Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Funding Corporation Small Claim Summons - joint loan - backdoor decree against OH - mine was dismissed - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Monty, Should it be the court or Funding Corporation that should forward the paperwork on to me, also any idea what I should say to the Judge re The Statement of Needs (not sure how to word it)

 

 

Cheers xxx

 

Hi pinky

 

It depends. An IA will come via the court but your requested paperwork should come from the funding corporation. I have had the same problem with mine and I see it with other cases, the Pursuers fail to follow up. Hence you need to point this out at your next calling date to the Sheriff when you are allowed to present. The Statement of Needs is important and you need to point out that this is a requirement for evaluating your suitability for PPI, you will have to dig around for whatever legislation or guidelines were current at the time.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well back at court on Tuesday for the 3rd time, still no paperwork received re the I/A served, also does anyone know if a Statement of Needs was mandatory in 2004 as they have said that they do not need to produce this piece of paperwork.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

And Me Again Pinky

 

Did You Find Out Who The Ppi Payments Went To

 

What Insurance Company

Who Underwrites The Policy

 

did You Get A Statement Of Price

thats A Break Down Of The Premiums

 

Its How Much In Total With Interst You Will Pay For The Insurance

 

Its Important And A Legal Requirement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help, back on the 6th October, the insurance company was AXA.

 

What should I do on Tuesday if they want another extention, and don't produve what i've asked for?

 

Thanks so much again would have thrown the towel in ages ago if it hadn't been for all the help and support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone Axa And Just Ask What Details They Have On You

 

If They Confirm Details And I Mean If

 

Ask Them To Send You All Details Including The Underwriting Sheet

 

Leave This With Me Over The Week End And Ill Take The Greates Of Pleasure In Doing A Letter For You To Take To Court

 

The Cracks Are Starting To Show And You Have Them On The Back Foot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help, back at court tomorrow just wondering if you could give me help on to approach and word the fact that the Statement of Needs cannot be produced, and if they still have not produced everything on the I/A.

 

 

Thanks xxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

have they supplied anything at all for your IA?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it could go two ways

 

 

..if they turn up tomorrow wth docs then you need to ask for an extension to check the docs and prepare a suitable defence and to check everything they have supplied

 

if they don't turn up or turn up without docs you can ask for a dismissal for not complying with the IA but they might show up and ask for another extension.

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

this can be frustrating asking for extensions etc

 

have a read of rrfc's thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dealing-debt-scotland/180427-rrfcfan-court-wf-all-4.html

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

likely i'm afraid . i think rrfc had three or four

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

there seems to be a lot more flexability in the scottish system

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am not sure i can't find it in writing to sa they haveto keep the statements or eligability and was waiting on postgg posting it up

 

just posting this up as it explains things easy for folks like me

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/other/ppi_thematic_report.pdf

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well just back from court (AGAIN), the judge was taking no nonsense she has given F/C 2 weeks to get all paperwork together for me to submit my full defence, the legal rep for F/C has said they can only supply the credit agreement and terms and conditions and that they cannot locate some of the paperwork and that some they are not obliged to supply, I did state that this being my 3rd visit that I had received nothing, the judge did not seem to be pleased about this and added that she was unwilling to keep giving F/C extension after extension, intrestingly though at the tail end the legal rep stated that the F/C may wish to come to an understanding.

 

 

ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well just back from court (AGAIN), the judge was taking no nonsense she has given F/C 2 weeks to get all paperwork together for me to submit my full defence, the legal rep for F/C has said they can only supply the credit agreement and terms and conditions and that they cannot locate some of the paperwork and that some they are not obliged to supply, I did state that this being my 3rd visit that I had received nothing, the judge did not seem to be pleased about this and added that she was unwilling to keep giving F/C extension after extension, intrestingly though at the tail end the legal rep stated that the F/C may wish to come to an understanding.

 

 

ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Well done Pinky. They know that they are stuffed, any agreement should be on strict terms that they write off the alleged debt and remove the -ve markers and DN from your CRA files.

 

The bit about not needing the actual agreement is of course rubbish, not only do they need it but it also needs to be in the prescribed terms. They also need to refund your PPI.

 

You are in a strong, winning position so don't blink.

Link to post
Share on other sites

def a winning position

 

when creditors are more interested in commission than following corect procedure, i have no sympathy

 

statement of needs and needs and demands statements are starting to haunt them now

 

tough

 

wait for the surender letter now me thinks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I STILL DON'T GET HOW THEY CAN SAY, WE CAN ONLY PRODUCE CCA AND TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND SAY THAT THE OTHER DOCS (SATEMENT OF NEEDS, DEFAULT NOTICE ETC CANNOT BE PRODUCED OR DO NOT NEED TO PRODUCE), WHAT HAPPENS IF THEY DON'T PRODUCE EVERYTHING LISTED ON THE I/A??????

 

 

Thanks again for all the supportxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would think the fc have wasted enough time and are clutching at straws

 

the judge will now throw this out and the fc now realise this

 

as usual the fc are talking crap

 

they can say no to you

 

not to a judge

 

you are in the final straight now

Link to post
Share on other sites

I STILL DON'T GET HOW THEY CAN SAY, WE CAN ONLY PRODUCE CCA AND TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND SAY THAT THE OTHER DOCS (SATEMENT OF NEEDS, DEFAULT NOTICE ETC CANNOT BE PRODUCED OR DO NOT NEED TO PRODUCE), WHAT HAPPENS IF THEY DON'T PRODUCE EVERYTHING LISTED ON THE I/A??????

 

 

Thanks again for all the supportxxxxxxxxxx

 

Dear Pinky

 

Remember where your case is in the legal process, there has been no leading of evidence, indeed they have not produced any evidence so at the moment you are well ahead. The Sheriff will not give them more opportunity but you must remember that there is a lot of flexibility in the system which seems unfair but it works both ways.

 

When, or should I say IF, evidence is led then you point to your IA and your request for documentation, that should be enough for the case to be struck out and the case awarded in your favour.

 

When does the case next call at court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...