Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Shakespeare62 - v - a NastyBank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4750 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi S62

 

Wow! I've not managed to get on CAG for a few days and I've just got back to your thread to catch up only to find it's grown by many pages!

 

It looks like things are panning out nicely for you, and I can't believe that the enemy barrister is now trying to back pedal on the 'original agreement' authenticity issue. But then, it looks like they're backed into a corner so they've got to try and find some way out, just as you and others have said all along.

 

I can't wait for the next episode!

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have an opinion on this sent to me from my bank during a very serious arguement this is libel or is it

 

SKELETON11-03-2010164532.jpg picture by patrickq1 - Photobucket

 

u frightened em of means

 

u frightened em of means

 

na! s/he/IT is still on...by the way I tried your link for the above but cannot understand the point you're making...is it supposed to b some form of jest...also the image is very faint..:)

 

it was a skeleton sent to me by the bank in answer to some very serious business i had asked them to conduct two hours after the fax they terminated my contract ...it is faint but 17 years on i still got it an still waiting for them to take me to court ..as i informed them not a penny more see you in court...think that says it all

 

it was a skeleton sent to me by the bank in answer to some very serious business i had asked them to conduct two hours after the fax they terminated my contract ...it is faint but 17 years on i still got it an still waiting for them to take me to court ..as i informed them not a penny more see you in court...think that says it all

 

 

:D

 

the fax is classed as a libel and it was to show when the banks want to get down and dirty you aint seen nothing yet,my story is like a horror story lol thankfully the years have mellowed me and nothing suprises me

Edited by citizenB
merged off topic posts
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have merged two lots of off topic posts. Please try and keep this very important thread ON topic:D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shaky62 -When are you you going to have your write up from the hearing ready???? We are all waiting in anticipation

 

Here you go :) :-

 

1) See attached file for write up of the Hearing.

 

2) See 2nd attached file for a note on Expert Witnesses

Overview - Permission to Appeal 8 March 10.doc

A word on Expert Witnesses.doc

Edited by shakespeare62

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law and litigation privilege

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

I repeat my thanks to Everyone who has posted up comments on this thread to date.

 

Below are links to copies of the Notice of Appeal Hearing, and the Court Order

 

Notice of Appeal Hearing

Court Order

Edited by shakespeare62

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law and litigation privilege

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be a script for John Deed !!

 

Well done Shakey - keep it up - I think the final ruling could well have far reaching repercussions ......

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent performance Shakespeare, thanks for taking the time to write up this report :)

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is a testament indeed that a fully fledged barrister is so unsure of his own client's case that he/she has to resort to scouring internet forums to be able to deal with your defence

 

...which is becoming increasingly all but too often. We should be protected by some sort of legal privilege to a certain extent as many people are simply seeking legal advice.

 

I've no time for the won't pays to be honest and if they have information posted here used against them I don't have too much sympathy. I wonder where it will end though. What's to stop some jobsworth posting here "pretending" to be a debtor... writing lots of waffle and then attempting to use it in court cases?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will you be claiming a donation for cag as part of your expenses when you win ?

 

M1

 

I would certainly make a donation out of any expenses I may receive - however I'm conscious of the fact that the show's not over yet.

Edited by shakespeare62

Please note that the right to reproduce any part of any post I make on this forum is restricted under copyright law and litigation privilege

 

Please see the following copyright statement

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is always a possibility that someone could pose as a debtor, and people have done so in the past, but usually if they are DCAs they can't keep quiet and start by trying to say what a reasonable company xxx really is and how we should make arrangements to settle with them. and when that doesn't work they throw a hissy fit and start ranting at us and expose themselves.

 

I think it's just very important to keep a few things back, and also to watch out for suspicious pms, especially the ones asking for private emails.

 

Clearly Amex have been following this thread because they quoted it to the judge, and this is a very specific issue, but for most run-of-the-mill situations, like capone not coming up with any believable agreements, and refusing to let any of us inspect them, it would be much harder to identify a particular cagger.

 

Good morning Guest!

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...