Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jobs At Risk-employer Not Fair On Scoring System Of Assessments


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm new to this so please bear with me. After 25 years of working for a fairly large company, I and many colleagues were given notice last week that our jobs were at risk. The individuals affected were given an interview with our manager and personnel. We were given a copy of our jobs at risk assessment which basically shows 6 criterias for assessment eg skill, productivity, attendance(on attendance never had a day off sick or late for work. Last day off sick was over 10 years ago) etc. As I say, we were given a copy to take away, study it and go back to a second meeting. I had my second meeting this morning, note on both occasions I was accompanied with my shop steward. At this mornings meeting, my manager and personnel went over the scoring system used. Everything seemed okay until they came to skill. I was given a mark of 2 out of 5 on the matrix system as I was assessed to have 12 skills. For example 1 to 10 skills = 1 point, 11 to 20 skills = 2 points. This is then multiplied by a factor of 30, so for skill I had 2 x 30 which scores me 60. I asked what skills were listed for me and my manager read them out. I noticed that a work area in our factory that had recently been updated with new machinery, I was advised I had been given 0 points for this as I could work the old machinery I had not been properly trained on new machinery, basically new machine gives out same finished job, its just faster and produces more. On queerying this, my manager wouldnt budge on this and said he was awarding 0 points to me on this new machine, even though I had worked a very similar machine for 15 years, so I requested a further review on my skills score, he refused. I also heard before the meeting that a girl that I had trained up last year, her job was not at risk. I questioned this, she wasnt on the new machines either and I know what jobs she can do, my evaluation is she could do 7 skills which would give her 1 point x 30. My manager wouldnt discuss this girl. My shop steward then requested a copy of all employees that worked in that area, he wanted to view all assessment forms. Both my manager and personnel refused this request. My shop steward made the request once more and asked it to be minuted along with all the rest of the minutes of the meeting. He totally agrees with me that management have not done the scoring process correctly. My next meeting with my manager and personnel is next monday, where we reckon they will rubber stamp redundancies. So where do we go from here? Surely we must have some rights and why is our employer refusing our requests? I look forward to hearing any feedback on this. Many thanks for taking the time to read this. Betty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Betty

 

I'm not really sure where to go on this one - you're in a union which is great and your shop steward knows what they are talking about.

 

All I can say on this one is to wait and see what happens with the redundancy meeting and your union will take it from there if there is any issues.

 

Best Wishes

Heb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Heb,

 

Thanks for your encouraging thoughts. Having been in the union from day one, 25 years, I have never needed any serious help from them in the past, now in this difficult situation for me, where I find my employer refusing our requests and rights, there is no justice here and I am quite sure that our manager is well aware that he has not been fair in the scoring system. I can only hope that the missing part to this jigsaw can be found before monday, otherwise I'm out of work.

Again, thanks for your encouragement.

 

BETTY

Link to post
Share on other sites

Betty, I am very thin on employment law. However, one point occurs to me.

 

You say you have worked there for 25 years - therefore must be of a certain age? (Not being rude honest!)

 

Then you say "the girl" which implies she is much younger than you.

 

Ask your Union Rep about this age discrimination thing. ie., same skills, you've been there longer and are more experienced, why then does she score more highly than you? Couldn't possibly be because she's younger now, could it? ;) As I said, I know next to nothing about employment law, but I think it would be well worth getting your rep to throw this in the pot as well! If nothing else it'll cause aggro, well, they've caused you aggro haven't they?

 

I wish you luck, you must be very worried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what I cant understand, she has less skills than me but management dont put her job at risk. Concerning length of service, personnel stated that doesnt come in to it now, assessment based on skill, performance, attendance etc. Management picking and deciding here and it is grossly unfair...but where is the law on this? There must be something somewhere in the employment act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...