Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've read loads of old messages about what to do but feel my case is different, it's a bit of a back story so ill break it down. - Had a letter from an Italian province in July of 2020 for a speeding offence in 2019 for 575 euros, was in a hire car I used for work, no longer work for them and heard nothing from either. - Thought blimey, but went to pay it anyway, it had doubled to over 1100 euros, yeah I can't afford paying that, filled out the attached information sheet to say it was me driving but I have no money or job due to COVID (true story) and sent it back (durrrr) - Heard nothing until December of 2023, a letter from an appointed solicitor from Florence saying if I don't pay, we will chase you through the legal system with costs born by you. - May of this year, I get a letter from CLI (Credit Limits International) saying they have been appointed to carry out the collection, £1475. - Stupidly, I started the 'three letter process' asking for proof etc, and they replied a few days ago with a copy of the fines I had received from Italy, they stated the debt has no terms and conditions as it relates to a fine in Italy and the debt is not subject to the Consumer Credit agreement. I translate that to "at the moment we don't own the debt and have been given authority from Italy to pursue the debt". That is where I am currently at, I would begrudge giving in and paying an obscene amount. As seen from similar threads, I know a threat of a visit is coming, followed by a threat of court action, but annoyingly it hasn't been mentioned how these cases were concluded and the threads are now locked. I've read to ignore them, but can't help but feel that because it's such a substantial amount that they will feel it's worthy of pursuing this no matter the hoops they have to jump through. Along with admitting it was me driving and opening the can of worms by contacting the DCA, it wouldn't look good for me should it ever get to a courtroom.  Has anyone with previous experience managed to 'get away with it'? Anyone know what they're capable of other than nagging me? I'm not after any moral judgment. Forgot to add, got friends in Italy, and one of them rang the Police where the fine came from, and her reply was “Tell your friend it’s not a big deal, it’s only a speeding fine we’re not going to chase him, tell him in future to take his foot off the gas, however it he returns to a Italy and gets control checked, he would be held until the fine is paid”  A bit odd I thought, considering I am being chased now.
    • take the SD card out and put on a pc/laptop then run recuva on it in  select videos only option select specific location hit browse then select drive letter of the SD card. then next  then deep scan then go have a cup of tea..  when done dont recover the all files back to the card select a new folder on your pc/laptop        
    • hi all, i will list my curmcumstance first then list the details of the penalty charge - we are 2 diabled people being affected by the cost of living crisis and are skint etc. i am disabled with mobility issues(arthritis in knees and ankles and gout) and cant operate car pedals anymore so i let a friend up the road use my car in exchange for her driving me about. its a good arrangement as i get a 'chauffer' and she gets the use of car. the car is parked in her drive which is better as i was refused a disabled space (even on appeal) and too much congestion to park the car outside my house. my friend is vulnerable as she has suffered depression and suicidal thoughts since the loss of her mother a few years back, she is dyslexic, she is a carer for one of her sons that is disabled due to mental illness and mobility. she lives in a council house and cannot work. we went to iceland ..attracted by the 10items for £10 offer - we've never been there before. a large artic lorry was parked accross the car park blocking the view of one of the parking signs and blocking the disabled bays where the pay&display machine is. by the time she helped me out of the car and then went to see if it was pay&display then came back to me at the car she said she thinks it was pay even for disabled, so we looked for change in the car which we didnt have (she normally goes asda which dont need to pay for parking)so then we said we'd either go get change or go to asda...so then by the time it took her to help me back in and get out the car park took 15 minutes...5 minutes overstay past the 10minutes grace. the letter from excel parking came through and i sent it back giving her name as driver (before i saw on here that you shouldnt name the driver) then i appealed explaining what happened (lorry blocking etc) and even said we were being descriminated (advised by citizen advice)as we are disabled and 15minutes is not long enough for a crippled disabled man and a woman with dyslexia to read and understandd the sign and get out, then back in the car and look for change then get out the car park in 15minutes. i even explained she was a vulnerable person on anti-depressants and even sent a photo of medication and said if you need a doctors note then let me know....the appeal was rejected. i've emailed iceland over 50 times and they just wont tell excel to cancel this charge - they are ignorant and ive even asked them why they have a webpage saying 'iceland combatting the cost of living crisis' pretending to help their customers and they wont comment...they'd rather put more stress and anxiety on an already suicidal vulnerable person just to get money out of them..so their 'help' during this crisis is a lie as it wont even extend to disabled customers. she has now received 2 letters from DCBL saying she owes £170 for 5minutes of overstay. the last one is a final demand. as she cant read or write very well ive sent a recorded letter to DCBL (as advised by citizen advice) asking not to attend the property due to a vulnerable woman inside the property as it will only exasperate the situation, they have ignored it and basically said we dont care, you still owe. could anyone please advise - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake.   1 The date of infringement? 28th dec 2023   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] yes   If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   Has there been a response? yes   Please AS A PDF FILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first.   Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] yes   What date is on it? 15th january 2024   Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? yes   [scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'scant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] not on the front - maybe on the back but cannot find the letter now   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] yes   5 Who is the parking company? excel   6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? gravesend in iceland    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie Hall. Do any of you know of them?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Would people advise me to ignore the letter completely or return it to them with "Not at this address"?

