Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

robbers way help needed - vanquis card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

so in your opinion this document they have sent me isnt proof ive had credit? thanks for all the information guys and ty for looking at the document and giving your opinion..if robinson way call me again i will screamm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

so in your opinion this document they have sent me isnt proof ive had credit? thanks for all the information guys and ty for looking at the document and giving your opinion..if robinson way call me again i will screamm

I have blown the application up and cannot see any prescribed terms, so just an application.

 

If when you get the origonal in the post, it has the terms on the back, then that could be a different matter.

 

When you receive the origonal:lol: in the post, we can all look again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ty very much lickthewallfatboy xxx i really appreciate your advise on this . robinson way are giving me a big headach at the moment its not about me not wanting to pay its the amount thats making me so mad... the debt they are talking about is a credit card debt with vanquis the limit on this card was 200 pounds now robbers way want £1,151,78 which to me is daylight robbery and to be honest hell will freeze over before i pay interest that huge...

Link to post
Share on other sites

just had another call from robinson way muppets yet again asking for payment...i saked why they are phoning me again askin for cash when the accounts in dispute as im still waiting for the original credit agreement .she inisted its been sent i told her thats an application not a true copy..she says thats got my signature on and is good enough then in an annoying voice said will you be paying that by credit card madam..i wont give you my reply as its too blue for this site lol....i then asked her to point out on the application to me where the terms and conditions are lol and said they have no agreement with me and they can take me to court. im confused now as robinson way say i owe the money to cabot? i replied the original creditor is vanquis? she told me vanquis is cabot..so im confused robinson way cabot and vanquis are all the same firm? ps never knew winding robbers way up could be such fun

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, keep all written communication from them, and copies of any letters that you send. Always send letters by recorded delivery, and never speak to them on the phone (unless you want to bait them :D ).

 

You have already discovered, when they speak on the phone they lie :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i received a letter from robinson way today .....Dear miss xxxx Due to cabot Financial (Europe)LIMITED.we refer to the above accountwhich will be managed no longer by this office.All future payments and correspondence must be sent to our client.directly.if you were paying us by standing order.please cancel that instruction and set up a new standing order to pay our client, ? i phoned this morning and was told cabot were now holding my account.i reminded them that the account was in dispute and they shouldnt be sending the account elsewhere ,,anyone to advise me on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapbot had the account, passed it on to Robbers Way, Robbers Way got nowhere with you so passed it back to Crapbot.

 

Simples tch! :D

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop talking to these idiots on the phone there job is to frighten you into paying... if it is an application form then thats all it is and is unenforceable

deal only by letter, much better and gives you a paper trail if you do need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have an application form without prescribed terms on it then why waste your time, effort and paper. Robbers Way have been at me for about 18 months with a single side of A$ that they say is an agreement and in reality it has my signature on and nothing else.

 

If you write they write back. Just ignore everything that concerns this account unless they take you to court where you will be able to get costs from them.

 

It really isn't worth playing. If they were going to admit it wasn't an agreement they would have done it first time round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think the County Court would look too kindly on all that interest ;)

Good point on interest. Vanquis and Provident (of doorstep lender fame) are the same company. The max level of interest is I understand 40% in this country and vanquis nearly charge this. Some say it's higher on cash advances. It would need to come before a judge though to be ruled as an unlawfull interest rate. 183% is what I pay Provident and their CCA's are flawless except for the unlawfull interest rate that no judge would sanction.

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...