Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Enforcable agreement? Data held at CRA?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I am posting on behalf of a friend of mine. His situation is that in 2003 he took out a loan from Halifax. He fell behind on payments and it was passed to a DCA. Subseqently he started making payments to the DCA and is near the end of his agreement however on checking his credit report he can see that Halifax / DCA show him as being 6 payments behind. He has been paying on time everytime since the DCA contacted him. My question is whether the data showing 6 payments behind is from 2003 when the debt was passed on? He advised me it was last updated 31/03/2009. I would like to add that it says:

 

In the last 36 months of account activity, the number of status 1-2 is 0 and the number of status 3+ is 0

 

The above suggests there have been no missed / late payment in the last 3 years.

 

I have advised him to ask for the CCA. They have advised him that because of the age of the debt the CCA may not be available. They have told him they will contact him with 21days and advise if the have located it.

 

His problem is not the repayments, as he only has a few left to pay, it is the damaging effect it has had on his credit file.

 

If they cannot provide the CCA I assume they cannot submit data to the CRA's about him therefore will have to remove it??

 

Can anyone confirm or offer some advise.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they can't provide the CCA you could send a Section 10 Notice letter #3 The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors & if they refuse to remove the defaults have a read of Knocked back by a DCA on a Sec 10 notice? - The Consumer Forums

Is it still ok to use the above even though they haven't defaulted him?? They have added adverse data i.e 6 late payments on his credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the absence of a CCA they cannot enforce payment also they don't have his written permission for them to process his data which includes leaving information on his credit file. Late payment markers can be nearly as bad as defaults because it gives the impression that he's a bad payer.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the absence of a CCA they cannot enforce payment also they don't have his written permission for them to process his data which includes leaving information on his credit file. Late payment markers can be nearly as bad as defaults because it gives the impression that he's a bad payer.

This is what I believed aswell.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump - Sorry guys

 

Josh mate

 

Its the same old rule if there is no CCA then the debt cannot be enforced, do as cerberusalert says and send the letter (Section 10) advising them they have no right to publish data about him with the CRA.

 

Who out of interest is updating the CRA, is it Halifax or is it the DCA? If it is Halifax then that's fine, if it is the DCA then advise them to cease processing this data immediately prior to legal action being taken against them and if it is both then the most recent entry will be removed.

 

I'd be looking to send the section 10 to the DCA and in the meantime write to the CRA advising them that he never authorised a DCA to process his data and they should remove it cos they know this shyte happens....

 

See what they say mate....

Stick to Facts ------ Facts don't Lie

:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 10 letter:

 

Remember to edit as you see fit and replace default with late payment etc.....

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Their address

 

 

date

 

 

Your reference................ .......

 

 

Legal notice under the Data Protection Act 1980

 

 

To; The Data controller/compliance Manager.................. .................

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

Please be advised that this is a formal notice issued under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act 1980

I demand that you cease processing of my Data by any means whether written or electronically,with third party individuals and

organisations.In addition to processing,this also means passing,ammending,sharing ,and management in any form of my Data in whatsoever filing,both manually or electronically.

 

In compliance with the Information Commissioners guidance,I give you 14 days to comply with this request.

 

The purpose of this request is that I am of the understanding that your continual processing/controlling of my data will cause distress harm and damage.

Specifically because;

 

(i) My credit worthiness is being or has been damaged by your actions as a result of your entries to my credit files,which relate to unfair charges currently in dispute,and found by the Office of Fair Trading to be unfair.You can also add other stuff here as is applicable and any or all of the following that apply (since you need to show reasons as to why continual processing will or is likely to cause distress harm or damage)

 

(ii)That recorded defaults on my credit files by yourselves are in dispute.

 

(iii)That I fully expect to show that adverse data was wrongly filed which would mean that earlier processing was unfair and unjust.

 

(iiii)That matters in relation to adverse data you have entered onto my credit files are currently in litigation.

 

(iiii) That the adverse data you continue to process,manage and pass on to third parties impedes my ability to apply for credit,mortgages or other financial services.

 

(iiiii)That as a data controller/compliance officer,you have a responsibility under the Data protection act to observe all principles set out therein,within the act.

 

 

I expect an acknowledgement of your intentions to comply,and if you do not agree,your reasons for being unable or unwilling to do so.

I will give you 14 days to forward this to me in writing.

 

 

Under the Data Protection Act,a County Court has the powers to order compliance of any breaches it sees fit,together with compensation,at the discretion of the court.

 

Should you fail to comply,or give just and reasonable reasons as to why you will not comply,I will consider making an application to my local Court on notice to force compliance,together with costs and compensation.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

XXXXXXXXXXX

Stick to Facts ------ Facts don't Lie

:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Josh mate

 

Its the same old rule if there is no CCA then the debt cannot be enforced, do as cerberusalert says and send the letter (Section 10) advising them they have no right to publish data about him with the CRA.

 

Who out of interest is updating the CRA, is it Halifax or is it the DCA? If it is Halifax then that's fine, if it is the DCA then advise them to cease processing this data immediately prior to legal action being taken against them and if it is both then the most recent entry will be removed.

 

I'd be looking to send the section 10 to the DCA and in the meantime write to the CRA advising them that he never authorised a DCA to process his data and they should remove it cos they know this shyte happens....

 

See what they say mate....

Ok thanks mate.

 

I will email him later regarding it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks mate.

 

I will email him later regarding it

 

If anything send the link to this thread to him - he can then post direct and the experts will be able to guide him thru the process....

 

 

Hows you today matey?

Stick to Facts ------ Facts don't Lie

:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anything send the link to this thread to him - he can then post direct and the experts will be able to guide him thru the process....

 

 

Hows you today matey?

Yeah I will do....

 

I never thought I would find myself advising people about unenforcable CCA's but hey!

 

It is funny because he told my brother who knows I have become obsessed with knowing the ins and outs of CRA's / DCA's & CCA's so on so forth.

 

I do not know that much about CCA's but do read all of your MSE posts regarding them ......

 

I am thinking of going and getting a tattoo....... :D:D

 

How are you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...