Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes typed it, how would I input it any other way, probably timed out took over half hour. H
    • You typed it in? actually typed it all out? if so, maybe you took too long or something, like session timed out. Does the status show defence filed or no change?
    • Hi just typed all defence clicked next and it's deleted all. Any help
    • I forgot to say, there is one last possibility and that is that they will receive your letter of rejection and simply fold, accept the rejection and refund you. Don't wait too long for this. Seven days maximum – but in that seven days you could send your letter of claim anyway and when that you don't hear from them or when they start mucking around at least you are seven days closer to beginning the legal action – and they will know it (which is the important thing).
    • Okay that is excellent that you have an email between the garage and the warranty company confirming that there is a serious problem with the gearbox. That is very powerful evidence. I think the situation is this: you have sent them a letter of rejection but the reputation of big motoring world is that they won't take a lot of notice and they will try to prevaricate and maybe even blame you. Clearly you don't want the car any more and anyway it sounds as if the cost of repairs is going to be enormous. You don't know if the warranty company is going to step up to the mark but the whole thing is going to take a long time and I understand that you have lost confidence in big motoring world because of this event and also their reputation which you are now discovering on Facebook and on this forum and no doubt elsewhere. On the basis that you don't want the car any more and you want your money back, you need to hurry things along. I think the first thing is that you need to decide if you are prepared to bring a claim in the County Court. Even without the warranty money, the claim is worth more than £10,000. For actions less than £10,000, you bring a "small claim" and this means that even if you lose the case you won't be liable for the other side's costs. If you win the case then not only will you get your money plus interest but also you will recover all of the costs of the action. For actions more than £10,000, you go to something called the "fast track" and in the event that you lose the case, then you could be liable to reimburse the winner some of the costs. This means that in addition to not recovering your own money, you would lose your own court fees and also you would have to to bear the costs of the other side probably something less than £5000 – but as a rough guess. If you bring your court claim then your chances of success are almost 100%. Frankly if you brought a court claim then I can imagine that big motoring world will put their hands up and pay you out rather than face go to court and losing and getting a judgement against them. However, it you need to consider that this is a risk factor – although my view it is a negligible risk factor. If you did bring a court case, it wouldn't be instant. If they put their hands up then it would probably happen very quickly. If they didn't put their hands up then you could take anything up to a year for the matter to be resolved and during that time you would be without your car and without your money and in the middle of litigation. I'm explaining this to you say that you understand how it works. Bring a court case would be really the last resort when everything else has failed. However, I'm quite certain that you would win and it would be stupid of big motoring world to try to resist. In order to bring a court case you would have to send a letter of claim giving them 14 days to accept rejection and organise the refund otherwise you would begin the claim. Don't imagine that you could bluff this. If you did send a letter of claim then you would have to go through with it otherwise you lose all credibility and you might as well pack up and go home. So with this in mind, here are possible courses of action you could take. You can simply wait and see what their reaction to your letter of rejection will be. However they may not reply or else they may find some other reason to delay and of course during that time you will be without your car and without your money blah blah blah, not knowing if big motoring world were going eventually to start acting sensibly and respectfully towards you. The second thing you can do – and I think this has been suggested on Facebook – is that you can go along there and simply make yourself present and talk to other customers and generally speaking make a nuisance of yourself and embarrass them to the point where you would be explaining to other potential customers to be careful, to look on Facebook, and to do some careful research before they put their business to big motoring world. This has a reasonable chance of success although you would have to be careful. You should go accompanied by a friend