 

File it for the moment in case they come back to you later - i wouldn't advise putting "not known at this address" as they can check.

Or you can always mark it return to sender

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 973
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all

 

Phew - I'm so glad I found this thread. A couple of weeks ago my mum got a phone call from these delightful folk demanding to know if I lived there. Although she said that I didn't, they have still sent me a letter to her address, which she's forwarded to me. It purports to be about a Barclaycard debt. However, I have had no credit cards for the past 15 years - settled my last bill in full, as ever, returned it to the bank when I gave up my fat cat job and became a poor student. I have told mum in no uncertain terms that I DO NOT OWE THIS MONEY, but my dad is pretty senile and we are worried what he might do (i.e. pay the bill) if he answers the phone.

 

What do you reckon? Ignore and be worried about the old folk being hassled? Or send the statute thingy letter?

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tiglet.

 

I think I ought to send them a letter. But, having looked at it again, the statute barred letter makes it sound as if I am saying that there is an old debt. And what I am saying, is that there is no debt. Och, I am so confused.

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

tbern123 had the same with a Barclaycard account which he had never had but his was through the Collection agy Cabot. Take a look at the earlier strings of his thread.http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/cabot/36665-cabot-again-urgent-help.html

 

Personally, I would send them a CCA Request letter with your £1 postal order http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/83035-guidelines-requests-original-agreement.html which states a) "I do not acknowledge any alleged Debt to your Company" b)asks them to provide a copy of the original credit agreement they should have c) statement of the account and d) any Deed of Assignment which has the debt assigned to them. That way you don't need to be worried.

 

I doubt you'll hear from them again, but if they have the address and begin telephoning as they are prone to doing then you need to find the harassment letter in the Templates library on here and send them that. Under the Communications Act 2003 if you ask for anyone not to call then you can stop them by using this Act.

 

Do not pay anything, do not answer telephone calls from them without telling them you will only communicate in writing, and most of all, do not worry.

 

If they give you any kind of grief what so ever complain to your local Trading Standards office. These people are the pits.

 

 

Sarah

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If they give you any kind of grief what so ever complain to your local Trading Standards office. These people are the pits.

 

 

Sarah

Their local TS have a rather huge file on these numpties and would be delighted to hear from you. East Ayrshire Trading Standards
  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks andrew and ODC.

 

I've checked the CCA request letter. However, I think I will send the letter below first (gonna sleep on it, maybe ask a couple of my lawyer mates tomorrow night). Basically, I have two issues to address, which are not mentioned in the CCA letter I found on this site*:

 

1) I do not owe this money

 

2) The demands (both by letter and phone) are beign sent to my parents address.

 

So, here's my proposed letter:

 

......................................................................................................

