Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I've moved your thread to the Residential and Commercial lettings forum. People should be along to advise later. HB
    • Ah I never even considered it, odd f9r me because im Tech savvy. Had a look and sure enough its all there in my google timeline. Perfect. 
    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest are threatening my partner with bankruptcy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My partner is being threatend with bankruptcy by capquest for a debt that is 10 years old. Capquest claim that he has paid 150 pounds off the debt, but that payment was not towards this debt. We own our property but I own 90% and he owns 10%. Can they force me to sell the house to pay off his debts. I am really worried because our daughter is settled here and I love this house. Can someone please help, I really am worried

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blossom....a warm welcome to the CAG forums....a few questions if I may...what is the debt for ? Have you received a statutory demand ? roughly how much is owing (don't be specific) Has there been anywhere in the life of the debt where he/she has not made a payment or acknowledged the debt in 6 years ? Are they saying the debt ISN'T statute barred ? Why are they saying £150 has been paid off....

 

I'll also move this thread to the debt collection forum too....you will get some more comment/advice...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42man

Thank you for replying. The debt was for a loan to Natwest Bank taken out in his name only. the letter I received today says that Capquest sent out a Statutory Demand on March 30th, but we have not received this. The total amount owed is 2500 pounds-ish and no payment has been made for over six years. Capquest contacted my partner a couple of months ago about another amount that he owed to Natwest and he made a payment towards that, which is the 150 pounds. They later placed a charge on the house, so he stopped paying. This new one for 2500 has come out of the blue, with no statutory demand just a bankruptcy threat. The loan is not in my name, just my partners and I do own 90% of the house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you need to obtain specialist legal advice on this matter.

 

Bankruptcy is extremely complicated and it would appear that you and your husband re: the mortgage are joint and severable liable.

 

Having said that, it would cost more than the debt £2,500, for the creditor to make you Bankrupt/Insolvent.

 

Phone National Debtline asap, in order that they can advise you and put you in touch with a specialist solicitor.

 

Please do not worry to much, because there is much help available via the Community Legal Services and Legal Services Commission that will assist you.

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome, am I reading this correctly that the loan is in OH name but that CapQuest have written to you?

 

If you sent off an immediate CCA request in connection with this particular debt to Capquest they have 12 + 2 working days to provide the original Agreement which may be quite difficult given the length of time this Agreement was taken out.

 

A SAR would bring you more information as to what and when the last payments were and could go to proving this debt SB.

 

I would of course, also suggest that you take the advice above seriously too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if I could just check something.............. You say that they put a charge on your house? Is this for a different debt? My understanding is that to put a charge on a person's property, they must first have a CCJ? (correct me if I am wrong people) Do they have a CCJ against you?

 

The more information people can get, the better they can help! :)

 

Cheers.

UF

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have checked my partners credit history and there is no CCJ for this debt on his file. Yes the charge on the house is for another debt, which Capquest fooled him into thinking it was from now and not 10 years ago! We have not received anything from Capquest other several phone calls and than this letter today that HL Legal sent on Capquests behalf stating that they are going to bankrupt my partner. Is it too late to send of a CCA request? Should he contact this HL Legal or take the letter to a solicitor?

Thanks

Blossom

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long ago was the Charge put on the house? Did you attend Court when the original CCJ was granted? There would have had to be at least 2 Court Hearings to get to the Charging Order.

 

It is not too late to send the CCA - this should be sent to Capquest.

 

However, it does sound as though you may be in a precarious situation as already having a Charging Order could mean that the next stage would be an order to force the sale of your home - if you have not been defending this case, Capquest will deem you to be an easy case and will take it to the limit unless you get some serious advise and act sooner rather than later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I be forced to sell my house if Capquest do make my partner bankrupt considering I own 90% of the house. The debt in question, was taken out by him 10 years ago when we were not together and for a business I had no part in. What should I do to protect my home? Can Capquest do this after 10 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK HERE YOU GO

 

GET YOUR CCA OFF NOW

 

 

Notice I said at post no6 that there was a requirement for the creditor to be in possession of an enforceable agreement. If in truth the agreement wa unenforceable, then arguably the creditor gave nothing in consideration for the voluntary charge.

 

Of course, at this point in time you do not know if the agreement is unenforceable and no doubt were you to see the agreement and copnclude it was unenforceable the credtior would claim otherwise. In the event there is an issue whwether the agreement is enforceable or not you might bring proceedings for a declaration as to the enforceability of the agrement under section 142(1)(b) of The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

x20

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lilly White

 

I will send the CCA off straight away to Capquest and wait for them to respond. What do I do about this statutory demand they say they have sent but we have not recieved? I am really worried as I do not understand this legal process.

 

Blossom

Link to post
Share on other sites

EDIT: Sorry, people beat me to it!! lol :D

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anywhere in the life of the debt there is a gap of 6 years (5 in Scotland) where no payment or acknowledgement of the debt was made, then it is statute barred. Once it is statute barred, it cannot become unbarred!!

 

This is, of course, unless they have a CCJ!!

 

Cheers.

UF

 

 

I am not a legal expert and I have no legal training. All of my posts are just my opinion and I cannot be held responsible for their accuracy or the way in which the information etc is used.

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is over 6 years and is stature barred. But Capquest claim that my partner paid a total of 150 pounds on in June 08. He did not pay the money to them for this debt but for the debt which the charge on the house. However, Capquest are claiming the money was paid to this debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, before he paid this £150, was there ever a gap of 6 years where he did not pay or acknowledge the debt?

 

If this is the case, then their claim that he has made a payment means didly-squat because a stat barred debt cannot become unbarred.

 

Cheers.

UF.

 

 

I am not a legal expert and I have no legal training. All of my posts are just my opinion and I cannot be held responsible for their accuracy or the way in which the information etc is used.

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you United Front.

There was a 6 year gap where he made no payment or acknowledged the debt. So the debt is SD. What do I do about this bankrupcy threat and how do I stop them making these threats?

 

Feeling alot less worried thank you all

Blossom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blossomtree, in my opinion the debt sounds statute barred. As such, you would have grounds to set aside any statutory demand served upon you.

 

If it were me, I would save my money and effort and just go straight for the stat barred letter from the CAG library:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

I would send them this and see what they come back with.

 

Have a really nice and relaxing weekend! :)

 

 

I am not a legal expert and I have no legal training. All of my posts are just my opinion and I cannot be held responsible for their accuracy or the way in which the information etc is used.

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...