and there should be no anger, no arguments, nothing that could be considered as being overly aggressive so that big motoring world would have no justification in kicking you out or even worse, calling the police. If you did this, then I would suggest that you record everything on the telephone carried in a pocket. A fully charged battery will probably keep a voice recorder and a telephone going for more than 20 hours or 30 hours. The other person can video any incidents so that everything is clear and you can inform big motoring world then it will be going up on the Internet. If you did this, my favourite option would be to issue the letter of claim giving them 14 days, and then going along to big motoring world with a copy of your letter of rejection and a copy of the exchange between the mechanic and the warranty company and a copy of your letter of claim – all settled together – and probably about 20 or 30 copies in all and I would start handing them out to any customers who came in. Big motoring world will soon get the picture and they will either move your the premises in which case you stand outside and carry on doing it or they will finally give in. Of course there is a chance that they won't give in and they will simply call your bluff – but in that case I think you have no choice other than to follow through with your 14 day threat in the letter of claim and to begin the legal action. At the same time you should be putting up reviews on Google and also trust pilot explaining exactly what has happened and also explaining that the mechanic has confirmed to the warranty company that there is the serious problem, that you have asserted the right to reject and that this is been ignored by big motoring world and that you have now sent a letter of claim and that you will be starting a legal action in 14 days. Once again, don't bluff about the legal action. If you threaten it – then you must mean it – and on day 15 you click of the claim. You don't need a solicitor for any of this. It's all fairly straightforward and of course we will help you all the way that it the decision is yours to make and I think you need to make it fairly quickly. I think the cost of starting an action for about £13,000 is 5% and then also if it goes to trial which I would say is almost impossible – there would be an additional fee. You would claim interest at 8%. A judge might award a lower figure but frankly if you can show that big motoring world is attempting to ride roughshod over your very clear statutory consumer rights, I can imagine that the judge will want to show displeasure by awarding the full 8% which is a pretty good rate – even though it's not compensation for the hassle and the distress you are going through. If you decide to get solicitor, then if you win the case, because it is over £10,000 you will recover some of your costs but you won't recover all of them. If the solicitor begins by having exchanges of letters then I doubt whether you will be up to recover the cost of those and you could easily find that you're chalking up 500 quid or even a thousand simply on initial exchanges of correspondence. Also you need to bear in mind that if after having exchanges with a solicitor, big motoring world cave in – then you definitely won't get those costs back because you won't have gone to court and therefore a judge will not have made the order for payment of those costs. I suggest very strongly that you avoid paying any money for a solicitor and that you do it yourself. It's not a big deal – although you will have to you react quickly to the help we offer on this forum. Also, an additional benefit is that you will learn a lot and you will gain confidence and eventually you will feel good about suing anybody else who gets in your way. Nothing not to like! If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must take control of the solicitor. Most of them prefer to sit in an office writing letters on the clock. If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must instruct the solicitor very firmly that they should send one letter of complaint giving seven days. A second letter – a letter of claim giving 14 days and that they must then begin the action. If you don't do this. If you don't take control then it will simply cost you money, you will be without your car even longer and of course without your money. The whole thing is a nightmare. I think I've laid out the options but please do ask questions. I hope you can see that this is the kind of advice that you won't be getting on Facebook. Nothing against Facebook. It's good as a meeting place and to make people realise that they aren't on their own – but after that the advice given is weak and confusing.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ACS:Law copyright file sharing claims, Gallant Macmillan - and probably some others along the way...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4978 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Do not phone them.

