Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help - RBS Mint want a fight!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4955 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

Seems RBS Mint are concentrating their efforts on others at the moment. Anyone know at what point they regard a debt as being uncollectable and they back off?

Is there any indication when they get to this stage in the records sent in an SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Letter received today from AIC entitled 'Out of court settlement'. Scarey huh!

They say it has been assigned to them.

The way this all works really bugs me. The correct procedure should be RBS notify me they have assigned the debt first, otherwise how do I know AIC have not obtained the details illegally and are asking me for the money to be paid to them without anything to back it up.

They say my account is frozen with no interest, solicitors fees or court costs being added.

They want the full balance paid 'within 10 days of postmark' of the letter. Tricky, as the envelope does not have a postmark, just a prepaid Royal mail sticker and the usual orange markings. The letter itself is dated 9/11/2009 so 10 days is today, so that's helpful!

Anyone suggest a suitable response? Keep it clean!

Thanks in advance.

Exchange

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading threads. Should I have received a 'Deed of Assignment' followed by a 'Notice of Assignment'? Are these supposed to be in a prescribed form?

Account was terminated back at the beginning of June after receiving a default notice which said 17 days from date of notice without specifying a date, so potentially defective and therefore rescission of contract. Given the situation can they even pass it on to a DCA, I know they can(!) but legally?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi exchange

 

we did find some rules regarding posting outide the UK but in the EU which may be of some interest to you although my big credit problem is from Amex who have issued me an SD which I didn't receive until it was over the limit to challenge so bits of this may be relevant to you and some bits not. I've only just begun learning all this so sorry if a bit vague but this is what I found.

 

1. On the Insolvency Service website there is a PDF download on Stautory Demands and section 5 talks about serving an SD abroad. It increases the time limit from 18 and 21 days to 22 and 28 days. It also went on to say that there were limitations on what could be done depending on which European country you are, it didn't provide any deeper detail than that but it got me thinking.

 

I then found some stuff from the Ministry of Justice under the heading PRACTICE DIRECTION – INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS again because I have an SD but I think the principle must be applicable to you too and it says under serving an SD abroad

 

When a statutory demand is to be served out of the jurisdiction, the time limits of 21 days and 18 days respectively referred to in the demand must be amended. For this purpose reference should be made to the table set out in the practice direction supplementing Section III of CPR Part 6.

 

10.6

 

A creditor should amend the statutory demand as follows:

(1) For any reference to 18 days there must be substituted the appropriate number of days set out in the table plus 4 days, and

 

(2) for any reference to 21 days there must be substituted the appropriate number of days in the table plus 7 days.

 

Attention is drawn to the fact that in all forms of the statutory demand the figure 18 and the figure 21 occur in more than one place.

 

 

So I then hunted for the table it mentioned and found a load of information regarding countries where they agree to process servers and ones where they don't etc and a table of days for correspondence to be replied to.

 

 

 

PRACTICE DIRECTION – SERVICE OUT OF THE JURISDICTION - Ministry of Justice

 

To be honest I got a bit boggled in the end but I'd bet that the bustard DCA's don't pay any attention to these postage rules - I haven't found anything on them anywhere else in the forum yet and certainly mine haven't.

 

Good luck and will follow with interest how you get on if I find anything else which may be useful I'll ping it your way but please bear in mind I am very much a novice on this unlike some of the members who have been giving brilliant support.

 

Cheers

 

Hestia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hestia

 

Thanks for taking the time to post this info. Really appreciate it.

 

Having looked through it and the annex I'm still not sure if it covers a 'Default Notice' although the requirement to allow 21 days in most cases for legal documents does help make an argument for not enough time being given when outside the UK by any (but one) of the companies I am battling.

 

You are the first person to point out any rules regarding this so thanks again and best of luck to you too.

Edited by exchange
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Exchange,

 

I'm not sure about the rules on service outside of the UK but I think you can download them from the Ministry of Justice website at Civil Procedure Rules Homepage - Ministry of Justice

 

If the debt has been assigned to another party by a Deed of Assignment, you should receive notice of the assignment. But that notice does not have to be in a particular format. The case law is that you should be made aware of the assignment with 'reasonable certainty'. The relevant case is Van Lynn Developments Ltd v Pelias Construction Co Ltd [1968] 3 All ER 824.

The Deed is the contract between RBS and the debt collector (AIC). The Van Lynn case also provides that you may ask for a copy of the Deed of Assignment to check that the details of the assignment are correct in the notice to you. If the details such as the date have been incorrectly stated (not just omitted) the Notice is invalid. The relevant case is W F Harrison & Co Ltd v Burke and another [1956] 2 All ER 169.

 

However, I am not sure RBS will have assigned the deb to AIC. I have had a similar run in with RBS Mint. AIC were the second (and rudest) DCA appointed of five who have written to me so far on behalf of RBS since March 2006. But since I asked for a copy CCA of the first DCA which RBS have not supplied, I have just written back to each one to tell them that fact and they have stopped any further action. AIC may only have been asked to collect the debt and if my experience is anything to go by, you have a long way to go yet.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Docman

 

Thanks for the link and info and for the warning. Sounds like a good idea to ask for a copy of the Deed of Assignment.

Seems logical to me that the assignment should be notified to me by RBS in the first place. Why should I pay any money to a company who contacts me out of the blue claiming to have the right to demand payment on behalf of someone else? I know it can happen like this, it annoys me that it is allowed.

The letter from AIC clearly states that the 'outstanding balance has been assigned' to AIC.

Perhaps as I am outside the UK RBS think I am more trouble than it is worth for them, so they have sold the debt on for something (small amount I hope) and claimed the tax relief I believe they get on bad debts.

Perhaps they think having 'International' in the name will worry me. Having checked the Companies House register, Google and the OFT, AIC are owned by a Canadian company but have no connection to where I am. They have a full CCL in date.

Think I will be writing to them and RBS.

Thanks again.

Exchange

Link to post
Share on other sites

after dealing with rbs previously i would adv that you should contact the cccs. these are a free company which can help with getting your finances back in line. rbs insolvency team who deal with the debt collectors for example aic. if correspondance is sent to aic they do not forward this onto rbs nor do they adv them of receiving this. if you do decide to go to the cccs, they are alot better than payplan as they pay all of their accounts on the same day each month so for example they pay on the 25th.

 

with regards to a section 78 request which is your agreement, even if they are unable to provide this, this will only mean that they cannot take court action against you however they can continue chasing you. the team at rbs that deal with s78 requests do not have a contact number so you should just send this direct to the team below.

 

i found the insolvency and client support team at rbs group extreamly helpful you can contact them on 0845 300 5109 this is a direct line for the team that deals with the debt collectors. although they would be unable to stop the debt collectors they can give you advise on what the next stages should be for example with my case they advised me to send in a financial statement to aic as they cannot ignore this. also send a copy to the rbs team direct so that in future if for any reason aic continue they will have this which they can forward on.

 

hope this helps benson1234

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...