Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anatomy of a Default Notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4587 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 541
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Subbing to this thread as I have not received any responses really under CAP1 section and I really need some advice please.

 

I am seeking advice on Default Notices, this is my second in two days and whilst I have been reading and reading threads on Dn's I would appreciate some guidance and advice regarding this one from Cap1.

 

Brief history - sent CCA request, received letter back saying they can't action without a signaturelink3.gif, I wrote back saying I'm not obliged to provide one please carry out CCA request as required, they wrote back to say it would take them sometime to deal with my enquiry and would be in touch if they hadn't managed to oblige within 4 weeks :shock: I wrote back after the 12 + 2 days from second CCA request with Account in Dispute Letter. They received this on 13 July, I have POD from RM.

 

Today I receive the following;

http://i892.photobucket.com/albums/a...ltlet001-1.jpg

 

I am in a dmplink3.gif with payplan, early stages, but have not received any notification of a Long Term Payment Plan with CAP1, from either CAP1 or PP.

 

 

http://i892.photobucket.com/albums/a...tnotice003.jpg

 

My questions are;

1) Is there a letter template to reject a DN issued whilst account in Dispute?

2) Irrespective of whether the DN should have been issued does it meet the prescribed requirements?

3) Anyone else received this format from CAP1?

4) What should I do now:confused::confused:

 

Thank you

 

FF

Edited by fossilfinder
wrong link to DN new one entered in post below.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, well that’s what they look like!. Crap One said they have send us similar one, which I doubt but they did enter Defaults on our credit files.

 

Expert advice is needed but there is some serious breeches here. They basically states that you shouldn’t go into a Debt Management Program!! Isn’t that against the law!!

 

It is any way invalid:

No date, it gives 28 days!

There is also not a date of issue on the DN itself!

 

The remedy: Cancel your DMP or we will ask the whole amount, sell it to a DCA, etc.!!

 

I think they are in some serious breeches here!!!

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

FF

 

You have to remove the barcode! They can read it and pull up your file!

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

A date specified must be a specified date within the notice itself...not ''from 28 days from the date on the letter''...also a copy of the current default information must be supplied with the DN in accordance vwith s86A

Edited by means2anend
Link to post
Share on other sites

A date specified must be a specified date within the notice itself...not ''from 28 days from the date on the letter''

 

The DN is a document on its own and must state the date when issued, they cannot use the data on the accompany letter.

 

They do print these in bulk from templates and do not keep a copy, if you "loose" the first page, what is the date then anyway?

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

FF here is the link that will explain the ''anatomy of a default notice''...

meanwhile I'll refresh my memory and go through it with you by applying it to crap1's actual frankenstein creation.

 

http://uk.wrs.yahoo.com/_ylt=A1f4cfkeA0dMGEwBldxLBQx.;_ylu=X3oDMTE0NGZvc29oBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2lyZAR2dGlkA1VLQzAwMl8xMw--/SIG=15an6ft4u/EXP=1279808670/**http%3a//www.johnpughschambers.co.uk/Consumer%2520Credit%2520(Enforcement,%2520Default%2520and%2520Termination%2520Notices)%2520Regulations%25201983.pdf

 

rgds

m2ae

Link to post
Share on other sites

READ THIS BEFORE YOU READ SCHEDULE 2...this is on Page 1 ...Section 2(2)

 

I put it here for convenience;

SECTION 2

(2) Any notice to be given by a creditor or owner in relation to a regulated agreement to a debtor or hirer under section 87(1) of the Act (which relates to the necessity to serve a default notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 before taking certain action by reason of any breach of the agreement by the debtor or hirer) shall contain--

(a) a statement that the notice is a default notice served under section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;

(b) the information set out in paragraphs 1 to 3, 6 and 8 of Schedule 2 to these Regulations; and

© statements in the form specified in paragraphs 4, 5, 7[, 8A] and 9 to 11 of that Schedule.

 

 

In the link above look specifically to Page 4 and Schedule 2 paragraphs 1-3,6 and 8 of SCHEDULE 2...and check out statements in as mentioned in © in that same Schedule...

 

The required information in your Crap1 is dictated by that Schedule...

 

I think you should try reading it first then look at your DN...any questions THEN post we'll get back to you..in meantime it's a while since I read it so it'll give me time too to absorb refresh and answer any questions you may have...One interesting point to note is that they call your notice not a DEFAULT NOTICE but NOTICE OF DEFAULT...in law these 2 creatures are entirely different and have differing purposes....the reqwuirement above in (a) is that it shall be stated as a default notice

 

rgds

 

m2ae

Edited by means2anend
Link to post
Share on other sites

In paragraph 3 to Schedule 2 it explicitly states

 

3 A specification of:--

(a) the provision of the agreement alleged to have been breached; and

(b) the nature of the alleged breach of the agreement, specifying clearly the matters complained of; and either

© if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it and the date, being a date [not less than

fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which that action is to be taken; or

(d) if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be paid as compensation for the breach and

the date, being a date [not less than fourteen days] after the date of service of the notice, before which it is to be paid

 

rgds

 

m2ae

user_online.gifreputation.gif report.gif progress.gifedit.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your comments,

 

LPT I have now removed the barcode, will post DN back up in aminute, it keeps linking to the old version with barcode!!