 

There is a template letter of denial in this thread - it is in your interests to read the whole lot, as lots of questions have been asked and answered already.

 

In short;

 

- they have no claim against you, so you have no legal obligation to pay them

- some believe these are fishing attempts, let others pay as you don't need to

- you should send a letter of denial, then ignore any further letters unless they take Court action

- they have NOT taken action against anyone on this thread, AFAIK (EDIT: There are some saying the claims have been issued, but are not coming back with their own threads, or more information on this thread - this leads me to believe that those posts are NOT genuine)

- Complain to everyone you can think of; Trading Standards, the Solicitors Regulation Authority, your Local MP... the more people at the party, the better for you

 

Any other concerns you may have will have already been dealt with on this thread ;)

Edited by car2403

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thats why i was asking! just came across this thread and would be here for DAYS reading 49 pages!!

 

OK, post 970 sums it up nicely.

 

This company are using procedures that would be recognised by anyone who has been on the wrong end of debt collectors, that is:

 

Use an automated system that sends demands for money along with a series of dire threats that escalate as time goes on, (just as their predecessor Davenport Lyons did).

 

Sit back and wait for the money to roll in from people that don't know any better.

 

Their website talks of victories in California and Germany WHERE THE LAW IS DIFFERENT.

 

Davenport Lyons NEVER WON A DEFENDED CASE IN BRITAIN and nor will this shower for the reasons in post 970.

 

After you have sent an LOD you have two choices.

 

Ignore them

 

Tell them to F*** off.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly they are just using the standard DCA tactic of sending out a load of computer-generated letters at predetermined intervals, irrespective of whether you have corresponded with them previously. Which makes me think that it is even less likely to go anywher near a court room, as that kind of behaviour is unlikely to go down very well with judge.

 

 

When you look at it logically what would they be putting before a court?

  • We optained an IP address using a secret method, which we will not divulge, and so cannot prove that it is accurate in any way, shape, or form.
  • Even if the IP address is accurate, we cannot how that the defendant did the actual downloading, or even that any downloading took place
  • We are completely ignoring any letters of denial that we receive
  • We are claiming damages that bear no relation at all to our actual losses, and changing the amounts demaned as well

I don't think so somehow.

 

Youve put some very good points across there :).

 

I'm amazed at how long this is dragging on for, but it is also worrying that some maybe niave people have paid these scumbags, even if they are totally innocent.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi People,

 

 

I'm baffled to understand why the government is not asking ISP's to block users from downloading over p2p, for most ISP's if not all, its the single highest consumer of bandwidth in the network (if you allow it), most customers just leave their p2p applications running all day & night.

 

 

Quite simply because using P2P is not illegal, it is used for many legitimate purposes, ie..Some fanstasy wargames, swapping legitimate uncopyright songs/films and the BBC iplayer originally used P2P although I believe it now uses a different system.

 

BBC iplayer specifically is up there amongst the highest consumer of bandwidth.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew Crossley was already fined by the UK’s Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) for engaging in “conduct unbefitting a solicitor” (pdf) back in 2006. We believe that a law firm claiming to uphold copyright law on behalf of its clients but infringing copyright in the process warrants the same label, but we’ll let the Conduct Investigation Unit at the SRA decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have been reading this forum ever since I received my first letter of claim in June.

 

I am grateful to all the advice given on this site, however, I have just seen on acs-law.org.uk that the following update has been posted,

"Update: the first batch claims have been prepared and were filed at court on Friday, 4 September 2009. Service of the proceedings will be made by first class post and will be with defendants by Tuesday, 8 September 2009 at the very latest.

 

The second batch of defendants will be selected on Monday, 14 September 2009. "

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have been reading this forum ever since I received my first letter of claim in June.

 

I am grateful to all the advice given on this site, however, I have just seen on acs-law.org.uk that the following update has been posted,

"Update: the first batch claims have been prepared and were filed at court on Friday, 4 September 2009. Service of the proceedings will be made by first class post and will be with defendants by Tuesday, 8 September 2009 at the very latest.

 

The second batch of defendants will be selected on Monday, 14 September 2009. "

 

 

 

 

You'll probably find that the people they are taking to court are either the ones who have totally ignored them & they are hoping for a default judgement and/or the ones that have admitted and failed to make payment. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are doing what they are accusing their victims of doing.... using template letters. They will be going for the 'easy victims', the ones that haven't actually responded to them.

 

When they say you haven't replied to them they actually mean you have replied to them admitting the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have been reading this forum ever since I received my first letter of claim in June.

 

I am grateful to all the advice given on this site, however, I have just seen on acs-law.org.uk that the following update has been posted,

"Update: the first batch claims have been prepared and were filed at court on Friday, 4 September 2009. Service of the proceedings will be made by first class post and will be with defendants by Tuesday, 8 September 2009 at the very latest.

 

The second batch of defendants will be selected on Monday, 14 September 2009. "

 

 

Interesting...

 

If anyone does receive Court papers, please do let us know. Probably best to start a new thread in the legal issues subforum, then post a link back to it on this thread;

 

www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues

 

There's a beginners guide to CAG in my signature showing you how to start a new thread, after you've followed that link.

