy to clear their student loans.View the full article
    • Servicing Stop Limited Registered Office Address: 57 London Rd, Enfield, Middlesex, England, EN2 6DU Company Type: Private Limited Company Company Status: Active Company Number: 06558606 Directors: Oliver Joseph Richmond Appointed 8th April 2008, Toby Robert Richmond Appointed 8th September 2009 Companies House Link: SERVICING STOP LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK SERVICING STOP LIMITED - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual...   Endole Link: Servicing Stop Limited - Company Profile - Endole SUITE.ENDOLE.CO.UK Servicing Stop Limited is an active company located in Enfield, Greater London. View Servicing Stop Limited profile, shareholders, contacts...  
    • Hi I assume the Loft Conversion with the eaves and crawl space was there when you initially purchased the property. Even in done after purchasing the property and the correct permissions were in place i.e. Local Authority, Land Registry, Freeholder which is Southern Land which would be required as a Leasehold property. The difficulty is if the Loft Conversion was there when you purchased the property and there is no evidence in your documents of the eaves and crawl space due to where the Red Lines stop in the plans or even after purchase it was added this is the reason you are having issues with selling due to those missing Red Lines in the Plans and any other Buyers competent Solicitor would flag this up. I can understand the reasons the Buyer wishes a Deed of Variation probably there Solicitor requesting this to ensure those missing red lines are covered before the Sale as they Flagged this as an issue as Red Lines missing on Plans and want buyer protected. As for the £8000 costs Together and cohort Southern Land are trying to charge have you thought of contacting a few Property Solicitors yourself to get a few quotes. (only mention this because when I research this possible costs can range from £500 - £2000 depending on the Deed of Variation work required and nothing to stop you doing this then approaching Together and cohorts with it) Also ask Together/Southern Land for a breakdown of the £8000 costs for the Deed of Variation. Yup do send both Together and Southern Land a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that data in whether it be emails, written, recorded calls etc. They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond and that time limit only starts once they acknowledge receipt of your SAR Request. When you purchased the property some 17yrs ago are the Solicitors that you went through at that time still operating? (I know probably a silly question but if they are nothing to stop you contacting them and asking them about this especially if the Loft Conversion was in place when you purchased the property) Another link that will be useful to you as Leasehold is The Leasehold Advisory Service: Home - The Leasehold Advisory Service WWW.LEASE-ADVICE.ORG Government funded, independent advice for residential leaseholders and park home residents  
    • Why struggling parents aren't choosing cheaper brands when it comes to infant formula milk.View the full article
    • Musk's profane attack on advertisers baffled experts - without adverts, how would X survive?View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

Recieved county court claim form with MY NAME as both claiment and Defendent advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5276 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just recieved a claim form from northampton county court bulk centre

 

now i am named as both the Claimant AND the Defendent

it is for a paypal transcation that was disputed by the seller claiming he didnt recieve payment so in theory i am the defendent

 

 

What should i Do please will it be thrown out when the mistake he has put is realised

 

Thanks in Advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

My initial thought is that it is an abuse of process, and wouldn't make it past a judge whatsoever.....but i'm not sure as to the defence...i'd certainly DEFEND ALL if it was me....

Link to post
Share on other sites

what sort of defence would you put accross?

"i have never had any financial dealings with myself" lol

no my concern is that seeing as my name and address is on BOTH claimant and defendant how do i find out WHO sent it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha how can you defend... if you send it back the courts will send it straight back to you as the claimant :-D :-D

 

Unless he put a covering letter in with the N1 form how will the courts know how to contact whoever?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give them a call.

 

Let them know that you are named as both.

 

They may charge the claimaint to have them change as they are at fault for putting you as claimant/defendant.

 

If tehy dont pay, they may throw it out.

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give them a call.

 

Let them know that you are named as both.

 

They may charge the claimaint to have them change as they are at fault for putting you as claimant/defendant.

 

If tehy dont pay, they may throw it out.

 

To change the claimant I believe will require an application to court if the defendant doesnt agree to the change :-D

 

£75 for an N244 is the going rate I believe :-D

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive just spoken to the court and they say they dont have any other information on who the original claimant is other than i am named as both

 

they told me to dispute the full amount saying i know nothing about it and then it will probably be reissued by the claimant

 

but how will they know if the courts dont have any details on who they are?

 

im like a dog chasing my own tail lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dispute the amount, but in the letter state you are disputing because you dont recall not paying yourself back (you get my drift)

 

They will have details, I registered an online claim before and i had to give my email address, so they must have his, they just need to dig a little.

 

Thing is, im just wondering, if you dispute it, wont the court send you the letter sainy the defendant is disputing?

 

and the same vice versa, Rather ammusing in a way, but i can imagine the stress to come

Train hard...Fight easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...