Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's solved Laura.  It's in the paragraph I've highlighted here in the attachment from the IAS. Plus look at page 28 of the PDF of Bank's WS.  There is written - 157 IPS 29/04/2022 12:52 29/04/2022 14:52 YE60PZA 158 IPS 29/04/2022 12:51 29/04/2022 14:51 YE60PZA - there are the two payments. One is for the elderly woman's car. One is for your son's, but with the wrong registration. When I get a second this evening I'll add the exhibits to the WS and it will be finished. IAS adjudicator's report.pdf
    • Speeding "tickets" are not like parking tickets. They cannot be appealed.  No you won't get one of them cancelled. They were two days apart and so will be treated as separate offences. If your speed was 53mph or below you will be offered a course for one of them (cost of about £100 but no points). For the other you will be offered a fixed penalty (£100 and three points). If you want to decline either of those offers the alternative is prosecution in court, where the financial penalty will be considerably higher. Make sure you respond to the "requests for driver's details" within the 28 days allowed. Failure to do so will see you commit a more serious offence which carries a hefty fine, six points, and an endorsement code which will see your insurance premiums double. Also make sure you submit your driving licence details if you accept a fixed penalty.
    • So if I've understood correctly, you had a meeting with a company who employ PPM to manage their car park, but PPM gave you a ticket and the company refuse to get it cancelled.  Eh???!!! You are being somewhat secretive with the details and it would help us to give correct advice if you would be crystal clear about the story.  Who did you have the meeting with?  What is their address?  Why do you think it was them who called in PPM?  Were you informed about the matter of the permit by this company?  Etc.
    • What a disgraceful shirking of responsibility.  Par for the course though I'm afraid with Iceland. You could get nasty and send them a version of the below (you know the local area so change what needs to be changed). Unfortunately the people who are replying are having to comply with the company policy which is being foisted on them - which is not to cancel tickets. But you might as well send the mail and try.   Dear Cissy, thank you for today's mail. Of course you are "able" to cancel the charge, you simply contact Excel and tell them to cancel the charge. I will wait for exactly 24 hours and then contact the local newspaper XXXXX and the local radio station XXXXX about Iceland's disgraceful disability discrimination.  Nothing much happens in Gravesend so I'm sure both will be happy to do a piece which will generate terrible publicity for your store and drive away customers, which is exactly what you deserve. Yours, XXXXX 
    • You are absolutely right to be cautious. It would be helpful if you will be prepared to send me a private message containing details of the outlet and the address et cetera. It might help me to get things more into perspective. So I understand that you had a business selling your husband's photographs. You were unable to continue your direct involvement and so you made an arrangement with a manager who you trusted to carry on the business for you while you were recovering elsewhere in the country. Is this correct? This manager has possession of all the files of your husband's photographs. Is this correct? Do you have any copies of the files? You made a reference to having a Co-op. Does that mean that you are running a Co-op supermarket or groceries outlet? I don't quite understand here. In terms of the possibility of continuing the arrangement with this manager – my own view is that you need to bring the arrangement to an end and I don't see how you could trust them. As far as I can see you are asking about two issues. Making sure that the files in the manager's position are destroyed so that you regain control of the photographs. Obtaining some damages for the loss of revenue. How many photographs do you believe are in his possession? What you estimate is your loss of revenue so far – probably calculated on your average revenue over, say, the five years before you stopped your involvement in the business? You are talking here not only about a breach of contract. You are talking also about breach of copyright and frankly you're also talking about deliberate copyright infringement – which is a criminal offence. Also fraud. Additionally, if you begin the dispute with this person, I would say that they will probably leave immediately. Have you got somebody else to run the business or would that be the moment that the whole thing collapses? If it is the latter, then this is something else that you need to prepare – somebody to take over as seamlessly as possible   Also, do you know the address of this person – and do they own their own home or any other assets?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Excel Parking Defeated in Court Today


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

maybe some can beter the little ditty below, was never good @ poetry

 

Oh Mr. Perky what can you do?

Your business going down the drain, now you got the flu

Other PPC's running to the hills, lost twice because of you

Making burgers and spitting in them, oh dear visits from an EHO

Are you sitting on the Loo?

Maybe the Boys are coming round with a GOB Clamp for you

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Maybe the Boys are coming round with a GOB Clamp for you

the question is would they be able to find a clamp big enough to do the job?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not who pays me that matters, its my intentions and purpose that do. Would it matter at all if I did work for a PPC ?