 

Thank you for your comments.

 

m2ae - thank you also for your advise and links, I appreciate it. I will go and read through the schedule again, I have to admit to getting a little confused with the way these things are written, however there do seem to be a number of glaring errors with their 'Notice to Default' as you correctly pointed out!

 

I could always refer to section 16 of my Credit Agreement as this is what they say I have breached - Oh No Hang on - They haven't sent me a CA :rolleyes:!

 

Thanks, I will wait and see what happens next.

 

LTP how are you getting on since they logged Defaults against you?

 

Regrds

 

FF

Edited by fossilfinder
Link to post
Share on other sites

FF

 

It also appears as though this mandatory statement is missing at the appropriate place

 

This statement shall follow the specification under paragraph 3© or (d) of any action required to be taken.

 

''Consequences of failure to comply with default notice''

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, have deleted duplicate file and replaced with new on

 

DN they sent me in case anyone else wanted to comment or see what one looks like, if like LPT, you have been told by CAP1 that they sent you one but it never materilaised;)

 

http://i892.photobucket.com/albums/ac128/fossilfinder/capdefaultnotice004.jpg

 

I am off to disect the information you sent m2ae,

 

FF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, have deleted duplicate file and replaced with new on

 

DN they sent me in case anyone else wanted to comment or see what one looks like, if like LPT, you have been told by CAP1 that they sent you one but it never materilaised;)

 

http://i892.photobucket.com/albums/ac128/fossilfinder/capdefaultnotice004.jpg

 

I am off to disect the information you sent m2ae,

 

FF

 

 

FF..no I meant that I HAVE deleted my post because i had duplicated it..I did not ask you to duplicate anything...getting a bit like benny hill:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just point out that the date issue has been gone over time and again, and I think it's highly unlikely that a judge will not just ignore the fact that it says 28 days instead of giving a date.

 

I know the Act specifies 'date' etc, and I know that to the letter of the Act it should be invalid if there is not a date, but can you honestly see yourself trying to argue that 28 days is not enough time to remedy, date or no date? All a judge will see is that the notice gave 14 days and then some, as required. How are you going to argue that it did not give enough time when you have an extra two weeks?

 

Granted this is not right and it could be abused in all manner of ways, which is precisely why the Act states a date and not just a number of days. I would lay odds on this not being an issue to them though.

 

The fact there isn't a date on the notice is possibly a little more problematic for them as it's right that there should be one there on the notice itself. Again though I doubt this would on its own be enough to cause them consternation as they'd just get x employee to swear they are all sent with a covering letter bearing the date. In addition to that they will likely have records of when it was sent on their files, and as we all know it's deemed served after x days (depending on what class post was used) in the ordinary course of the post.

 

Cap1's notices are decidedly dodgy (I have one myself), but they are unfortunately not as clear cut as 'they haven't put a date so they're screwed'.

 

If there are other issues I've not seen them as the link just seems to go to Photobucket's front page.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lexis200,

 

Thanks for your comments, I agree with you point about enough time, I'm just trying to wise up re DN. Even if they gave me a 100 days I wouldn't be able to remedy the situation! My inital question was Cap1 sent this after I issued the Account in Dispute letter as they hadn't complied with my CCA request.

 

Any pointers as what to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lexis200,

 

Thanks for your comments, I agree with you point about enough time, I'm just trying to wise up re DN. Even if they gave me a 100 days I wouldn't be able to remedy the situation!Snap:) My inital question was Cap1 sent this after I issued the Account in Dispute letter as they hadn't complied with my CCA request. Sounds about right:rolleyes: They don't pay a blind bit of notice to accounts being in dispute - they just claim they're not! They also won't agree that a DN amounts to enforcement so they nullify that argument very quickly (from their point of view anyway).

 

Any pointers as what to do next?

 

All I can say is that my own personal experience is that I have got precisely nowhere with the complaints I've sent about this exact matter. Have you tried the FOS, and the OFT (considering it's their guidelines that they are breaching)? It's a long(ish) shot but they may be helpful...

 

It's always but always worth plugging away, if for no other reason than to make yourself look utterly reasonable in your actions whilst they have been utter tools.

 

As I'm not willing to go to court (that's really not somewhere I want to be), I've just kind of ignored them for a while now. They sent Fredricksons after me in January this year and I wrote and told them to burger off. I got a reply yesterday regarding my 'recent' letter and asking me to contact them by phone. Silly billies:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your comments,

 

LPT I have now removed the barcode, will post DN back up in aminute, it keeps linking to the old version with barcode!!

