Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tate-Lloyd/Claims Management UK


adz1985
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5009 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 239
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The fact that all these companies are based in Swansea suggests that there may be some sort of connection between them. Perhaps the fact that Legal Redress Ltd., CMUK's new best mates, also had offices in the same building as Tate-Lloyd and City Legal Solutions should ring an alarm bell. Legal Redress's website bears a marked similarity to CMUK's (possibly because they are registered to the same person). LR is a limited company, yet its website does not comply with the Companies Act 2006 - odd for a 'legal' company.

 

Anyone who's used Tate-Lloyd, or who's considering using CMUK or anyone they recommend should contact Swansea Trading Standards before making any commitment or handing over any money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When CMUK rang me today, they did say Legal Redress Ltd was a in house company and that I could ring CMUK anytime for a update on my claim as they will have everything on the same computer files now. So fingers crossed something might happen now.

 

It's a long shot though!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also got a call from C/M today after emailing and threatening the with trading standards they have offered to transfer my claim over so may aswell i hope . Gonna try and catch up my payments and see what happens i'm no worse of then before i started well except for late payment fees etc.C/M told me that tate lloyd should never told me not to make any payments whilst it was going through and they would never advise that but to either make your minimum payment or a token gesture just to keep the creditors off your back:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I started with claim management uk who put me through to city legal solutions which the became tate lloyd.Who r u with.:)

Edited by supasnooper
removed website link
Link to post
Share on other sites

I also got a call from C/M today after emailing and threatening the with trading standards they have offered to transfer my claim over so may aswell i hope . Gonna try and catch up my payments and see what happens i'm no worse of then before i started well except for late payment fees etc.C/M told me that tate lloyd should never told me not to make any payments whilst it was going through and they would never advise that but to either make your minimum payment or a token gesture just to keep the creditors off your back:rolleyes:

 

 

C/M told me not to make any payments, as the accounts should be frozen, by law, whilst in dispute. It would seem we are all getting different info from the same company. I was hoping that this would all be sorted by now and that it was taking so long because of back log. However, I am still waiting for my final letter and have been for at least three weeks, although C/M told be it would only be another week before it was all complete. I have tried ringing C/M, got through yesterday and left a message for the person who had been dealing with my case, who was going to call back in 15 mins. Still waiting. Tried calling today, just get message that all operators are busy, leave a message and someone will get back within 4 hours. Still waiting. Looks like I will be getting advise from a real solicitor regarding all of this. Sick of it now. Have also written to C/M asking many questions, still waiting for reply. Surprise, Surprise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just like to say i have been waiting 2 months I have left nemours messages for tate loyd solicitors got no reply beginning to think its a [problem] myself if u have an e mail for them could u pass it on to me so I can contact them plz I paid £400 to have my cards cleared

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just like to say i have been waiting 2 months I have left nemours messages for tate loyd solicitors got no reply beginning to think its a [problem] myself if u have an e mail for them could u pass it on to me so I can contact them plz I paid £400 to have my cards cleared

 

 

Make sure you contact Swansea Trading Standards, who are investigating this outfit.

 

You can email Swansea TS at trading.standards @ swansea.gov.uk (remove the spaces)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to consumer direct who have told me to write to c/m uk telling them that they are in breach of contract as they told me it would take 28 days and it taken longer and that they have got 10 days to resolve the situation the guy i spoke to is sending me a template letter to send so will post it when i get it.Also that because i paid c/m uk and not t/l it is c/m that are breaching there contract i don't really have a contract with them as they haven't had a payment from me

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anybody has a specific complaint about a claims management company please be advised of the following...

 

Dear ,

 

We have been forwarded a copy of an email sent to you by the Office of Fair Trading.

If you wish to raise a complaint against the company in relation to a claims management activity, or discuss any aspect of their authorisation status, please contact this office by phone or email.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Clive Sellek

Claims Management Officer

Claims Management Regulation Monitoring & Compliance Unit

57 – 60 High Street

Burton Upon Trent

Staffordshire

DE14 1JS

 

Tel:0845 450 6858

Fax 0845 450 6866

Email: [email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please report back here if you are still not satisfied with the way your claim is being handled or report to

 

Clive Sellek

Claims Management Officer

Claims Management Regulation Monitoring & Compliance Unit

57 – 60 High Street

Burton Upon Trent

Staffordshire

DE14 1JS

 

Tel:0845 450 6858

Fax 0845 450 6866

Email: [email protected] .uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

What gautantees are they that this new firm will be any better I was told by a guy that I spoke to at claims management regulation that there is no such solicitors as city legal or TL I phoned c/m and told them demanding my money back they said I would get a phone call soon to resolve the matter u know what i'm still waiting for the phone call I SAY IF THIS COPMANY IS SUCH A CON AND FRAUD WHY NOT GET LEGAL ADVICE TO SUE THEM AT LEAST IT WILL SAVE OTHER PEOPLE THE HASSLE OF WHAT US LOT HAVE BEEN THROUGH I'M SERIOUS I'VE HAD ENOUGH IF ANYONE HAS ANY SERIOUS INFO OF WHERE WE CUD START PLZ LET US KNOW IT'S TIME THEY GOT A TASTE OF THEIR OWN MEDICINE DON'T U AGREE?