 

Not if you were honest about it, but if you worked for MFI instead of MI5, you'd lose a lot of street cred.... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the 6 item breakfast. Didn't see you lamma. Do you think it's time we finally announced the CAG/Pepipoo parking forum get together held in Madame C's recently? Wasn't too impressed by the car parking though - couldn't manage to get me an invoice for love or money. Couldn't see how you'd fit 7 partners overhead though, unless they were dwarves. Now we know perky is a Lilliputian by intellect but that would be ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gertrude, where ya been? Enjoying the early unexpected Englishsummer? Down the library reading up on the distinction between contract and tresspass? Trying to placate Renshaw-Smith? Well you did tell him it was a done deal and all would change after the flukey set-up at Oldham. And despite Perky's attempt to change the subject that is the ONLY victory the PPCs have EVER had. Based solely on posts on this very forum. Well I guess it is appropriate that Perky should get some reward for all the time he puts in here and the great effort he makes to remember what his latest username and password is. That cannot be easy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parking companies win court cases up and down the country every few days. Just because they're not all documented on these forums doesn't mean they don't happen.

 

cherry picked. Take the pepipoo challenge then. its been available for months but still no takers not even the great Perky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IIRC the only Pepipoo challenge Perky has taken is trying to obtain advice from the Eagles there on behalf of his missus on a traffic matter without being found out. And he even failed at that! He pretends he cannot take the other long running Andy Foster Pepipoo Challenge by saying that it would be seen as a "set up". You do have to laugh at the irony of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perkytrude, here is a template for you to use in future as you clearly need a bit of help: "There was a victory for CPS in [insert randon town name]." We can only assume from Perkytrude's deflection attempts that he was heavily involved in this latest Wrexham debacle and is very ashamed. And rightly so. A little birdie tells me the Wolverhampton dimwit was the one who talked Excel into going for it again after their "senior moment" in forgetting to turn up in December. Now they blame the chump. Furthermore he has at one fell swoop undermined the alleged legal basis for every ticket for unauthorised parking. With allies like this who needs enemies, eh Excel?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parking companies win court cases up and down the country every few days. Just because they're not all documented on these forums doesn't mean they don't happen.

 

Really??

 

There was a victory for CPS in Portsmouth County Court and in Scotland also documented on this forum.

 

Ah, so it's gone from every few days to 2 cases only.

 

You couldn't make this up, yu really couldn't.

:lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Combined Parking Solutions once claimed victory in a case when it emerged that the defendant had not even turned up. Well I guess it was the only way Perky could win. He likes to claim he has a law degree but he is woefully out of his depth amongst real lawyers like the Eagles. Far better suited to pouring coffee and frying up greasy breakfasts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parking companies win court cases up and down the country every few days. Just because they're not all documented on these forums doesn't mean they don't happen.

 

I'm going to change allegance here, so come on Gerty, I'm on your side now, lets go get all the disbelieving rabble of cag, lets post up all the victories we have had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to change allegance here, so come on Gerty, I'm on your side now, lets go get all the disbelieving rabble of cag, lets post up all the victories we have had.

 

 

Ohh, how exciting!

 

Waiting for Conniff's and Gerky's next post with all the victorys on........

 

 

waiting........

 

 

waiting...............

 

 

 

waiting..............................

 

 

getting tired...........................................

 

 

 

 

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well stuff you crem, lets start in say Portsmouth, there was em, em, oh wots e called em, ok forget Portsmouth, there are all the ones in Lincoln like .... misses em what-you-call-her, you know the one with the ginger hair? no hang on that wasn't Lincoln, I think that was Gloucester... oh I don't know Come Gerty, I'm struggling here, help me for goodness sake.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been trying REALLY hard to flesh out the details of theis PPC 'success' in Scotland (You know, that place where they 've decided that clamping cars is just extortion and therefore, ill-advised).

 

I cannot find one - and I went back to 2005 Of course, there may be 'wins' in the sense of an undefended action - most likely because the address used was wrong or otherwise invalid, or indeed the recipient treated it with the contempt it deserved and ignored it knowing that enforcement would be non-existent.

 

No - for a 'win' we need something verifiable where a court has rules that a PPC has been justified in their action and the motorist made to pay. Otherwise, these non-scare stories of civil enforcement successes are just so much apocryphal as to be less than useless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...