 

LTP how are you getting on since they logged Defaults against you?

 

Regrds

 

FF

 

The one with the bar code is gone.

 

We have 2 defaults, one on my name and the other in my wives name.

 

I did complain to them a while ago (before I learned something about it, it was actually that default that made me to search for defaults and I ended up here) about mine and will post their daft response tomorrow.

 

In my wives case I made a SAR and I must now decide whether to take Sven Lagerberg to court or to complain to the ICO because he didn't comply and the 40 days are over. He said he need a signature, I said it is not needed, then I send him the 7 days before action letter in the beginning of last week. He didn't respond to either.

 

I am glad to see the actual default notice because I didn't know what it contains. Now I know. My current strategy is to get the information regarding the SAR to see what I can do. I did send the Unlawful Rescission letter for closing the account without a valid default notice.

 

I want to attack them on this basis (the invalid DN is just a bonus, I believe it is clear that they SHOULD NOT file a Default under these conditions):

The important part here is also the ICO guidance regarding filing defaults with credit reference agencies:

17 Variations in payment schedules – Keeping the record up to date

Lenders should not file a default where there is a genuine and agreed variation in the payment schedule. (The only exception to this is where a debt management programme is put in place where the level is of payment represents only a token sum which is only accepted by the lender because the customer cannot afford to pay more. The reporting of debt management plans is discussed at paragraphs 22-26). …….

 

23 Moderate to high levels of repayment

If the payment set out in the DMP is at a level that a lender considers at least adequate, the agreement should be marked as included in a DMP. A lender may be willing to reschedule the agreement at a later stage at which point the record should be changed to reflect the agreed scheduling.

 

25 Where a customer does not make the repayment agreed under the DMP, a default can be recorded and the DMP marker should be removed when the total value of the arrears is equivalent to three monthly payments under the original terms.

 

It stated much more info and the message is clear, they should only file defaults when there are arrears and when these arrears are at least for 3 months.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Removed the DN - needs editing!

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the DN.

BH-DN.pdf

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

LTP how are you getting on since they logged Defaults against you?

 

This is a response I received back in 2009 - it is crap, even from crapone.

 

I will send them another letter quoting the guidelines from the ICO. I expect another crap letter which I will use to complain to the ICO.

 

I did receive complaint forms from the fos, which I never returned because they seems to say it is a legal isue and they can do nothing about it. I think I will return it just for the reason that it will cost CrapOne between £400 and £500 for the fos just to investigate it, no matter the outcome, that for a balance of £191.00 on the card!

 

They do have these rubbish in theit t&c's, which are against the guidelines of the ICO. The ICO states very clear that should you go into a DMP and you make reasonable payments, then they should report on your credit report that you are in debt management and they should change that should to the DMP comes to an end, either you settled the account or resume original payments - not to default you.

 

THIS IS A DIFFERENT ISSUE:

Their t&c's breaking ICO guidelines. They punish you for 6 years for going into debt management.

 

Other organisations (which I had dealings with) didn't issue defaults, they adhere to ICO guidelines, what make CrapOne think they are special?

 

Anyway, my ICO complaint for their data controller who failed my SAR is going off today!

CrapOne.pdf

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a response I received back in 2009 - it is crap, even from crapone.

 

I will send them another letter quoting the guidelines from the ICO. I expect another crap letter which I will use to complain to the ICO.

 

I did receive complaint forms from the fos, which I never returned because they seems to say it is a legal isue and they can do nothing about it. I think I will return it just for the reason that it will cost CrapOne between £400 and £500 for the fos just to investigate it, no matter the outcome, that for a balance of £191.00 on the card!

 

They do have these rubbish in theit t&c's, which are against the guidelines of the ICO. The ICO states very clear that should you go into a DMP and you make reasonable payments, then they should report on your credit report that you are in debt management and they should change that should to the DMP comes to an end, either you settled the account or resume original payments - not to default you.

 

THIS IS A DIFFERENT ISSUE:

Their t&c's breaking ICO guidelines. They punish you for 6 years for going into debt management.

 

Other organisations (which I had dealings with) didn't issue defaults, they adhere to ICO guidelines, what make CrapOne think they are special?

 

Anyway, my ICO complaint for their data controller who failed my SAR is going off today!

 

That is very interesting LTP...

 

When I had to go onto a payment plan I was told by a good proportion of my creditors that I needed to be served a DN before they would consider it, or as soon as I started it. Obviously the ones before were very dodgy as I'd kept payments up until I started plans (ie no missed payments, no arrears), but I though the ones after the plan was started would have been ok as I wasn't making the minimum contractual payments (ignoring for a minute the lack of agreements with most:)).

 

Any chance you could point me to where the ICO states this please so that I can have a look?

 

Thanks:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...