 

I think next week may get interesting.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too received aletter today which sent me in a right tizz. I have responded to them and denied the accusations, but they say they have not received anything from me - sent last recoded, and if I don't respond in 7 days the price goes up to £1K. Glad to see I am not alone and don't feel so isolated, I too thought it was for the court to decide on any payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it normal small claims court?

 

Surely such a court is not even remotely qualified, or skilled enough to hear a case that involves serious IT technical arguments as would be involved in these, if someone from CAG gets a letter next week?

 

Not to mention that under current british law, the "proof" they have is insufficient and provably easy to spoof. So easy, in fact that should they decide, ACS:Law themselves would have no problem leaching innocent IP addresses from around the web and then manufacturing "proof" of downloading.

 

This is hopefully one american borrowed tactic that I hope will explode in their face extremely nastily.

 

And isnt entrapment against the law?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

The track it would be allocated to, should they issue a Court claim, will depend on the amount claimed - small claims track being £5k or under - and the complexity of the claim details.

 

I suspect these will be claims for money for use of copyright material, rather than actual copyright claims.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my time away from here recently (;))....i have been doing some undercover research about ACS Law & this whole saga in general by reading round various other sites/blogs etc...

I am of the conclusion that things are not going well at all for ACS Law & that they are yet to take 1 single person to a court.

I therefore would treat these claims of what ACS are going to do with caution as their bark seems to be bigger than the bite at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I therefore would treat these claims of what ACS are going to do with caution as their bark seems to be bigger than the bite at the moment.

 

Agree with that.

 

Could be however that they will try some, (as bog standard debt collectors do), in the hope of getting further money in.

 

Statistically, the chances of an individual getting one are low. As I understand it they have been sending letters to around 6000 people. To file on everyone, (which they couldn't physically cope with anyway), would mean their clients coughing up a total around £300,000 in court fees. That's not going to happen.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

We should put them on notice that if they do actually bring any cases, we will go over them with fine tooth comb. I was very suspicious of the case where DL got a default judgment for £16000 and then crowed about it by issuing press releases to all and sundry. Let's just say that it wouldn't be difficult at all to set up a "case" to lose in order to gain the publicity value. Allegedly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a letter from ACS:LAW three months ago because i have downloaded a scooter song the fine was £500.We went to see the trading standards and they told us to leave the letter alone and forgett about it.But yesterday we received a 2nd letter demanding a payment of £500.If they do not receive the payment in 7 days the fine will go up to £1000 and we will have to go to court and pay for court cost.What do i do?We called ACS:LAW and we talked to a woman and shee told us that shee does not deal with music and she would put us to that department the number on the lette (020 71932493).An automated service said that they are either they are closed or buissy.:shock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a letter from ACS:LAW three months ago because i have downloaded a scooter song the fine was £500.We went to see the trading standards and they told us to leave the letter alone and forgett about it.But yesterday we received a 2nd letter demanding a payment of £500.If they do not receive the payment in 7 days the fine will go up to £1000 and we will have to go to court and pay for court cost.What do i do?We called ACS:LAW and we talked to a woman and shee told us that shee does not deal with music and she would put us to that department the number on the lette (020 71932493).An automated service said that they are either they are closed or buissy.:shock:

 

You need to read your way through the whole thread, I appreciate that it is very long. All the advice that you need is contained therein ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a letter from ACS:LAW three months ago because i have downloaded a scooter song the fine was £500.We went to see the trading standards and they told us to leave the letter alone and forgett about it.But yesterday we received a 2nd letter demanding a payment of £500.If they do not receive the payment in 7 days the fine will go up to £1000 and we will have to go to court and pay for court cost.What do i do?We called ACS:LAW and we talked to a woman and shee told us that shee does not deal with music and she would put us to that department the number on the lette (020 71932493).An automated service said that they are either they are closed or buissy.:shock:
yeah i got the same two letters and done exactly the same as you they can whistle for any money for something i havent done and even if any one was guilty the evidence is **** poor dont you think
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4978 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...