ADDRESS

 

DATE

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMPANY ADDRESS

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

Account No: XXXXXXXXXXX

 

 

You have contacted me at the address of a third party regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by me.

 

 

I do not acknowledge any such debt being owed.

 

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive and unfair methods.

 

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

 

I ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account, other than a letter confirming that no further attempt will be made to contact me with regard to this matter, unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed.

 

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

NAME

.....................................................................................................

 

*(correct me if I'm wrong - it may be that I was looking at the wrong thing)

 

Of course, as these numpties do not have my real address, I'll not be giving them that - I'll be sending it c/o my parent's address. I think I got my dad to understand tonight that he must not speak to them.

 

Thanks for being here, all of you. I was feeling really rotten when I got this letter and reading this site and your comments have given me the confidence I need to stand up to these neds.

 

Slainte Mhath

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY ALLEGED DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

2) Why put " Without Prejudice" ? - You might be needing this if (doubtful) you ever took legal action.

 

3) A CCA request which costs the princely sum of £1 is a legal application for them to provide you with exactly what you are seeking - Proof of their right to collect a debt. It is set to a defined period in law of 12 working days + 2 for postage, then if they come up with proper paperwork you can challenge it, if they do not, which is most likely, then they will require a court order which would require them supplying the court with the original documentation anyway to collect the debt - so it therefore becomes unenforceable after 14 days. Following a further 1 month without the paperwork arriving they have committed a criminal offence. What more do you need?

 

Do it your way, they say 'bog off and keep annoying you. Do it the CCA way you have the legal process behind you and on your side.

 

These idiots try anything and respect nothing. Try and be nice they will laugh like they have tens of thousands of times before and continue with their harassment. Don't pander to niceness - hit them with what you have on your side, a) the Law b ) the moral high ground.

 

Your letter will get put in the bin by these people and ignored. Use what they refuse to use - THE LAW !

 

Sorry to appear hard, but this is the only way to treat the likes of McKenzie Hall and all these other DCA's.

 

The Cabot Fan Club specialises in showing up DCA's for what they are and cleaning up their Act - take it from one who knows ;) I'm in it!

 

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the top of all letters always put

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THIS OR ANY OTHER DEBT TO YOU OR ANY COMPANY YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT.

Of Course you could have your father write to them and say that the person to whom the letters are addrssed to DOES NOT live at this address

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that advice andrew and ODC - I'll be taking it.

 

Can you help me with another question? The love letters from MH are being sent to an address in England. However, I live in Scotland. Obviously, the legal situation is different depending which address I use. Up here, this would be statute barred after 5 years - and after that time the debt ceases to exist. Which makes me think it might be to my advantage to use my own address to contact them. But, but, but ...

 

What are your thoughts?

 

(PS: is it wrong that I am, in a sense, starting to enjoy this now?)

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait to see what response you get from your CCA request. Its highly unlikely these muppets even know what a CCA is let alone be able to find one. Keep your Scottish addres up your sleeve for the meantime.

 

MH specialise in the purchase of debt which no-one else has been able to recover and thats usually because its statute barred or unenforceable. Lets wait and see what response if any you get from them

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll keep you posted. Forgot to say - I'm not asking for the CCA. Having listened to all of you and thought about it, I reckon the best thing to do is to go the statute barred way. As, although I do not admit any debt, time is on my side.

 

However, it is late in the night. Yet again I am sleeping on it, so if you think I am wrong please tell me. You folk obviously have loads more experience than I do of dealing with these sweethearts.

 

I just want to get them off my dad's back. He's not coping well with this. I can't get him to write any letters, so I have to do this myself

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll keep you posted. Forgot to say - I'm not asking for the CCA. Having listened to all of you and thought about it, I reckon the best thing to do is to go the statute barred way. As, although I do not admit any debt, time is on my side.

 

However, it is late in the night. Yet again I am sleeping on it, so if you think I am wrong please tell me. You folk obviously have loads more experience than I do of dealing with these sweethearts.