Edited by MASRSTER09
Link to post
Share on other sites

In these cases the contract is between the individual and Claim Management UK.

 

Although I have not seen a copy of the contract, it appears from some comments on this thread that CMUK may be in breach of contract in some cases.

 

It is perhaps unsurprising that in light of the Tate-Lloyd debacle, CMUK customers may be reluctant to allow their cases to be passed to another company nominated by CMUK. Perhaps CMUK should be offering a refund and compensation to those who no longer have any confidence in their ability to manage this business?

 

However, the advice remains the same: contact Consumer Direct, who can provide advice, and ask that the details be passed to Swansea Trading Standards, who are actively investigating this matter. 42Man has provided the details of the Claims Management Monitoring and Regulation Unit, who should also be informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you contact Swansea Trading Standards, who are investigating this outfit.

 

You can email Swansea TS at trading.standards @ swansea.gov.uk (remove the spaces)

 

Hi,

 

I am new to this forum and have never done anything else like this before. I two am a victim of Tate Lloyd I started the process back in February and paid £275.00. I feel totally let down and if I am honest it is making me depressed this whole situation. Thank you to everyone on here for email addresses and telephone numbers I have just contacted Swansea Trading Standards I do not want them to get away with this. Maybe we should contact Watchdog.

 

Thank you again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I am new to this forum and have never done anything else like this before. I two am a victim of Tate Lloyd I started the process back in February and paid £275.00. I feel totally let down and if I am honest it is making me depressed this whole situation. Thank you to everyone on here for email addresses and telephone numbers I have just contacted Swansea Trading Standards I do not want them to get away with this. Maybe we should contact Watchdog.

 

Thank you again

hi just want to say if you follow the advice and help u get here you might get somewhere im still waiting for a decision but contacting watch dog is one of the best things ive heard by far we all might get seen to sooner then again knowing c/m proberbly not but if you know how to get it on to watch dog im up for it they do need sorting and im sure afew others who use this site will agree to it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tate Lloyd were based at Gower Chambers, Mansel Street , Swansea , SA1 5TE but have apparently now vacated the premises.

Claim Management UK are based at Alexandra House, 1 Axexandra Road , Swansea SA1 5ED and are, as far as I know, still trading. If you initially dealt or contracted with Claim Management UK you should contact them to ask what is happening.

Companies who act as “claims management companies” are required to be authorised by the Ministry of Justice; I do not believe that Tate Lloyd are authorised. Claim Management UK are so authorised and you may wish to register a complaint also with the Claims Management Regulation team at the Ministry of Justice on Tel: 0845 450 6858. Their website is www.claimsregulation.gov.uk if you wish to complain online.

In addition, this Department is also making enquiries into the consumer credit licensing status of both companies; all companies who offer debt advice, counselling or management are required to hold a consumer credit licence issued by the Office of Fair Trading.

I can only suggest that you contact your local Trading Standards service for advice on your specific complaint – details of your local service can be found by entering your postcode at www.tradingstandards.gov.uk They are welcome to contact myself if they require any further information regarding this situation.

Regards

Karen Telford

Consumer Advice Co-rdinator

Trading Standards Division

City and County of Swansea

The Guildhall

SWANSEA SA1 4PE

Tel: 01792 635600

[email protected]

From: *site team edit* [mailto:*site team edit*]

Sent: 28 May 2009 21:18

To: EVH Trading Standards

Subject: Claim Management UK - Tate Lloyd Complaint

In February 2009 I paid Claim Management UK £275.00 for their services of clearing my credit card debts through the terms and conditions, they passed my claim onto City Legal Services who have since changed there name to Tate Lloyd Legal Services. For the last 4 months I have struggled to get intouch with them via email or telephone, following reading comments posted on Consumer Forum I am now sending this email for advise as to what I can do now.

 

Edited by ScarletPimpernel
Remove personal details and email address
Link to post
Share on other sites

Above is the reply I received from Trading Standards.

 

Could somebody let me know how I contact Claim Management?

 

Thank you in advance.

Hi ur not the only person in this situation keep trying phone email even lwetters im in same situation as u can give u a number u may b able to speak to someone the number is 07501465010 customer service 08450706926 these are the only numbers i have but dont hold ur breath i am thinking more on the lines of how to get my money back from c/m

Link to post
Share on other sites

To all who have been affected by claim management uk I have just submitted a complain to BBC watchdog to see if they can investigate c/m uk and help us I request to all those affected to do the same the more complains that they recieve the quicker they might respond thats all thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...