Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dormant account for 2 yrs, now charges!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, my wife got a letter from a DCA a while ago, simply stating they have been looking for her for 2 years, because RBS (Royal Bank Scotland) have not managed to find her.

we have moved around a bit in rented properties, trying to get cheaper accomodation. anyway she left RBS a long time ago with £0.00 balance, however she didn't close the account formally, then we forgot all about it-then 2 years later we she got letter stating she owes over £200 in charges/fees.

she phoned the DCA & RBS and DCa have been very good, no problems-contact and RBS said they expect all will be revealed when statements sent to us, that was months ago, when she phones RBS they just keep saying statements on their way, how much longer do we have to put up with this! is there a template letter which we can send out?

something wherby they have 28 days to resolve this or wipe the "alleged debt"? i expect it was a computer error which caused the charges!

and they have mounted up. we will soon be applying for a mortgage & dont want a debt she does not owe, ruining our chance. HELP!

RBS are not in a hurry to resolve this-but we are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we will soon be applying for a mortgage & dont want a debt she does not owe, ruining our chance.

 

You can always check your credit file for free at annual credit report you don't need to supply any credit card information. IMHO I can't see how any bank account can rack up charges if it isn't being used? Unless of course there were one or two direct debits or standing orders set up on the account?

I also wouldn't continue ringing either the bank or the DCA, unless of course you are able to record your phone calls, try and get everything in writing that way then you'll have a paper trail of evidence if needed. Also if it is found that the alleged debt with the bank is bona fide and legal then pay the bank direct, forget about the low life DCA's, but if the debt is made up entirely of bank charges, then you can dispute these as they are erroneous and currently going through the court system to determine the legality of them, take a look at the template letters and find what best fits your situation.8)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

After giving it a little more thought, who is the DCA claiming you owe RBS an outstanding debt? It may just be their in house collection team, but I fear it may have been sold on given the length of time.

Also if they (DCA) persist in wanting payment you should send them the letter asking for them to provide you with proof that they are legally entitled to collect on behalf of RBS. If they don't provide the proof, or if it is not legal, then they cannot collect nor take any further action until such time as they do provide the evidence.

I'll have a look for the exact template letter, not sure where I last saw it:confused:

 

Here it is! http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates.html

And heres the link for the relevant letter templates you'll need

Edited by Bazooka Boo
Found relevant Info

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, thanks for the speedy replies to this post.

40 days have certainly passed, so may contact the information commissioner, if i dont get this resolved quickly.

Subject Access Request? no did not-due to the RBS staff member stating the statements will be arriving in the mail (been assured this 3 times on the phone!) but will look up S.A.R, get back to you about that.

 

As for the charges being bon-a-fide, can't see how, there were never any debits nor standing orders, maoney was paid in, then drawn out, never went over drawn she said (wife) can only feel a computer error sent her in to the red, on the dormant account-then as usual the bank just kept pressing the charges button on their system, pay me pay me pay me!

going to have a close look at these template letters now-theres probably 1 to fit the bill.

 

The DCA'S name is; Westcot Credit Services" I have to inform everyone, the outstanding balance is £409.72p that is what is written on the Westcot letter- (so it's more than i remember) however-they acknowledge we are disputing the debt and told us by letter "we will suspend all collections activity on the account whilst the matter is under investigation, this means we will not write to you, or telephone you in pursuit of the account whilst it is being investigated.

I cant fault Westcot at the moment-they have been true to their word since the letter dated 13/03/09 was received from them.

jusr checked S.A.R, yes that could help me to force them to send out the statements, but have feeling they will just ignore or tell me that Westcot are dealing with it!

Edited by iwannawinlotto
additional info.
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also specifically request a copy of the signed Banking Contract and the terms & conditions that appertain ton the "alleged" Bank account the "alleged" default relates to

I would send them this SAR.

 

SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST

Made under sections 7-9 and section 12 of the DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998

and by virtue of the Data Protection (Subject Access)(Fees and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No 191)

Dear Sir/Madam

Ref Account No: xxxxxxxxxxx

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited

to, the following:-

1. The original signed, Banking agreement and any terms and conditions that applied

to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with any ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurances added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine signed copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

11. Where any previous information or records held have been deleted or disposed of, the methods used to do so, including dates, certificates or references confirming details of destruction. Where you are unable to provide such certificates, please provide a declaration, nsigned by an authorised officer of your company, confirming the dates and methods of destruction of this data.

12. Full hard copy print outs of my personal or financial information, held in a digital, magnetic or any other format which is held in any archives, backups or other storage devices / locations.

13. Full copies or transcripts of any correspondence in postal, email or any other format which you have entered into with any individual, organisation or third party which contains my personal or financial, or which pertains to me.

14. Details of any third parties which have an interest in my account.

15. Full details of any securitisations that any of my accounts have or are involved in.

16. Any other information that you hold with regards to me and or my account.

A complete list of all transactions or statements relating to ALL of my accounts / applications with your organisation.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you have used to recently communicate with me with regards to my private business and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

IF YOU UNABLE TO DEAL WITH THIS REQUEST, YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY FORWARD IT TO THE PERSON WITHIN YOUR ORGANISATION RESPONSIBLE FOR DATA PROCECTION.

Yours faithfully,

 

I would also include a cover letter stating that they should pay particular attention to each and every specific point and deal with each in turn fully, as should you find out ate at a later that all the information has not been supplied under this request, it will be considered witholding of documents as has been seen of late with RBS.

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

"I would also include a cover letter stating that they should pay particular attention to each and every specific point and deal with each in turn fully, as should you find out ate at a later that all the information has not been supplied under this request, it will be considered witholding of documents as has been seen of late with RBS."

will that not just drag this problem out for far longer than i really want?

i have read the S.A.R yesterday, but wont asking the D.C.A to get a move on be faster?

I havent heard from them for over 30 days (or there abouts) i am entitled to an update from them. i wrote them a letter yesterday, asking them for an update. that was put in the postbox yesterday, so will see what they say, and if not happy will then just send the S.A.R this really is a nuisance, it's bad enough when you are in debt-it's even worse when you are chased for money you don't believe you owe!

will keep you posted when i hear from Westcot. many thanks for the advice so far.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...