 

I just want to get them off my dad's back. He's not coping well with this. I can't get him to write any letters, so I have to do this myself

 

With the Statute Barred situation, you must be 100% sure you have not paid any money, written any letters or made any contact with these people (Original Creditor or otherwise) at all in the last 5/6 years. I set my stall out above with regard to using the law. £1.00 - another for a recorded delivery stamp, is your dads peace of mind worth £2 ? are you doing the lottery this weekend? You can always fall back on the statute barred side, of course, but please send in the CCA request as well and get the law firmly on your side.

 

Do not think you are dealing with professional, reasonable or considerate people - THEY ARE NOT!

 

I rest my case, but whichever way you choose, you make the decisions and we remain behind you whatever happens Okay? ;)

 

 

Oh, and by the way Seahorse and Debt_mountain know about the Scottish legal bits in varying degrees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the Statute Barred situation, you must be 100% sure you have not paid any money, written any letters or made any contact with these people ;)

 

Its okay to be in contact in writing so long as you do not make any payments or WRITTEN acknowledgement that any debt exists:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have found this thread very useful but have now received a follow up letter from MH stating that my debt is with SKY TV.

 

I am still am a customer of SKY TV but they have no record of any debt and they have confirmed to me today I owe nothing.

 

I would appreciate advice on my next move.

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have found this thread very useful but have now received a follow up letter from MH stating that my debt is with SKY TV.

 

I am still am a customer of SKY TV but they have no record of any debt and they have confirmed to me today I owe nothing.

 

I would appreciate advice on my next move.

Kind Regards

 

I'd just phone them and tell them what you just wrote. Then tell them to go away and get their facts right before harassing people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but under no circumstances phone these people - it doesn't matter how polite and honest you are with them, they WILL be abusive and rude and pressurise you to pay.

 

Best thing to do is to put it in writing to them, stating "I do not acknowledge any debt to your company" and ask them to refer back to their clients.

 

Knowing this lot, the account may not even be yours, just someone with a similar name.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but under no circumstances phone these people -

 

If you read my other posts you d know I would not normally advocate telephoning any DCA, just thought it a simpler route on this occasion, but Ill stand by your better judgment and experience if you have spoken before and suffered the consequences.:cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

With the Statute Barred situation, you must be 100% sure you have not paid any money, written any letters or made any contact with these people (Original Creditor or otherwise) at all in the last 5/6 years. I set my stall out above with regard to using the law. £1.00 - another for a recorded delivery stamp, is your dads peace of mind worth £2 ? are you doing the lottery this weekend? You can always fall back on the statute barred side, of course, but please send in the CCA request as well and get the law firmly on your side.

 

Do not think you are dealing with professional, reasonable or considerate people - THEY ARE NOT!

 

I rest my case, but whichever way you choose, you make the decisions and we remain behind you whatever happens Okay? ;)

 

 

Oh, and by the way Seahorse and Debt_mountain know about the Scottish legal bits in varying degrees.

 

I'm 100% sure :)

 

And no - I never do the lottery

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

my 1st post here, came across this forum whilst searching the net for any info on Mackenzie hall after recieving my 1st letter from them a couple of weeks ago, it was their usual (so it seems) "we are attempting to contact the above named on a personal matter" bulls**t, after reading a few forums featuring these dirtbags i decided to do 2 things

1 ignore their letter, and not to phone them.

2 get an up to date credit report for myself

 

the credit report shows no defaults or outstanding debts, and everything on there is either "account settled" or payments are up to date.

 

this morning i recieved a 2nd letter from MH, this looked like the kind of letter a pin number comes in i.e. you rip at the 3 perforated sides. this one asks me to call a phone number by **th sept regarding ref number M*******, it also states "this is not a circular or junk mail" (i beg to differ)

 

so that is 2 letters from these cowboys, and i still dont know what it is about. am i correct in my assumption that i should still do nothing? that i should wait to see what arrives from MH next, and DO NOT PHONE them. am i also correct in assuming that i do not send them anything in writing until i recieve their expected "you owe us money" letter

 

Cheers

Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...