Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

charging order granted,what else they can do?...


111honey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5477 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,

i have a loan and overdraft to natwest (26K) i offer 105 pound/month to shoosmith acting on behalf of natwest this is the amount i could afford to pay base on my income and expenditures,i am also on DMP.i continue to pay them although they refuse the offered amount until a charging order granted on oct 2008. ( i've been through a court process etc..) ii stopped paying them this feb 2009 as i dont have a written agreement that they accept that payment and they want me to continue to do so..today i received a letter saying that they require me a proposal for repayment of the amount outstanding i dont know what to do , i can only offer the same amount that i am paying before.please help

.

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are willing to pay £105 then pay it, whether they accept it or not.

 

you can make up your own income and exp sheet and send along a apyment of proposal of £105 and include £105 with the proposal and them state on hwat date and how you will be making future payments.

 

did you contest the charging order?

 

have you claimed back and unlaful charges on the natwest account?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ida,

thanks.i did not do anything after the final CO was granted.i just continue my payment until this feb.regarding the claim i did not have any charges into my account but i would like to try a claim on ppi as this loan was a reconstruction of an old loan with ppi but i am not sure if that still possible? i will take your advise i wll send the offer to shoosmith and can i also ask about stopping the interest as long as i continue my payment?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ida,

thanks.i did not do anything after the final CO was granted.i just continue my payment until this feb.regarding the claim i did not have any charges into my account but i would like to try a claim on ppi as this loan was a reconstruction of an old loan with ppi but i am not sure if that still possible? i will take your advise i wll send the offer to shoosmith and can i also ask about stopping the interest as long as i continue my payment?

 

thanks

 

Why are they applying interest?

 

Was a judgment obtained before the CO.

 

Was the debt in your name only?

 

I suggest you make a full SAR.

 

 

 

Date ******

Subject Access Request (Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account Numbers:

 

As per the section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998, "Subject Access Request", I hereby request that you supply me with any and all historical data in your possession which, in any way appertains to me, including (but not exhaustively) a true copy of the original signed executed agreement; statements of account; duplicate statements and/or print outs of all account transactions; all internal and external correspondence sent or received by you including memo’s, logs, notes, screen prints and transcripts; notes of manual interventions such as telephone attendants' notes, internal and external emails; any other information held on any/all types of media in any relevant filing system (microfiche included). I should receive your full compliance within a maximum of 40 days of this letter being recorded as delivered by Royal Mail.

 

I enclose the statutory fee of £10 by way of a cheque and remind you that you have a total of 40 days in which to comply from the delivered date of this request.

 

May I confirm, as the ICO has already, that the 40 day time limit is not to be used as a guide for responding to the request but is the maximum period allowed in law and that whenever possible a data controller should proceed with all possible expediency in fulfilling such a Subject Access Request.

 

I await your timely responses

 

Yours faithfully

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

thanks for your help, the interest is 8% annual as mentioned in the court by the judge.yes there was a judgement obtained , and the debt is only in my name as well as the property. i did a big mistake on final CO hearing for not sending shoosmith a copy of all my request beforehand so the judge is not happy and granted CO without any attachment.thanks agai ,will send SAR tom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

thanks for your help, the interest is 8% annual as mentioned in the court by the judge.yes there was a judgement obtained , and the debt is only in my name as well as the property. i did a big mistake on final CO hearing for not sending shoosmith a copy of all my request beforehand so the judge is not happy and granted CO without any attachment.thanks agai ,will send SAR tom.

 

The judge is wrong. The court has no authority to award 8% interest post judgment.

Send the SAR off then we can see what's happening with your accounts.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Gave My Defence On The Hearing ,my Payment Offer And I Also Asked To Stop The Interest But I Was Told By The Judge That I Should Give A Copy Of Those To Shoosmith Before THe Hearing Because Their Representative Can Not Decide On That and Should Inform Their Client First He Said they Are Entitled To An Interest. Who Can I Send The Sar Is It Natwest Or Shoosmith Soryy I Really Dont Know What To Do.thanks A Lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Gave My Defence On The Hearing ,my Payment Offer And I Also Asked To Stop The Interest But I Was Told By The Judge That I Should Give A Copy Of Those To Shoosmith Before THe Hearing Because Their Representative Can Not Decide On That and Should Inform Their Client First He Said they Are Entitled To An Interest. Who Can I Send The Sar Is It Natwest Or Shoosmith Soryy I Really Dont Know What To Do.thanks A Lot

 

Send to Natwest.

 

Have you a copy of your agreement?

Have you a copy of the judgment?

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont have the copy of the agrrement nor any docs for that loan ,yes i have a copy of the judgement.thanks

 

Could you scan and post it?

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

thank you sorry took me so long to reply as having problem with computer.anyway i dont have scanner i just write the judgement instead.

 

final charging order.

 

on 8 october 2008,District judge xxxxx

sitting at xxxx county court ,xxxx xxxx

heard the solicitor and the defendant in person and the court orders that

 

1. the charge created by the order made on the 21 aug 2008 shall continue.

2. the interest of the defendant in the asset described in the schedule below stand charged with payment of the sum of 25,771.17 the amount now owing under a judgement or order given on 18th april 2008 by the northampton county court bulk center in claim no. xxxxxxxx, together with any further interest becoming due and 208.00 pounds the cost of application.

3. the cost are to be added to the judgement debt.

 

the schedule

 

the address of the land or charged property is no. 4 xxxxxx. etc

 

 

thanks again.

ps. i would like to write to shoosmith to requst to consider stopping interest as long as i keep my monthly payment offer. what will n happen if they dont accept my offer? i am negative equity in my property.please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi paul,

On the 18th of April 2008 a Judgement or order given by Northampton County Court in Claim no. xxxxxxxxx,ordered the Defendant to pay money to the claimant a total of £ 26,110.00 or by instalment of £523.63 per month.

 

i filed an application for suspension of a warrant and/or Variation of an order (n245) on 2nd of May 2008. The proceedings was transferred to my local court ,xxxxxxxxxxx Court and a hearing was set on 24th of June 2008

 

the judge decision on this :

 

The Deputy District Judge Ward sitting at xxxxxxx county court at a hearing on 24th of June 2008 made the following orders.

• Judgement payable forthwith.

• The Defendant is to pay the cost in the sum of £ 88.13

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to butt in but I've had problems with shoosmiths trying to get them to respond to my subject access request sent to them in February. I think this lot like to refuse ones offer of reasonable repayments until they get the charging order rubber stamped in court, then they accept your original repayment proposals. If they can't provide me with copies of court documents etc. can I then challenge the original charging order albeit its about 4-5 years old?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...